[austintorn@aol.com]

Sure, we can do some effects where they enhance the meaning.

Illustrations can be color in the scientific online version and maybe for the Amazon e-book version, but for the printable Amazon printable version we'll run a grayscale tone thing on the whole pdf before publishing, affecting only the illustrations; otherwise every page would cost 12 cents to print instead of 1 cent or so. The versions are then not really separate files, which would be clumsy, but just one file. We can probably also post process any page size differences.

[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by austintorn@aol.com Sure, we can do some effects where they enhance the meaning. Illustrations can be color in the scientific online version and maybe for the Amazon e-book version, but for the printable Amazon printable version we'll run a grayscale tone thing on the whole pdf before publishing, affecting only the illustrations; otherwise every page would cost 12 cents to print instead of 1 cent or so. The versions are then not really separate files, which would be clumsy, but just one file. We can probably also post process any page size differences.

It's good to know, somebody - namely Nobody & Austin - around here, knows what they're doing. Both you and Nobody appear to have some experience with these things, and boy am I glad about that.

Austin and/or Nobody - Should we set an appt. to meet in the chat room, just to see if it works?
The only one I've ever talked with there, is Carly...
(Don't know what time zone you're in, Nobody. Anyway, Austin and I are EST.)

[N0B0DY]

Recently dealing with a more-than-usual amount of msn difficulties.

Your points are well noted, RP, on all counts. I'm personally looking toward better expressing a monopolar-type theory, focusing soley on the effectual force of the pushing force, and your theory has filled quite a few gaps that other models are incapable of filling imo. It's interpretational, yet I feel what scientists will extract from it eventually will benefit many fields of science.

Looking forward for the real final deal to come about shortly, but in the meantime, if it's okay with you, could you tell me if the Total Field thread is where you are doing your editing? I would like to read the whole of it again with any amendments you're making?

Thanks.

[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY Recently dealing with a more-than-usual amount of msn difficulties. Your points are well noted, RP, on all counts. I'm personally looking toward better expressing a monopolar-type theory, focusing soley on the effectual force of the pushing force, and your theory has filled quite a few gaps that other models are incapable of filling imo. It's interpretational, yet I feel what scientists will extract from it eventually will benefit many fields of science. Looking forward for the real final deal to come about shortly, but in the meantime, if it's okay with you, could you tell me if the Total Field thread is where you are doing your editing? I would like to read the whole of it again with any amendments you're making? Thanks.

Hi Nobody:

Where I'm editing is in the Forums section, under 'TOE Theory Articles' - then go to the alphabetical 'T', for 'Total Field Theory: Reinstatement of Cosmological Constant & Steady State Theories.'

(Work in progress.)

http://www.toequest.com/forum/toe-th...ies.html?ltr=T

So far, I've had one lone star - for politics and PR.
Today it went up to three - Smilies are on a happy spree : )
After some more editing and the addition of some stuff Austin is working on, I hope the rating goes up.
My blog is five star rated, but then again, it's not so complicated?

[N0B0DY]

Thanks for the link, RP. I'm going to go through it again to see if I can answer some of the questions I have on my own. I can understand the frustration of having to repeat what should be blatantly obvious.

I forget to ask if the book you published years ago was a self publishing or not, and whether or not the following would suffice for the final edition of your work? http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Gutenberg:About

[austintorn@aol.com]

Here's a possible 6x9 book cover:



For the back cover, there's always
the 'Gravity is the 4th Dimension',
the expanding lady,
or even the Tower of Pisa picture.

[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY Thanks for the link, RP. I'm going to go through it again to see if I can answer some of the questions I have on my own. I can understand the frustration of having to repeat what should be blatantly obvious. I forget to ask if the book you published years ago was a self publishing or not, and whether or not the following would suffice for the final edition of your work? http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Gutenberg:About

Hi Nobody:
All of my previous publications were 'vanity press' - self published.
I request that you make the decisions about publishing.
I have no perspective in these matters - whatever you think is best.

Questions you may have after reading may help a lot, insofar as pointing out the need for clarification where it may not be otherwise.

Post Script:
Request that you activate your private messaging.

- RP

[RascalPuff]

Hi Austin:
The wife really likes your manifest front cover rendition.
I think the 4-D Goddess lady may make a matching back cover.

Not so sure about the Tower of Pisa.
Back cover may also be light colored, with text of previous commentaries and/or some commentary by yourself or Nobody.

Hopefully you'll experiment with different front & back cover presentations, though I do like the Goddess as She already is, in your existing rendition.

Please be encouraged to excersize your intuition on all of what you're working with.

[N0B0DY]

RP,

I thought I had reactivated my pm, but there were a few options unchecked. It should be working now.

From what I have looked through of your work over the past year or so I noticed that different people have had questions that would be answered if they took the time out to read the work. You really do have a gift for simplifying things, but there is much to go through. I did notice a great amount of positive reviews from a variety of individuals.

If you're giving the go ahead, I could work on putting something together in the way that I'm familiar with. I just didn't want to put in any copyrighted work without permission. I wouldn't go ahead and publish anything without sending you what I had in mind.

I tried to laminate that picture Austin made onto my monitor, but it didn't work. He's quite an artist and scholar.

Feel free to pm me in any regard.

Thanks.

[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY RP, I thought I had reactivated my pm, but there were a few options unchecked. It should be working now. From what I have looked through of your work over the past year or so I noticed that different people have had questions that would be answered if they took the time out to read the work. You really do have a gift for simplifying things, but there is much to go through. I did notice a great amount of positive reviews from a variety of individuals. If you're giving the go ahead, I could work on putting something together in the way that I'm familiar with. I just didn't want to put in any copyrighted work without permission. I wouldn't go ahead and publish anything without sending you what I had in mind. I tried to laminate that picture Austin made onto my monitor, but it didn't work. He's quite an artist and scholar. Feel free to pm me in any regard. Thanks.

Hey Nobody:
Feel free to include whatever of my work you wish - however you care to apply it. Looking forward to what you may put together or otherwise construct.

I've snail-mailed a series of ink drawn illustrations to Austin, some of which can displace several google acquired illustrations; others of which further clarify existing text. Either and both of you are encouraged to advise improvements.