EMSFT: green house gases and kyoto

[tony_fleming]

green house gases and kyoto
i just watched a show on the weather channel about the various options for dealing with global warming via some energy production method, whether, wind, solar, biomass, fission, breeder reactor, hydrogen fuel, tokamak, etc. it struck me just how inportant EM self-field theory is going to become over the next few decades. i hope you will all pray with me that we can overcome our world's problems. i think if the problem is left to man alone, he will just descend into babbling and squabbling, and squarking about this and that, such as big business's rapacious need for ever greater profits regardless of the future impacts. at the same time, we can see that the europeans are unable to convince either left and right of a concensous on a european constitution, perhaps rightly so, perhaps not so correctly.

we need to forget the global politics, china, the u.s., europe, etc, and as nike says "just do it!" in terms of finding out how to get enough energy for our global needs in an environmentally sustainable manner.

EMSFT can give us a CLEAR PICTURE of the nuclear options. i think we need a Manhattan-type effort designed to investigate the possibilities using the new theory and comparing with experiment. surely the U.S. with its need to keep its economy fuelled could use this opportunity and take a lead in the world, given the disaster that was kyoto.

i'll be writing up some pages on the unifiedphysics site over the next month or two; i go to dublin end of june for a couple of weeks, so i'll be mainly off-air for a while.

till then, keep thinkin' and arguin' all TOE buddies. see you at the next internet cafe, probably heathrow.

[David Maes]

I think we've all heard about another option; bringing iron into the water causes growth of algae. Would this endanger other ecological systems?

I also wonder whether global warming will trigger a new ice-age.