It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Member Articles > TOE Theory Articles
Reload this Page true final theory by true science
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Comment
 
LinkBack Article Tools Display Modes
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->true final theory by true science<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
true final theory by true science
next level of science by true science
Published by truedreamm
11-27-2006
Thumbs up Introduction

What is the true purpose of science?

The true purpose of science is to first understand nature and next help humanity.

Did present science help us to understand nature completely?
No, there are so many gaps in between science and nature. There are so many mysteries and questions about nature.
First we don’t know the clear basic of atom.
Present basic laws of science are only best module for our observation, but these basic laws don’t explain what the reason for our observation is.
Present science is very good in the field of electronic science; Electronic science is 95% man made science.


Some of the mysteries about nature


What was the true reason for cause of ice age at the time of high temperature in sun? What is the true reason for present global warming?
Truly what is true mass and truly what is gravity?
Truly what causes anything to have mass?
What is true reason for accretion disc jets such as the nuclei of alive galaxies emit relativistic jets along their polar axes?
What is the true reason for pioneer anomaly, what cause the apparent residual sunward acceleration of the pioneer space craft?
Did, compass is truly showing only earths magnetic field and what is the true reason for changes of earths magnetic field for many times?
What is true reason for sea floor is spreading only at center of ocean?
What is true reason for lightning likes to strike on the land?
What is reason for tilt of 11 degree in our earth’s magnetic field?
What is true reason forPluto's orbit is highly eccentric. At times it is closer to the Sun than Neptune (as it was from January 1979 thru February 11 1999). Why Pluto rotates in the opposite direction from most of the other planets? Truly what is black hole?

The Standard Model is a good theory. Experiments have verified its predictions to incredible precision, and all the particles predicted by this theory have been found. But it does not explain everything. For example, gravity is not included in the Standard Model.

Ok, let us create an end to all of our mysteries about nature and science by true science.

Let us start our next level of science by true science.


Contents

Latest 5 articles

Article Tools

Featured Articles
Read more
THE 1984 WAR: A War of Perception

A Conquest of the United States
<< <    Next Page: big shock (Page 1 of 13)    >  >>
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
 
By dleviwing on 11-27-2006, 04:25 PM
Re: true final theory by true science

Muthu;
I find it hard to believe you do not know the meaning of “MASS”. If you move an atom to the far reaches of space away from any significant influence of gravitational forces, the atom would still have the same mass as it did while on the Earth. Mass is based on the inertia property of matter and not on the influence of gravitational phenomena. I think you may be confusing the mass of an object with the weight of an object. If this is so, then I can assume your degree is not in a field of engineering that requires you to acquire a solid understanding of physics. You may wish to refer to my blog “Toronics” and “The Toronic Paradigm” entry; it explains mass in terms of “Rest mass”, “Relative mass”, and “Gravitational mass”. The concept of mass IS NOT WRONG; only the interpretation of the numbers and cause is in question.

The rest of your article is also in question since not all planets have a magnetic field. You have made several errors that a basic physics text book would correct for you.
Regards;
David
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #1 (permalink)  
By theunify on 11-27-2006, 05:28 PM
Re: true final theory by true science

Quote:
Originally Posted by theunify
[]I find it hard to believe the magnetic field particles are as big as pictured in your theory. What is the scale?

JonDWoodward
[b]theunify article physics to physic, thank.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
By truedreamm on 11-27-2006, 11:45 PM
Re: true final theory by true science


the meaning of “MASS”.
The concept of mass IS NOT WRONG; only the interpretation of the numbers and cause is in question.


hello my friend
thanks for your intrest and you idea
even, i am not saying mass is completly wrong , only understanding of mass is wrong
i our next level we will face to make changes to mass number in our perodic table.

eg : the mass number of iron is 55.85 and mass number of hydrogen is 1.008

what is say is we must only change mass number of hydrogen in to -1.008

then you will be able to understand true behind nature
even check
tomorrow
my artical basic of final theory in my site

thank you,

www.truesci.com


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
By truedreamm on 11-28-2006, 03:09 AM
Re: true final theory by true science

Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing View Post
Muthu;
I find it hard to believe you do not know the meaning of “MASS”. If you move an atom to the far reaches of space away from any significant influence of gravitational forces, the atom would still have the same mass as it did while on the Earth. Mass is based on the inertia property of matter and not on the influence of gravitational phenomena. I think you may be confusing the mass of an object with the weight of an object. If this is so, then I can assume your degree is not in a field of engineering that requires you to acquire a solid understanding of physics. You may wish to refer to my blog “Toronics” and “The Toronic Paradigm” entry; it explains mass in terms of “Rest mass”, “Relative mass”, and “Gravitational mass”. The concept of mass IS NOT WRONG; only the interpretation of the numbers and cause is in question.

The rest of your article is also in question since not all planets have a magnetic field. You have made several errors that a basic physics text book would correct for you.
Regards;
David
hello,david
i am mainly talking about, nuclear mass the mass or weight of the nucleus proper;but it is often called the atomic mass or atomic weight which would rather mean the mass or weight of the whole atom.
ok,why did not electrons have mass or nearly mass less
did you know the answer ?, but i have given the answer for this
question in my article.

regards
muthu
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
By mkirkpatrick on 11-28-2006, 05:47 PM
Smile Re: true final theory by true science

Muthu,
I have just very briefly looked at your work,but as i am away from home at present,i will
leave any further comment until i return home next week.
Thank you for the pm you sent me.

regards michael.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
By dleviwing on 11-28-2006, 06:39 PM
Re: true final theory by true science

Muthu;
Atomic weight is a function on the periodic table that references all elements to hydrogen. At the time, it was not known that hydrogen had an isotope (deuterium). You shouldn’t confuse “atomic weight” with mass value even though it is basically a count of proton/electron equivalence. This is a chemistry thing and not a pure physics approach to mass. The notion that the atom would not change its mass nor its atomic weight is still true regardless of where in the space of the universe you wish to put it. I do agree that the numbers do not actually represent a quantitative measure of fundamental substance.
Regards;
David
Last edited by dleviwing : 11-29-2006 at 12:38 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
By truedreamm on 11-29-2006, 03:22 AM
Re: true final theory by true science

hello, david
the basic of true theory of every thing is chemistry+physics, theory of every thing must
answer all the questions about nature.

what is true reason for global warming?

global warming or global warning from nature?

you need true answer for this question , then it is possible by only
true science.



regards
muthu
Last edited by truedreamm : 12-11-2007 at 10:40 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
By truedreamm on 11-30-2006, 12:50 AM
Re: true final theory by true science

is there any magnet experts in our group, i need some more feedback

regards
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
By Infinite Consciousness on 12-01-2006, 03:50 PM
Re: true final theory by true science

Quote:
Originally Posted by truedreamm View Post
is there any magnet experts in our group, i need some more feedback

regards
truedreamer, you have not addressed what magnetism "IS" how can you know or understand magnetism - unless and until you know what it is ?

What feedback do you feel you need ?

One of the great benefits of magnetism is that it demonstrates by incontestable facts the spirituality and immortality of the soul; and these things once made certain, God is manifested to all intelligences and all hearts. Thereafter, from the belief in God and from the harmonies of creation we are led to that great spiritual harmony ...

... It follows from this revelation of the ancient world that clairvoyant extasis is a voluntary and immediate application of the soul to the universal fire, or rather to that light --- abounding in images --- which radiates, which speaks and circulates about all objects and every sphere of the universe.

This application is operated by the persistence of will liberated from the senses and fortified by a succession of tests. Herein consisted the beginning in the light, the adept became a seer or prophet; then having established communications between this light and his own will, he learned to direct the former, even as the head of an arrow is set in a certain direction.

The Astral Light as a whole (not going into expression as the mind), that element of electricity and lightning, can be placed at the disposal of human will.

Animated beings are in fact, incarnations of light. The Astral Light is the living soul of the earth, a material and fatal soul, controlled in its productions and movements by the eternal laws of equilibrium ... (i.e. magnetism.)

This light, which environs and permeates all bodies, can also suspend their weight and make them revolve about a powerfully absorbent center . . .

To understand the cause of this force, but never to be obsessed and never overcome thereby, is to trample on the serpent's head. In such secrets are contained all the mysteries of magnetism, which name can indeed be applied to the whole part of - antique Transcendental Power.

Magnetism is the wand of miracles, but it is this for initiates only ; for rash and uninstructed people, who would sport with it or make it subserve their passions, it is as dangerous as that consuming glory which, according to the allegorical fable, destroyed the too ambitious Semele in the embraces of Jupiter.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Comment



Currently Active Users Viewing This Article: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Article Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new articles
You may not post comments
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Article Article Starter Category Comments Last Post
An Intro to what Supertrings are james l. digol String Theory 29 07-03-2008 02:07 PM
WELCOME TO THE GENERAL THEORY CLUB Serge Patlavskiy Theory Characteristics 3 09-11-2007 10:18 PM
A Real Theory of Everything Tesla TOE Theories 15 01-11-2007 05:35 AM
The Mathematico-Cognition Reality Theory (MCRT) mjgeddes TOE Theory Articles 11 02-10-2006 09:08 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com

Article powered by GARS 2.1.8m ©2005-2006