Aether Physics Model - New Periodic Tables

[volantis]

The Aether Physics Model has already successfully unified the fundamental forces and provided a quantifiable means for including certain aspects of mind into physics.

Recently, in response to a discussion I had with an Iranian scientist, I put together two periodic tables that help reveal the electron structures of atoms and also the nuclear structures of atoms. Two different periodic tables are required since electrons bind according to different rules than do nucleons.

Here are images of the periodic tables:




Full sized images are available for free at www.periodic-table.net. Also, wall posters in four different sizes may be ordered. The quality of the poster material is top of the line. Also at periodic-table.net is more information about the structures of the two periodic tables.

[Mikal]

Hi Volantis...nice to see you back at the TOE.

Is there any way you can further explain this for us folks not gifted with a scientific twist of mind??
It looks quite interesting!!

Also I see you authored Secrets of the Aether. Is there anything from that you could share ??

Regards Mikal

[SteveA]

I've got say that's a nice looking table. You can add me to one of those interested in some of the relationships between it and an Aether theory.

[volantis]

Hi Mikal and Steve,

The Pauling Spheron Periodic Table is described in Secrets of the Aether. I just didn't have the software to design the table in high quality then. The Pauling table bases on Linus Pauling's spin structures of the nucleus. The simple equations for the atomic spin structures are similar to the equations for generating Pythagorean triples and Aether geometry. There might be something else it relates to, but it escapes my mind at the moment.

The electron structure of the Vajra table follows a dipole pattern of filling the orbitals. I find this encouraging as the Aether Physics Model identifies the dipole natures of electrostatic charge, magnetic charge, mass, and particle spin. It makes sense that if the Aether is a dipole structure then the subatomic particles and complex structures like atoms should reflect this dipole nature. Even the Pauling table has a dipole structure to it.

The importance of these tables is that they give insights into the possible structures of atoms. Apparently, the electron structure follows different binding rules than the nuclear structure. It also appears Pauling was right in that clusters might form within the nucleus. These clusters would be helium, oxygen, and other strongly bound atoms. But there are likely dozens of clusters with varying degrees of stability.

What interests me about Pauling's table is that the known magic numbers associated with the nucleus stand out as the final fill nucleon for each Ma series and the first couple Mb series of atoms.

It is my hope that publishing these two periodic tables will interest and enable others to join with me in trying to perfect the electron binding energy equation and discover the nuclear binding energy equation. This would be solid progress in physics and cement the Aether Physics Model as a valid paradigm.

Thanks for the words of welcome.

[SteveA]

Thanks for the reply. It's interesting to consider the possible differences between nuclear and electron orbital forms.

I've had some ideas along the lines of an aether as well though more in terms of closed loop motions in a discrete spacial lattice. Basically, if we take any closed volume of space and describe motions within it, it ends up being the equivalent of a continual reordering of elements in a 1 dimensional space and the significant properties appear to be the (orbital) period or (wave) length of each of these loops and that's a structure we could map to any form of mapping of a conserved quantity of information (so it's a very general perspective and doesn't specifically apply to a physical space).

This also equates to resonant structures and ends up with everything related to a spectrum of frequencies. It appears that synchronizations in these motions over time naturally give rise to an appear of complex objects that could be seen similar to a harmonic structure of a fundamental frequency (and I believe these are how orbital shells arise) common divisors of these wavelengths can appear to make these related/connected informationally and this is how I assume atomic bonds are formed.

As a rough example for an aether model, assume there exists some smallest quanta. If we encapsulate some volume of space and had structures flowing within a conserved volume without external energy input, then everything moves in closed pathways that could be described as various quantum units in length (so you could image a flowing super fluid in an perfect bottle, for example)

An observational point must intersection every one of the loops that are observable, hence all these loops pass through a single point and we can now see this similar to a layered magnetic field around an observer, or a toroidal vortex in a fluid:



Each ring has a specific quantum period of some length 1,2,3,4,... etc.

We can find that any lengths sharing a common divisor appear to interact and for example a length 4 and length 6 loop share a common divisor of 2 and the total appear length of their combined influences appears as 4*6/gcd(4,6)=24/2=12.

This 2:1 compression I believe is associated with what we observe as an atomic bonding force between two orbital shells. If the lengths of these loops are relatively prime, then they share no common factors and knowing the state or phase of one loop gives us no information regarding the other - hence those appear to be similar to being neutral relative to each other.

Here's an example of an image I generated by using sweeping 2 such wavelengths (a function of these determines the X and Y coordinates of each point in the image) and I believe I used a total of 3 wavelengths in generating this image and the algorithm is simulating some additional effects to generate the color scheme (which I tweaked some at the end to give it a more "natural" coloring), but this is basically showing a computation of the greatest common divisor algorithm but between 3 wavelengths:



If you look closely toward the left edge, you'll see a vertical line of symmetry, that's the symmetry of swapping gcd(a,b)=gcd(b,a), but it's basically simulating properties of resonance within a quantized superfluid space intersecting at an observation point.

[Mikal]

Beautiful Steve!!

Thanks Volantis, is there anyway you could further describe Aether geometry??

Sorry I can't add much here, I am learning... but very interested in the subject matter.


Regards Mikal

[volantis]

Thanks Volantis, is there anyway you could further describe Aether geometry??

Hi Mikal,

Aether geometry is geometry created as a result of the spin structures of Aether. You can read more about it here and here.

[SteveA]

Nice of you to provide more details. Some of the advertisements on the right over the article, but I grabbed a comment I thought was great:

assume there is a space-resonance cluster containing number of Aether units.

Sounds much like my comment above as well.

it's basically simulating properties of resonance within a quantized superfluid space intersecting at an observation point

To break it down even further, at it's lowest level it should resemble a number line, "warped spacetime" is similar to filling a space with a 1-D string that acts like an aether. That ties together mathematics, quantum mechanics, relativity, string theory and much more.

Here's a simulation to consider as well. Imagine if the "thin thread model" they use for this was actually just a single string of objects for the entire collection (notice that motions in the universe share a single reference for time and need to be related in at least 1 property continuously and effectively instantaneously):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TK3BGOaQu2k

[volantis]

Nice of you to provide more details. Some of the advertisements on the right over the article...

To break it down even further, at it's lowest level it should resemble a number line, "warped spacetime" is similar to filling a space with a 1-D string that acts like an aether. That ties together mathematics, quantum mechanics, relativity, string theory and much more.

Here's a simulation to consider as well. Imagine if the "thin thread model" they use for this was actually just a single string of objects for the entire collection (notice that motions in the universe share a single reference for time and need to be related in at least 1 property continuously and effectively instantaneously):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TK3BGOaQu2k

Thanks for the heads up on my site formatting. I fixed the overlap.

If you hadn't provided the link to the video, I would have had no clue what you were talking about. But now I see it, and wow, what a great demonstration!

Yes, the Aether granularity is exactly the same as the thin thread model, but at a lower level of physical reality. The video demonstrates a single condition for a hypothetical molecule. The rules would need to be changed to accommodate the Aether structure, but it would provide an instructive demonstration of various aspects of Aether mechanics.

Another feature of the Aether structures is that they are fractals. The patterns repeat at intervals exactly equal to 16pi^2. This is not an artifact of the formula, but rather an artifact of spin structures. I wish I had the programming skills to replicate the thin thread model demonstration.

[Mikal]

Hi Mikal,

Aether geometry is geometry created as a result of the spin structures of Aether. You can read more about it here and here.

Thanks Volantis...I had a peek...oh..oh...it looks like intriguing reading so you have probably hooked me..lol..
I surely will apply myself to a good read here! I just read abit and sincerely I like your clarity!

Regards Mikal