Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie -
03-09-2008, 11:46 PM
Thanks, RP.
After the Afterwards it comes to 104 pages as per Austin's specifications, which are posing a small problem. Does it have to be 6" x 9", or is 7" x 10" okay, Austin?
Either way I could have it done within a week or two, unless Austin - the bullet - Torney can put something together quicker. Just let me know if you want me to pull out.
Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie
Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie -
03-10-2008, 01:11 AM
Nobody,
Yes, there is a 7x10 print size—that's probably the perfect size, since 6x9 could be constraining and perhaps 8x10 is too big. All the other sizes are smaller than 6x9.
The bullet is dilated and is slowly working on illustrations, income tax, playing tennis, and going to many sweet 16 parties.
Rascal,
Maybe we need more on how electromagnetism causes tides and orbits, etc, but I've only read through fact 13 so far.
Also, are there any other space expansions/contractions going on anywhere in addition to 4D expansion of matter?
Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie
Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie -
03-10-2008, 02:18 AM
Perfect fit then, Austin - the slacker - Torney. I'm working in test1, 2, 3, etc., stages, so I'll await your illustrations and any other addendums, then fit them in if that's okay.
Thanks.
Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie
Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie -
03-10-2008, 11:05 AM
Yes, I've been smelling the roses and having spring fever, expanding all the while. I have to unravel some aged yellow and fragile scrolls that look like they were kept in a crypt for a thousand years.
I'll post some illustrations that we did a while back, in case you can put them in, but I'll post at more than 72 dpi so they look good in print. If some are too big to post, I'll name the url that they are at.
Rascal, if you get bored someday, you could set up an account at www.createspace.com and put in the title, subtitle, description, 5 search keywords separated by a semicolon, and a bio of yourself. Then eventually we could use your password to upload the covers and the interior.
Rascal, does dark energy cause any expansion?
Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie
Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie -
03-10-2008, 01:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by austintorn@aol.com
Yes, I've been smelling the roses and having spring fever, expanding all the while. I have to unravel some aged yellow and fragile scrolls that look like they were kept in a crypt for a thousand years.
I'll post some illustrations that we did a while back, in case you can put them in, but I'll post at more than 72 dpi so they look good in print. If some are too big to post, I'll name the url that they are at.
Rascal, if you get bored someday, you could set up an account at www.createspace.com and put in the title, subtitle, description, 5 search keywords separated by a semicolon, and a bio of yourself. Then eventually we could use your password to upload the covers and the interior.
Rascal, does dark energy cause any expansion?
Thanks for the link, Austin.
On the other hand, I'm abysmally ignorant of how to deal with it as you describe.
Hypothetical dark energy is imo, another word for Lambda Cosmological Constant, which is back on the slate, as I have said before, unabashedly retrieved from the abandoned trash can. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy
Please observe the fait accompli reinstatement of Einstein's 'abandoned' Cosmological Constant, as my work predicted - along with an accelerating universe - over 45 years ago.
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie
Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie -
03-10-2008, 01:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by austintorn@aol.com
Nobody,
Yes, there is a 7x10 print size—that's probably the perfect size, since 6x9 could be constraining and perhaps 8x10 is too big. All the other sizes are smaller than 6x9.
The bullet is dilated and is slowly working on illustrations, income tax, playing tennis, and going to many sweet 16 parties.
Rascal,
Maybe we need more on how electromagnetism causes tides and orbits, etc, but I've only read through fact 13 so far.
Also, are there any other space expansions/contractions going on anywhere in addition to 4D expansion of matter?
At this point the issue of electromagnetically induced tides is generally subjected in Part V:
We may - presently opportune to - know, gravity on earth is caused by the electromagnetic 4-Dimensional acceleration of Matter. This generates a mechanical pushing or repelling force on or near the surface of major gravitational masses (such as planets); as clarified within Einstein's elevators of The General Principle.
But, how does this account for action-at-a-distance across Space; generating atmospheric, oceanic and terrestrial tidal effects for example, and sustaining the orbiting of the planets? *Why don't their orbits collapse? Why don't they all (stellar objects, galaxies, stars, et al) collapse upon and/or collide with each other, through mutual gravitational attraction? As Isaac Newton himself asked, and openly considered to be the major unresolved flaw in his own revolutionary system... *Two and a quarter centuries later, Einstein resolved Newton's problem with the Cosmological Constant - a repelling force paralleling conventionally perceived gravity, but acting in the opposite direction... Paralleling the vector of a positive charge; in contrast to the impelling force generated by a negative charge.
The answer to Newton's question is not in the 4-dimensional MassField gravity, on or near the surface of expansively accelerating material systems - but rather the 5 & 6 dimensional ElectroMagnetic field generated by and projecting at right angles from material - 4 dimensional - sources (particles, charges; systems of same). That is to say, material bodies on or near the apparent surface of matter are gravitationally influenced to 'fall', or remain (mechanically-inertially / direct-contact/surface-to-surface) pinned against the earth's 4-Dimensionally accelerating surface. On the other hand, action-at-a-distance - specifically tidal effects and the orbiting of planets & moons - is gravitationally motivated by the 5th & 6th Dimensions of electricity and magnetism, respectively.
Another way of realizing this is, when you are near and above a large 4-dimensional MassField, you fall, until your orbital vector 'outweighs' (transcends) the influence of gravity. Then your orbit is permanent; that is to say, you do not fall back to earth, but rather, around it. Having gone ballistically orbital. --------------------
Regarding 'any other expansions & contractions going on, in addition to the 4-D expansion of matter' - all I can advise at this juncture, is a vigilance for recognizing them as they may prevail in the observed dynamics of the universe.
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie
Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie -
03-10-2008, 05:18 PM
Great stuff, Austin. I'll fit them in where they apply. I'm still working on justifying the whole thing, what should be automatic is turning out to be not so automatic.
Do you have an illustration for the elevator analogy?
Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie
Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie -
03-10-2008, 06:21 PM
Austin,
Hope you bear with me regarding www.createspace.com
and it's contingencies...
I have no idea how to approach this, what to me, is a hurdle.
Do you happen to know, is there a charge for opening an account?
It says 'No set up fees', but I don't know if that excludes a cost of opening account.
Do your instructions parallel their's - it says 'Log in', and 'Create a new account'.
If there's a cost for doing this, I would prefer to send you a check for that amount and ask you to handle it - there's a long list of descriptive stipulations that snows and intimidates me.
Would you get back to me on this, and let me know if there's an account opening cost, and what it is?
Don't take action until I know what the cost is, okay?
- RP
Nobody,
Austin has hard copy pictures of the elevator analogy, though they need enlargement. There are several illustrations I recently forwarded to Austin, which are higher quality than the ones that are posted, including the illustrations of the elevator analogy.
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
Re: Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie