Tuck's Theory of Everything!

[stephentuck25]

Mr. Christie, I like your style! We may be in disagreement, but maybe someday we will be on the same page when this final chapter in Physics is written. It would definately be a day to celebrate when mankind understands the great secrets of the universe. I would still encourage you to read my work because you are of great intelligence. It's been fun having someone to challenge my ideas in such ways! If you have any suggested theories I should view then let me know. I plan to aquaint myself with the ideas of others in this community. I'm still very new on this site.

[stephentuck25]

In retrospect, I have said I thought that Space, Mass, and Time were forms of Kinetic Energy. Perhaps Kinetic gives the wrong connotation. In the universe really all mass and energy is in motion. It is hard not to imagine energy in motion. It isn't meant as a designation between Kinetic and Potential energy. Even a body at rest isn't at rest in reference to another one (at least over vast distanced) if you believe that the universe is expanding. Evidence suggests that everything is increasingly moving away from us. When mass converts into Space, I believe it has lost all internal kinetic energy (Time). It has been said that anti-matter looks like normal matter with a negative Time component.

I just had a brilliant idea! Since normal matter converts into Space, then Anti-Matter could convert into Space. I think this is what happened during creation that explains the asemmetry of matter to anti-matter. Virtual Particles appear as Particle/Anti-particle pairs from Space. That means that Matter and Anti-matter neutralize each other's internal kinetic energy, thus converting back into Space. However, black holes are a process that also neutralize the Time component and transforms Mass into Space.

Here is some supporting evidence:

On page 118-119 of his biography of Richard Feynman "Genius" (Pantheon books, New York, 1992), James Gleick recounts a meeting between Feynman, J. A. Wheeler, and Albert Einstein in which the three of them agree that the fundamental equations describing the absorption and emission of light waves by atoms are symmetric with respect to the sign of the time parameter - that is, there is no directionality of "time's arrow" at the microscopic level of phenomena; it is only at the macroscopic level that the irreversible character of time begins to assert itself, and then for no other reason than probability.

[stephentuck25]

Hawking Radiation could have also contributed because one of the Virtual Particle/Anti-Particle pairs falls into the black hole while the other one is set free. This could have contributed to the assemetry of matter to anti-matter and ensured that there was matter present within the universe. Once one form dominated the mix, then any remaining anti-particles would be neutralized with matter to form space and left a universe dominated by matter. It would be interesting to know if Hawking Radiation has any bias.

[austintorn@aol.com]

What about the jets we see coming out of blacks holes?

Could there be other jets, unseen?

Since the universe is here now, at any old time, one that is not special, it would be that the eternal universe recycles itself, over some very long period of time.

Could black holes be some kind of galactic fountain, spewing out hydrogen and more, or guarks and gluons, that then form into stars, which fuse into the higher elements, etc., for a new beginning?

[William Christie]

Mr. Christie, I like your style! We may be in disagreement, but maybe someday we will be on the same page when this final chapter in Physics is written. It would definately be a day to celebrate when mankind understands the great secrets of the universe. I would still encourage you to read my work because you are of great intelligence. It's been fun having someone to challenge my ideas in such ways! If you have any suggested theories I should view then let me know. I plan to aquaint myself with the ideas of others in this community. I'm still very new on this site.

For my rotating wave idea, I've posted it on TOE theories here and you can see it at:
http://mypage.direct.ca/c/christie/Wavicle.html

It is also and www.wbabin.net and you can see the animation Electron as Wave (under Christie) to give you a quick idea.

Whether it is right or wrong is another thing. If it is not thrown on the table, then it will not be there. There is mimickry in the universe, just like there are common language symbols. That comes from deep down long ago. You can see it in the coincidences that pop up. Pick away at it and we might find the diamond in the rock. Our pick tools are concepts as well as hardware and they can be levered with the connections we make with all our knowledge.

Long ago I was accused of not understanding relativity. I just had to see it to believe it and then I would accept the math. I really think physics needs this lesson relearned yet again. Concepts must be clear and well founded. The math can follow, but eventually it must be there. The language must be consistent because it is complicated enough. So please say space is space; not matter. You can define a relationship like E=mc2 - that is okay.

My suggestion: read Beyond Einstein/Michio Kaku - it is a great overview of physics up to present.

[austintorn@aol.com]

Space and matter may be closer than one thinks, although space is still kind of a place for the lumps of stuff; it's just that space might be thinly spread out stuff.

The void pulsates in a structured sequence.
A field is present throughout space immense,
Out of which all particles may condense—
Occurring where the field’s extremely intense.

Atoms are just bundles of inertia,
Knots in the field and fabric of space;
Yet matter defines the structure of space…
The Yin is in the Yang, and vice-versa!

It could even be that there is naught but space and curved space, matter being spectacularly curved in time, with energy / energy density essentially being time, and the polarity of charge being/forming the two opposite halves of space that even nullify all existence, but only in the overview, as that condition in the absolute would be perfectly unstable.

[William Christie]

Yes, indeed it could be that thinly spread out stuff is space.
Maybe we have to think beyond waves and put them in place.

[stephentuck25]

I'll definately check out that link. It is my Theory that black holes convert infallen mass into space. I think you might be fascinated with all the evidence in my paper that supports this conclusion. They are seperate entities, but nobody really knew that matter converted into energy before Einstein's equation either. I don't subscribe to String Theory as Kaku supports because I believe Quantum Mechanics is based on a flawed model. I believe it successfully describes reality by using the power of the mathematics of probability. However, I believe that the universe is discrete. So many theories require all these dimensions that cannot be seen. I think that it is a sure way to tell a theory is flawed when it has to rely on artificial constructs like extra unseen spatial dimensions. That's what Quantum Mechanics that depends on superposition does to theories in order to make the illogical logical.

[austintorn@aol.com]

…I don't subscribe to String Theory as Kaku supports because I believe Quantum Mechanics is based on a flawed model. I believe it successfully describes reality by using the power of the mathematics of probability. However, I believe that the universe is discrete. So many theories require all these dimensions that cannot be seen. I think that it is a sure way to tell a theory is flawed when it has to rely on artificial constructs like extra unseen spatial dimensions. That's what Quantum Mechanics that depends on superposition does to theories in order to make the illogical logical.

AMENDING IMMATERIAL SCIENCE

Science itself has gone off
Into some mystical and phantasmagorical areas
Such as” “spooky action at a distance”,
The ending of reality at quantum levels
And also within black holes,
Statistical/random probability basis of events,
Bell’s nonlocality, aether wind, etc.,
And so we hope to counter
Such mystical imaginations herein,
For example, such as by showing
That matter/fields are not at all distinct
But form a continuum, and more,
Demonstrating that all is real,
As well as what is absolute and what isn’t.


Action at a Distance

Quantum theory has some
Grotesquely erroneous interpretations of nature,
Such as its distortion of the field
In order to still have discrete particles,
Which must then exchange virtuals
Such as virtual photons (Coulomb force)
Or gravitons (gravity)
To accomplish action at a distance
(A phenomenon that has
Puzzled physicists for centuries).

However, the nonphysical agent
That controls the emission and absorption
Of the virtuals would seem to be inscrutable.

An electron and a proton may combine
To produce a hydrogen atom,
Emitting a photon with a few electron volts,
Which is 13.6 for the ground state.

Since energy is always conserved,
The only energy going in is
What was present in the first place:
The rest energy of the electron and the proton.
There is nothing else.

Since a hydrogen atom’s mass
Is slightly less than the sum of the masses
Of the isolated electron and proton
This accounts for the energy
Given off in the photon.
There is no need for any other explanation
Such as involving electrostatic potential energy.

As for gravitons, they are so elusive
That quarks would be easy
To isolate by comparison;
However, they are inconsistent
With Einstein’s profoundly successful depiction
Of a gravitational field
As a space-time distortion,
Yet, to be fair, Einstein gave no reason
For why space is curved near a mass;
It just is, so this kind of sacrifices
The physicality of gravitational fields
By decoupling them from rest energy.

When molecules, atoms, or particles
Approach an object, especially a massive one,
They cannot maintain
Their increasing kinetic energy
And so they typically emit radiant energy
Into space (such as the case
Of an accretion disk around a black hole).
The ultimate source for this radiatio
Must be the rest mass of the incident matter.
Like the Coulomb potential
In the hydrogen atom,
There is no other source.

Matter is not distinct from the field it generates;
Matter/field is a continuum.
The gravitational field an object produces
Is as physically real as it is.

So it is that electrons and protons
Are not really point-like particles
(Or quark points), for this would have
All of the rest energy stored
In an infinitely small volume,
Giving it near to infinite energy density
That would even make it
A gravitational singularity.
Plus, if point-like, why would an electron
And a proton in proximity incur a change
In the energy stored in
Their infinitely small regions?

Another nonstarter would be the concept
Of electrons and protons as probability waves
Propagating through space
With their very existence dependent
On interaction with other particles or photons.

Well, while not totally ruled out,
These explanations are neither compelling
Nor enlightening, but are still fantasies,
As they have no real explanation,
Plus why circumvent the simplest explanation
For action at a distance:
The energy of a particle’s rest mass
Is distributed through space.
When two particles interact at a distance
It is because bits of the the energy density
Of their respective rest masses coexist there.

The source of any radiating energy,
Such as in the making of a hydrogen atom,
Is the interacting particles’ fields,
Its magnitude dependent on
The spacial separation between the particles.

The wave functions of atomic energy levels
In quantum physics are
A glimpse of energy’s distributed composition,
For Nature is a continuum,
As we will hope to show more of.

Compartmentalizing properties of particles
By reducing them to points
By some (old) physicists only causes them
To later try to recombine the pieces
In the search for a unified field theory.

A particle is a certain amount of energy
With a single distributed substructure
That generates all of its properties.
Matter and its fields are inseparable.

There can really be no enigmatic processes
Accounting for action at a distance,
For these cannot escape
The conservation of energy,
As all forms have the same level of realness.

Field/matter duality dictates
That a system’s maximum negative field potential
Is equal to its available rest energy.
This will be called the Maxfield constraint.

[William Christie]

"When two particles interact at a distance it is because bits of the the energy density of their respective rest masses coexist there.

Hey Austin, I proposed a rotating planar wave that diverges in EM strength and thus goes faster at greater radii. That allows interaction at a distance and creates the "curvature of space". It's the only way I can see a rotating wave work.