Nobody's Commentary on http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

[RascalPuff]

"Is it possible that gravity is (always) a repelling force - re: Huygens - and we can get rid of SR and QM altogether? If what I propose is true about light and what you propose is true about gravity, we can extend the "point particle" omnidirectionally by merging the 4th, 5th and 6th dimensions as a 3-d composite wave system. I would like to nail this thing in the form of a single omni-(dimensional) force based solely on time. I notice you also cite Newton's action/reaction, and if mass is the equivalent of motion, we can submit that the action (energy) and reaction (mass) are equivalent. This would unify the models because even in particulate theories the graviton is thought to be a spin-2 boson while the photon is a spin-1 boson. If there is no such force as an impelling force, as a first step both can be rendered spin-1 and eventually spin-0; the transitional time for the jumps are then zero because each system is set at 0 Hz. At that point we can then realize the particulate theories and wave theories completely merge, and we can end the war."
- Nobody, Aka, Raven Knight, shoutbox, 2/28/08
Commenting on the content of the work in progress at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

[mkirkpatrick]

Most grateful to you rascal for bringing this to our attention,and for crediting our mutual
friend Nobody with the mention,prehaps all will eventually collapse into a "mind wave"!



regards michael.

[N0B0DY]

Rp,

Thanks for the vote of confidence, but the above commentary was (in part) a question to discern where exactly these issues are headed.

We've hit a few bumps with regards to our interpretations over matter, mass, steady acceleration vs static state, etc. and after looking through your site again I think we would have to settle our own battle before entering a war. Yet, there have been a few folks who mentioned that your work is difficult to navigate through, and if you would be willing to streamline it as far as what you would want included in a book, minus any violations of copyright, I would put it together in a book format so you could promote it in a more condensed form.

I would do it, without co-authorship, and send it to you to see if you are satisfed with it before publishing it. Again, if you feel anything I've written anywhere is useful to you, incorporate without credit and I'll put everything in an e-book.

Fair enough?

[RascalPuff]

Rp,

Thanks for the vote of confidence, but the above commentary was (in part) a question to discern where exactly these issues are headed.

We've hit a few bumps with regards to our interpretations over matter, mass, steady acceleration vs static state, etc. and after looking through your site again I think we would have to settle our own battle before entering a war. Yet, there have been a few folks who mentioned that your work is difficult to navigate through, and if you would be willing to streamline it as far as what you would want included in a book, minus any violations of copyright, I would put it together in a book format so you could promote it in a more condensed form.

I would do it, without co-authorship, and send it to you to see if you are satisfed with it before publishing it. Again, if you feel anything I've written anywhere is useful to you, incorporate without credit and I'll put everything in an e-book.

Fair enough?

In good conscience you must be accredited with all and any contributions included in the work, Nobody. I hope your amenable to that clause.

The work is very much a reconstructive anthology of the work of others, which is also a method of authenticating.

Certainly credit to you includes putting it in an e-book.

Yes. The material in its presently unedited state is difficult to navigate and needs streamlining. While still learning and gathering data it may be a while before it's in a more presentable form.

Of course your proposal is (much) more than fair enough; to say the least.

(As this comes to pass, Nobody, I sincerely think it would be inappropriate not to accredit you with all contributions of every description, per item... Thank you very much. Any disagreements between us can be part of the story.)

Best regards to you and yours,
- RP

[mkirkpatrick]

May I take this opportunity to wish you both the very best on this endevour,if I was not so
humble I'd be proud of you both!


warm regards michael.

[RascalPuff]

May I take this opportunity to wish you both the very best on this endevour,if I was not so
humble I'd be proud of you both!


warm regards michael.

Dear Michael:

rotflmao

(P.S. Yer a very attentive and cordial moderator, your penchant for levity is favorably contagious. Thank you for only humanly being thither and skelter, all over this site.)

Cozy considerations,
- RP

[N0B0DY]

Like you said, RP, this work is based upon the cumulative work of too many names to mention, and accrediting nobody might be an appropriate way to include everybody. I always said that if were to author a book it would be entitled "Nothing" by Nobody Nowhere, for the above reason.

If you wish to omit RK from the picture, and attempt to streamline the work in the sense of just putting together the details of what you would want included, I'll do it.

[neutralino]

I definitely agree with the suggestions of putting your work in the form of an e-book (even if it's just as a pdf on your webpage). I still can't really work out how to follow your website!

[RascalPuff]

I definitely agree with the suggestions of putting your work in the form of an e-book (even if it's just as a pdf on your webpage). I still can't really work out how to follow your website!

Hi Neut:
Please pardon my ignorance.
What's a 'pdf'?

Thank you, in advance?

- RP

[neutralino]

Hi Neut:
Please pardon my ignorance.
What's a 'pdf'?

Thank you, in advance?

- RP

pdf stands for "portable document format"; it's basically a format that you save a file in such that it will open on any computer, regardless of operating system. To open such a file you need only a free reader like "adobe acrobat reader." (c.f. Pat's idea here) To write such a document would be quite an arduous task though, given that there is a fair bit of content.