Tom Campbell's My BIG TOE

[SB_UK]

It is time to wake up.

Wake up
from Dusk till New dawn
Sun rising on a brand new day
Enlightenment
Resurrection
Rebirth
Reborn

ToE is the prototypic example of 'not being able to see the wood for the trees'.

Words create the illusion that reality is quite considerable more complex that we'll soon show it to be -
perhaps the best mechanism to awaken people to ToE will prove to identify a body of knowledge which we can assume most people
to be aware -
- and then to connect the dots from there
out.

Proof that the metaphors of religion can be rationalised into a single model -
- which we can then state is the basis to reality -

offering (scientific) proof to any who'd like to probe further
(- validate the model to their own satisfaction).

~*~

Love is the opposite of fear ...

Fear - most commonly taken as a physical level attribute -
running through fear of attack by another -
animals run in fear from one another.

Love - transcends the physical world.
Transcends the mental world.

If we do not love - do we fear?
If we not fear - do we love?

In the spirit of the scientific model -
- I need love to be presented in a format which makes sense -

- and so would probably need it to fit into the pattern (from above) of 4 forces by abstraction which will thereafter help to solve the

four-fold symmetry

which we associate with reality -



Tetrahedral chirality
->-
left and right handedness



--- bilateria ---

[2banon]

SB_UK you wax very poetically, beautifully even. Here's my best try put on the back of Olivia N John:

Let's get nonphysical, nonphysical,
I wanna get nonphysical, let's get into nonphysical
Let me hear your consciousness talk,
Your consciousness talk, let me hear your consciousness talk

Oh, here is an original:

Being
Experientially
Limited
In
Enculturated
Fallacy

So
Yearling
Scientists
Totally
Embrace
Myth
Stories

Or as Tom says, our belief systems limit our reality to a sub-set of the solution space that does not contain the answer. You want love to be fully explained scientifically, while scientists are limited by their belief that this space-time rule-set we call physics is all there is, it isn't. The answer to what love is does transcend the physical, you are on the brink SB_UK. The answer is yours for the understanding, step outside, you can do it, and then you will understand love as what consciousness is evolving towards. Therefore you are love, you just don't know it internally yet.
Love
Bette

[SB_UK]

SB UK
Are you able to make it to Tom's workshop in London in October, or are you able to help us promote it in any way?
Keith
MBT Events

Hi -
- personally - I find that I can't think in real time
- not fast enough.
Happiest on an Internet forum -
a mode of communication which works with me.

We've examined the transition away from real time communication on other threads here -

-------------
suggestion
-------------
- that the information age is shifting our thought processes away from linear expression into a layered presentation which cannot be constructed in real time
- cannot be understood in real time.

Our problem -
in generating ToE -
is to generate a fundamentally different approach to thinking about things -

- this fundamentally different approach -
we will shortly discover -
will require a whole different mode of interaction between people -

I expect to see a shift away from oral into written presentations.*

Association of this idea with the evolution of man -

barking out orders ->- Cave paintings
vocal -> written

An increase in abstraction accompanying human evolution -
with precedent safely recorded -
it isn't such a huge jump to make -
to assume
that what we then saw - we're seeing now

- albeit the abstraction of communication (information content relay) -
being shifted up to a whole 'nother level.

~*~

* Note -
common observation of speech being prevented in monasteries -
- however not so writing.
---------------------
Suggestion
---------------------
Linear thought which speaks with vocal cords
as
the very enemy of spirituality
- spiritual endeavours which lead to spirituality

- spirituality realised by real-izing shift
- shift in modality of thought -
enforced perhaps
- mechanism unimportant
- sensory deprivation of sorts (not being allowed to talk or listen) which provides the stimulus for change -
- change requiring opposing force against which
- to overcome

- the necessary pain of change -
- change for the better.

Summary of
* Note -

Extrapolation of the speciation of man to mind 30,000 years ago to now -
- provides us with an explanation of many of the behaviours which we experience amongst groups in current life -
- should be used as a basis for the suggestion that the speciation event which was observed back then
is re-occurring now.

[SB_UK]

Or as Tom says, our belief systems limit our reality to a sub-set of the solution space that does not contain the answer. *1*
You want love to be fully explained scientifically, while scientists are limited by their belief that this space-time rule-set we call physics is all there is, it isn't. *2*

The answer to what love is does transcend the physical, you are on the brink SB_UK.
The answer is yours for the understanding, step outside, you can do it, and then you will understand love as what consciousness is evolving towards. T
herefore you are love, you just don't know it internally yet. *3*

*1*
--- similar to ---
“You cannot solve a problem from the same consciousness that created it. You must learn to see the world anew.”
--- and ---
'wood for the trees' -
a difference in hierarchical perspective.

*2*
Understanding such that we can facilitate an imminent

'future love paradise'

- rather than just imagine how great it'd be.

Demystify love
- and we stand a chance at real-izing the many consequences which'll accompany.

Otherwise
business as usual
- imprisoners to more of thi$ insanely inane

yawn!

crucifyingly dull drudgery.

*3*
I love my dog.

_|_|_|_|
_|_|_|
_|_|
_|

Evolution is unidirectional ---> pull --->
The dog is not of our species.

_|_|_|_|
_|_|_|
_|_|
_|

Love -
the unidirectional pull of evolution realized through the pull of lovely exquisite complexity -

from below

- sniffing my feet.

~*~

It's dinner time and I'm a sloppy eater.

[final.theory.chick]

Hi there, I'm a young girl in my twenties, totally into Final Theory and physics. Travelled to Switzerland to work on large Hadron Collider and am a MTI student. stumbled across a book due to be released in a few months with new perspectives on Final Theory.It's called Nature's Watchmaker by a South African, John Thompson. It seems like its pretty good stuff and he's suprisingly on the ball! desperate to get some opinions! here is some general info on the book:

In Nature’s Watchmaker John Thompson seeks to provide an answer to the enigma that has been engaging scientists and philosophers since the study of time began: a complete description of all the physical processes governing the universe from its creation to its ultimate destruction.

His new theory confronts the major issues currently faced by scientists including gravity, the perplexing dark matter and even more baffling dark energy. It explains why particles exist, why they have their specific properties and predicts exactly the values of certain constants previously only obtainable by experiment. The theory shows that despite the universe apparently expanding at an ever-increasing rate it will eventually enter a contraction epoch. Unlike current theories it combines all the effects found in both the microscopic (atoms) and macroscopic (stars, black holes, galaxies) universes in one simply derived equation.

Intriguingly, this new theory even answers the ultimate question: why does anything exist in the first place?

hit me back with some thoughts and more links if you're interested!

[WHY 137?]

Or as Tom says, our belief systems limit our reality to a sub-set of the solution space that does not contain the answer. You want love to be fully explained scientifically, while scientists are limited by their belief that this space-time rule-set we call physics is all there is, it isn't. The answer to what love is does transcend the physical, you are on the brink SB_UK. The answer is yours for the understanding, step outside, you can do it, and then you will understand love as what consciousness is evolving towards. Therefore you are love, you just don't know it internally yet.
Love
Bette

Or as Tom says?
Bette is a MBT clone.

folks let me introduce you to Bette.
Bette is just one of the many incognito MBT MoBsTers

I was treated like a crazy person for trying to show how other TOEs intersected with MBT.
Can you believe that many MBT CULT members even had the audacity to chastise me for trying to show how MBT meshed with other theories?

TRUE....

Bette even dared compare me to her crazy abusive freemason husband who went off the deep end, and was a danger to her and her children.

Do not ever try such a foolish thing on the MBT forum.
You can NOT do what Bette is doing on this forum...discuss other competing TOEs on the MBT forum.

TRUTH or DARE?
I dared to show up on that dogmatic forum...
I dared start a thread in their philiosophy/metaphysics subset forum
I dared to ask the question WHY 137?

Bette is here selling MBT....
I challenge anybody to TRY TO GO ON THE MBT FORUM and speak a lingo other than these MBT MoBsTers?
Know what will happen?
You will be crucified.
Ignore MBT folks...just more HOLIER-THAN-THOU dogma.

http://www.my-big-toe.com/forums/vie...php?f=5&t=5539
here is proof of what I say.
Ted Vollers the head MOD on that forum proved himself to be a part time MBT MoBsTers.

Tom Campbell's idea is good but it needs fine tuning to bring it line with OTHER GREAT IDEAS.

namaste

Raphael

P.S.
Bette
I hope the nickname MBT MoBsTers sticks dearie.
You folks have earned it...

send Teddy bear and grin it...
my LOVE

[WHY 137?]

- I need love to be presented in a format which makes sense -

- and so would probably need it to fit into the pattern (from above) of 4 forces by abstraction which will thereafter help to solve the which we associate with reality -



Tetrahedral chirality
->-
left and right handedness



--- bilateria ---

I am with you on the basic structure identified


asymmetry and chirality

http://kachina2012.wordpress.com/200...ght-hand-path/

namaste

[2banon]

Or as Tom says?
Bette is a MBT clone.

folks let me introduce you to Bette.
Bette is just one of the many incognito MBT MoBsTers

I was treated like a crazy person for trying to show how other TOEs intersected with MBT.
Can you believe that many MBT CULT members even had the audacity to chastise me for trying to show how MBT meshed with other theories?

TRUE....

Bette even dared compare me to her crazy abusive freemason husband who went off the deep end, and was a danger to her and her children.

Do not ever try such a foolish thing on the MBT forum.
You can NOT do what Bette is doing on this forum...discuss other competing TOEs on the MBT forum.

TRUTH or DARE?
I dared to show up on that dogmatic forum...
I dared start a thread in their philiosophy/metaphysics subset forum
I dared to ask the question WHY 137?

Bette is here selling MBT....
I challenge anybody to TRY TO GO ON THE MBT FORUM and speak a lingo other than these MBT MoBsTers?
Know what will happen?
You will be crucified.
Ignore MBT folks...just more HOLIER-THAN-THOU dogma.

http://www.my-big-toe.com/forums/vie...php?f=5&t=5539
here is proof of what I say.
Ted Vollers the head MOD on that forum proved himself to be a part time MBT MoBsTers.

Tom Campbell's idea is good but it needs fine tuning to bring it line with OTHER GREAT IDEAS.

namaste

Raphael

P.S.
Bette
I hope the nickname MBT MoBsTers sticks dearie.
You folks have earned it...

send Teddy bear and grin it...
my LOVE

Oh Raphael, you followed me, how cute. I hope you are really just stuck on this 137 thing, and not dangerous. I never said my husband did anything since I do not go for the marriage game, I said my children father used many of the same connections to free masons and the like that you are using in you supposed quest for the answer to "WHY 137" during methamphetamine psychosis. What I DID NOT say, so as to not be a jerk, was "what is your excuse?" You are obsessed with this quest it seems.

Tom said several things very well, and when I use the words in that same order, I give credit where it is due, it's the student in me. Yeah, I'm all about My Big TOE because so far it really is a THEORY OF EVERYTHING so it covers this Reality Frame, and ALL THE OTHERS. I have been trying to tell you that all those esoteric connections with crosses, and numbers probably only applies in this Reality Frame that is under the constraints of our rule-set, physics as we know them. We prefer to be called "TOEheads" if one must peg us, those of us that found Tom's model meshed and filled in their personal toe.

Raphael, WHY 137?
Love
Bette

[WHY 137?]

Oh Raphael, you followed me, how cute. I hope you are really just stuck on this 137 thing, and not dangerous. I never said my husband did anything since I do not go for the marriage game, I said my children father used many of the same connections to free masons and the like that you are using in you supposed quest for the answer to "WHY 137" during methamphetamine psychosis. What I DID NOT say, so as to not be a jerk, was "what is your excuse?" You are obsessed with this quest it seems.

I followed EWE?
Black sheep do not follow sheeple dearie...

I came to this forum because it looks like they are willing to entertain ALL Big TOEs ... not just MBT dogma.
But that obvious conclusion would be LOST on an MBT MoBsTer

yes I am dangerous (in your mind) ....so why don't you contact the board and make up more lies based on your PMR VR illusions and fantasies girl?
lol

hey Bette you seem to bring your paranoia and baggage to the forums, and then project this nonsense onto others?

I am a pussycat.
MEow

I know your excuse for why you slag me.

First off...to go around shouting Tom has provided for the world a Theory of Everything is just plain stupid.
>>> and the way the MBT MoBsTers uphold his every word is pathetic.

Tom might even suggest you GROW UP and get your own life....

Tom said several things very well, and when I use the words in that same order, I give credit where it is due, it's the student in me. Yeah, I'm all about My Big TOE because so far it really is a THEORY OF EVERYTHING

blah blah blah
here you are on a FORUM that is welcome to ALL other Big TOEs in the www ...
here you are selling Toms Big TOE ...
here you are a diplomat from another forum that does NOT welcome other competing theories on their forum.....because you folks have decided your dogma is best!!!
woof woof
IS THAT LOST ON YOU??????????

DUH?????????

so it covers this Reality Frame, and ALL THE OTHERS. I have been trying to tell you that all those esoteric connections with crosses, and numbers probably only applies in this Reality Frame that is under the constraints of our rule-set, physics as we know them.

oh now all I hear is plain old ignorance from you dearie....take a look at all of the competing TOEs on this website alone.

GROW UP
MBT MoBsTers better learn to assimilate Bette.
... and stop being just another belief system who screams and shouts a dogma louder than others....

We prefer to be called "TOEheads" if one must peg us, those of us that found Tom's model meshed and filled in their personal toe.

Love
Bette

MBT MoBsTers and DOH-heads?

Both sound appropriate.

namaste

[2banon]

Raphael I'm not selling anything. You can read Tom's trilogy for free on Google books. I am sharing information which I have found to be extremely useful in reducing fears in my life by understand what crazy things people think are real. I didn't say crazy people, I said crazy ideas or things. Co-incidents, synchronizations, life, death, paranormal, remote viewing, distance healing, miracles, how people are controlled by others who use fear as a weapon, why people do what they do, why we are here, what happens when we "die" (did I repeat that one? It is important), this model of Tom's makes all this AND MORE understandable INCLUDING your 137 obsession, probably. But you come into the MBT site refusing to understand that numerology isn't really important IN THE BIG PICTURE, and probably disappointed that no one there had an interest in your obsession with WHY 137. How we treat other is, so sorry you feel you were treated badly at Tom's site. I, personally, now that you put it there, accept that 137 probably means something important to this Reality Frame, but you presented it kind of like someone obsessed, and thinking you had a secret which you DID NOT share. I have some information that I love to share, freely. We are different, as Claudio likes to say.
Love
Bette