[Marko]

I am wondering what are the views of the Heim theory on the future of our universe. I looked at some Heim pages but I didnt found any cosmological speculations like "Big Freeze" , "Big Crunch",...etc.

Also, I would like to know what are Heims theory views on the values of the constants in our universe.Did he predicted one universe,or infinite number of them?

[hdeasy]

Originally Posted by Marko I am wondering what are the views of the Heim theory on the future of our universe. I looked at some Heim pages but I didnt found any cosmological speculations like "Big Freeze" , "Big Crunch",...etc. Also, I would like to know what are Heims theory views on the values of the constants in our universe.Did he predicted one universe,or infinite number of them?

Well Heim is clear on cosmological origins - the 3 spheres of dimension amazingly close to 1 metre: one of those cosmic coincidences - they then divided until they became the metrons of today, of dimension Planck radius. I don't think a big crunch is foretold, as it took 10**170 years or so to get from the ' big-3-spheres' phase. Probably depends on dimensions of dark energy force due to gravito-photons. Have you seen that
HEIM has MADE THE COVER OF NEW SCIENTIST THIS WEEK !!!!!
- see http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/mg18925331.200-take-a-leap-into-hyperspace.html

The web is alive with discussion on Heim. hallelulia!

[Marko]

Originally Posted by hdeasy I don't think a big crunch is foretold, as it took 10**170 years or so to get from the ' big-3-spheres' phase. Probably depends on dimensions of dark energy force due to gravito-photons.

Yes, with the "spheres" phase we could exclude "Big Crunch".
Then, in the future it could go like this : Degenerate era,Black hole era,Dark era...something like the Big Freeze,and I am wondering what are the Heims theory views on this points. Is the theory predicting recycling of the universe after Dark era,so that after some enormous time,another "spheres" phase is possible?
Or the theory predicts that there is no recycling,just permanent Dark era,or something similar?
Also,is it possible that these "spheres" phase exist in some extremely huge number of possible "outcomes" so that every "spheres" phase could lead to the different constants in the universe,like in Multiverse theory?
The way I see it, Heim theory is really great theory for describing our universe,but does the theory predicts the existence of other universes,with different constants due to the different "sphere" phase? Or the theory excludes this speculations?

Regards!

[hdeasy]

Originally Posted by Marko Yes, with the "spheres" phase we could exclude "Big Crunch". Then, in the future it could go like this : Degenerate era,Black hole era,Dark era...something like the Big Freeze,and I am wondering what are the Heims theory views on this points. Is the theory predicting recycling of the universe after Dark era,so that after some enormous time,another "spheres" phase is possible? Or the theory predicts that there is no recycling,just permanent Dark era,or something similar? Also,is it possible that these "spheres" phase exist in some extremely huge number of possible "outcomes" so that every "spheres" phase could lead to the different constants in the universe,like in Multiverse theory? The way I see it, Heim theory is really great theory for describing our universe,but does the theory predicts the existence of other universes,with different constants due to the different "sphere" phase? Or the theory excludes this speculations? Regards!

So far the only discussion I've seen is of the past - how the current universe only evolved very slowly until the metron size reached infinitesimal dimensions. I will at teh next opportunity query the experts on the future - whether there will be a crunch to another 3-spheres phase or not.

On the mutil-verse issue - the beauty of Heim theory is that there are so few free parameters - only G, h and c. Thus the only way to get new universes is to vary gravity, speed of light or Planck's constant. Whether in future it will be possible to derive even these constants is difficult to say - but that seems to be outside the scope of Heim Theory as presently formulated. But these 3 constants determine al aspects of the forces and laws of nature, so vaying them would be quite sufficient for a multitude of universes.

I hope to have more info on this soon - after I consult the books and the cognoscenti.

[michellemfry]

On the future of the universe, might one consider that a full reaction to the action of the BIG Bang might be something LITTLE. The Little Echo or something like that. Maybe that is what CMBR is supposed to be, the Little Echo.

[michellemfry]

On second thought, maybe the Little Electron.

[hdeasy]

This foru, has lost interst in Heim, but others are doing sterling work after the New Scinetist cover story on his theory on 6th Jan 2006. Look at Physorg.com - the forum there on B. Heim & his structure theory has had more than 14000 views... many here have that?

[bottomlander]

Originally Posted by dleviwing Hdeasy; Heim's theories do nothing to simplify current Standard Models. In fact it tends to impose greater complexity to theses gauge theories just as string theory dose. What Heim seems to be explaining is random wave interference patterns and calling them particles. A true candidate for a TOE theory will do just the opposite and simplify the math functions. When a cause-and-effect mechanism can be shown for the forces of nature, it will not include exotic new particles. Like current theories, Heim's theory requires to much supernatural magic to be real. If you can show me exactly were his theory provides better explanations for defining the forces of nature, I would be willing to review it further. His work is exceptional but it dose not do what you have claimed. Best regards; Dave

Dear Dleviwing,

Glad to read your information.

I am going to write on a model for the interior structures of those elementary particles which possess rest masses. It will employ random wave interference patterns and lattices.

I am now just thinking about other topics, once finished the part of elementary particles (at least after a few months), please make a review. Thanks in advance.

Best Regard. Bottomlander