Theory of Everything

[Mohsen]

www.universaltheory.org

This is a cosmological model for theory of everything. it is built based on most recent academic physical experiments and findings. This theory views singularity as a seperate entity and offers solution for incompatibilities between general relativity and quantum mechanics. It also has a suggestion for the origin of dark energy which is responsible for expansion of universe, inherent in its principles.

It also views Mind as seperate entity and part of the tripod to obtain deeper underestanding of reality. Present knowlege links mind through Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics and holonomic brain theory to physical world. This is explored further

[Rufus]

Mohsen

Linked to your site. Have to absorb the first three pages but it sounds very open. So far I like what I see.

Rufe

[dleviwing]

Dr. Kermanshahi;
Though I agree with much of what you say on you web site, I feel your tripod of reality will not perform as you would like. I do disagree with your statement that there are "No Absolutes". There are actually 4 absolutes when you strip away the nonsense incorporated in the explanations of our mathematical gauge theories: "Absolute Time", "Absolute Space (cosmological void)", "Absolute Matter (stuff of the universe)", and "Absolute Motion". Absolute motion appears in many equations but is overlooked as being a fix quantity for all matter in structural form.
Best regards;
dleviwing

[Mohsen]

Dear Dleviwing;

I had as much difficulty reading and writting your name as probably you had while trying to write my name.
Any way, I beleive, we have to lean on the scientistific findings and experiments which have been done through the years. As Steven Hawking said we are sitting on the shoulder of giants.
About the presence of absolutes that you mentioned, Einstein's Special Relativity tells us that time and motion is relative. Almost a century has passed and nobody could effectively dispute his theory. I am sure NASA is utilizing and considering this notions in it's experiments.
Also, Big Bang Theory indicates that time and space started at the beginning of universe and is expanding along the way. This theory also is widely accepted and not disputed effectively.
Standard model of particle physics has been tested for more than half a century in cyclotrons and colliders all over the world. It shows how sub-atomic particles are not absolute and how they are subject to change. As a matter of fact the model suggests that particles do not posses the main characteristic of matter which is mass by themselves. They obtain mass by interaction with higgs field.
The only way that we can go against,the current findings and theories is by offering equal scientific reasons and proof. Otherwise, we have to rely and accept the findings of human race which is obtained through constant and meticulous efforts of our scientists.

Regards;

Mohsen

[Mohsen]

Dear Quanta;
I guess I addressed your comments in the reply to dleviwing. The reason that you take, time, space, motion and mass as absolutes is because you feel them with your sences. Scientists normally use tools that expands the domain of their senses. such as microscope etc. The findings are not just intuitions, rather they are mainly derived from reproducable experiments obtained by human sences. Althought there is a interpretation error factor which nobody can help it but one can dispute it.

Regards;

Mohsen

[dleviwing]

Dear Dr. Kermanshahi;
I think Q7 and I know vary well the difference between scientific instrumentation and human senses. My comments were not invoked by emotion, only scientific analysis; one of the hazards of my former profession. Good luck with your theory.
Regards;
David (dleviwing)