Tuck's Theory of Everything!

[stephentuck25]

I realized something earlier today about Length Contraction. There was an apparent contradiction in my mind. I hadn't given it much thought before, but I started associating photonic-string length directly to Length Contraction. I did this because energy is equivalent to length and a contraction naturally means that something is getting smaller. However, in the Tuck-Einstein Equation, you get the Length Contraction equation when you move the Lorentz transformation over to the left-hand side with Energy. As velocity increases, the Energy measured becomes a smaller fraction (since it is a numerator over a denominator that is subtracted from one). The energy being measured is not wavelength (mass, the space-component). The energy is kinetic energy (frequency, the time-component). See while E=mc^2 is called the Mass-Energy Equivalence equation, energy in that equation is actually that of frequency (kinetic energy). The energy released from an atomic bomb is obviously in the form of kinetic energy rather than matter (which is simply a different state of energy), as it gives the transformation from mass to kinetic energy. Anyways, that means that Length Contraction corresponds to Time-Dilation. As an object approaches relativistic velocities, there is Mass-Increase and Time-Dilation. The Mass-Increase means that the photonic-string length (or essentially wavelength) increases in length because kinetic energy transforms into mass. In fact, it appears that there may be a real effect on length in the direction-of-motion at relativistic speeds in accordance with scientific observation.

[stephentuck25]

You know, an object expands as it heats (high-frequency energy) and contracts as it cools. Length of an object is defined by the kinetic energy of the object. Although, the photonic-string length (wavelength) is the opposite. It increases length in the conversion of frequency to mass. That is why to Electromagnetic Spectrum is between Planck Mass and Planck Length. The universe loves to play these psychological tricks with your sense of reality (you are like Alice in Wonderland). While the photonic-string length (mass) increases, the energy of the string decreases (leading to the contraction of objects). That is why it is important to rely on an understanding of the mathematical description of the universe!

[labelwench]

You know, an object expands as it heats (high-frequency energy) and contracts as it cools. Length of an object is defined by the kinetic energy of the object. Although, the photonic-string length (wavelength) is the opposite. It increases length in the conversion of frequency to mass. That is why to Electromagnetic Spectrum is between Planck Mass and Planck Length. The universe loves to play these psychological tricks with your sense of reality (you are like Alice in Wonderland). While the photonic-string length (mass) increases, the energy of the string decreases (leading to the contraction of objects). That is why it is important to rely on an understanding of the mathematical description of the universe!

Then, there is water, which expands as it cools.

How does the math account for that?

Relax. Near as I know, science is still working on that little anomaly, water being the basis for life and all that other stuff....

[spacedout]

I realized something earlier today about Length Contraction. There was an apparent contradiction in my mind. I hadn't given it much thought before, but I started associating photonic-string length directly to Length Contraction. I did this because energy is equivalent to length and a contraction naturally means that something is getting smaller. However, in the Tuck-Einstein Equation, you get the Length Contraction equation when you move the Lorentz transformation over to the left-hand side with Energy. As velocity increases, the Energy measured becomes a smaller fraction (since it is a numerator over a denominator that is subtracted from one). The energy being measured is not wavelength (mass, the space-component). The energy is kinetic energy (frequency, the time-component). See while E=mc^2 is called the Mass-Energy Equivalence equation, energy in that equation is actually that of frequency (kinetic energy). The energy released from an atomic bomb is obviously in the form of kinetic energy rather than matter (which is simply a different state of energy), as it gives the transformation from mass to kinetic energy. Anyways, that means that the Length Contraction corresponds to Time-Dilation. As an object approaches relativistic velocities, there is Mass-Increase and Time-Dilation. The Mass-Increase means that the photonic-string length (or essentially wavelength) increases in length because kinetic energy transforms into mass. In fact, it appears that there may be a real effect on length in the direction-of-motion at relativistic speeds in accordance with scientific observation.

I still can't decide if there is a Lorentz shrinkage due to light being a wave in absolute space of if light is just a particle in De Broglie's matter waves operating with momentum mc without a background. There has to be a background or there would be a "twin paradox" in which each twin moving away from one another would say the other persons clock is running slower--not possible. "Lorentz's contractions" is the easiest theory to work with a solid footing in fixed space or aether. I believe space is filled with boxes or cells and passing from box to box is the cause of a Planck length which is constant do to slowing of relative time when moving through space {there is a problem though a Planck length would change when traveling in different directions. The contraction would occur when a photon moves forward and then back as the system moves leaving a shrinkage in the field. I find it interresting that the spectrum is the same for all observers from any planet but sees other systems having a red shift.

[stephentuck25]

Then, there is water, which expands as it cools.

How does the math account for that?

Relax. Near as I know, science is still working on that little anomaly, water being the basis for life and all that other stuff....

Personally, I think that it has to do with the way water crystallizes as a solid due to it's charge characteristics. In this way, it would be due to kinetic energy and geometry causing the lower density. The molecule itself exhibits this behavior and not the individual elements. It is good though to find inconsistancies in order to test theories. Mathematically the Tuck-Einstein equation is somewhat limited to what it can describe. It would take simulations using the "Equation of Everything" to really provide such explainations.

[labelwench]

I still can't decide if there is a Lorentz shrinkage due to light being a wave in absolute space of if light is just a particle in De Broglie's matter waves operating with momentum mc without a background. There has to be a background or there would be a "twin paradox" in which each twin moving away from one another would say the other persons clock is running slower--not possible. "Lorentz's contractions" is the easiest theory to work with a solid footing in fixed space or aether. I believe space is filled with boxes or cells and passing from box to box is the cause of a Planck length which is constant do to slowing of relative time when moving through space {there is a problem though a Planck length would change when traveling in different directions. The contraction would occur when a photon moves forward and then back as the system moves leaving a shrinkage in the field. I find it interresting that the spectrum is the same for all observers from any planet but sees other systems having a red shift.

I'm not indicating that I agree with your speculation, merely indicating that your effort has been read and your contribution appreciated. For my part, I do not consider space to be 'empty', merely a medium of extremely low density with some yet to be discovered properties, I speculate.

The great 'nothing' is 'something'.

What it is, has yet to be determined.

Just my thoughts prior to morning tea....

[stephentuck25]

You know, I don't know that I should share the "Equation of Everything" even after I have derived it. The world is so ruled by greed and corruption. I'm afraid of putting such a powerful tool into the hands of such an evil world. My great scientific accomplishments are purposely ignored and suppressed by the academic community, while my talents are wasted on menial work (enslaved to the system). I'm doing the greatest work in Theoretical Physics for free so that nothing really changes and some high-ranking Physicists can someday steal credit for my work. What's the incentive for me to give something to a world that won't appreciate or understand the awesome responsibility that the knowledge carries with it? With that equation, I could dominate every field of technology and make right the wrongs of this world. I would be an absolute fool to place my trust in the world!

[stephentuck25]

I've come to a new realization about length. My Tuck-Einstein equation says that the Energy variable is Length because it is equivocal to the Length Contraction equation. Both Space (wavelength) and Time (frequency) are components of Energy. Now imagine a subatomic particle such as an electron. It is like a ball of yarn (being a photonic-string manifold). Anyways, its size is defined by both its wavelength (photonic-string length, mass) and its frequency (string vibrations). When infrared photons (heat) strikes particles, it adds a little mass and a frequency energy (that is absorbed). It isn't as penetrating as higher-frequency photons that bounce off particles without being absorbed. This causes the orbit and slightly the diameter of the particle to change. This leads to expansion or contraction of objects (particularly metals that are conductive) and phase changes when the forces overcome structural bonds.

I believe that water is an exception because its molecules are dissociative (splitting into ions) that yields a higher freedom of movement (thus increasing density due to interleaving). The Plasma phase for instance has gas in an ionized form. However, I believe that lower temperature causes crystallization and bond strengthening that alters the geometry (yielding an overall expansion). At least, that is a theory of mine.

[stephentuck25]

I sent the message below to arXiv.org:

My name is Stephen Tuck and I am having problems with the registration process. I do not have an affiliation with a college or university and it won't allow me to create a user account for publication of my great scientific work (using a free email account). I've accomplished the most incredible things in Theoretical Physics. I have done what Ph.D. Physicists have not been able to do (without a college degree). See the problem with institutionalized academia is that it closes the doors of Science to contributions from the general population. This is an unfair practice that is detrimental to the advancement of Science and technology. In fact, Elsevier Nuclear Physics B rejected my work stating that it was "outside the scope of the journal" in which they had the exact category for my work under "Special Relativity" and referred me to Foundations of Physics which is the "leading scientific journal for matters controversial in Physics." I may further try seeking publication with them, but I would like to pursue publication in your journal when I have the chance to update my progress with my equation in a formalized technical paper.

I know this might sound crazy, but I've been given the genius that Einstein had probably to a greater degree. Really, however it shouldn't be surprising that someday a human would rival or eclipse even the abilities of Einstein. Also, out of the billions of people on earth, really what is the likelihood that the next Einstein will be a Ph.D. Physicist? His genius (as well as mine) is largely an evolutionary advantage from Neanderthal Hybridization into the species. We both share a common ancestral lineage that left an anatomical mark on us. We both were given a bump on the back of our heads called an "occipital protuberance" or "occipital bun." Mine comes from my recessive redhead gene and his from his Jewish genetics. I know that I am the true successor to Einstein. I have completed his work on the true "Theory of Everything," but am still working on learning the mathematics required to successfully derive the "Equation of Everything."

I understand the greatest mysteries of the universe such as what a black hole does. My initial theory was that matter falling into a black hole converts into Space, causing the accelerated expansion of the universe. From there I figured out my Tuck-Einstein Equation that has been the Navistar guiding my scientific work. I know the substructure of elementary particles such as electrons (photonic-string manifold) and quarks, the boundaries of the Electromagnetic Spectrum (Planck Mass and Planck Length), the flaws in Quantum Mechanics, the geometry of the universe (a conic section), what is length, what the Fine Structure Constant means, and so much more.

Anyways while I realize your time is limited, so is mine. I haven't been paid anything for any of my great intellectual achievements that I've done my spare time. Therefore, I have to work full-time (currently as a truck driver) and then fight for the equal right of publication in a scientific journal so that my work can be embraced and recognized by the academic community. Additionally, my abilities and knowledge have come to me at great personal sacrifice. I am striving for the technological advancement of mankind and having to fight the entire academic world!

"Strength of Mind and Strength of Heart; Question Everything and Trust No-one!" - Stephen Tuck

[labelwench]

May I make a suggestion, Stephen?

Write and publish your own book, then there will never be any question of the authorship of your ideas.

The following link takes you to a free program that allows you to use their software to layout and edit your book while it saves the data on your own computer.
Once you are done writing the book, they will publish it for you, one copy even, although they do offer volume discounts.

http://www.blurb.com/create/book/pricing#color-trade

You can even apply for an ISBN and sell your book through their store, only printing as orders are received. No overhead and no inventory.

I can speak to the quality of the work because my husband created a picture-book of our journey together for my birthday last year. I have started a book on horses, lol, but have only gotten as far as the cover and working title. I am still formatting in my mind what message I wish to convey. I have no doubt that I will sell some, possibly many, because horses are a beloved topic and the Yukon is a special place. Therefore I want to be certain that my first offering 'knocks 'em dead' and then I shall have a secondary career for my dotage.

Everything in it's proper time.