"Obviously 4-D Matter is not Expanding".

Tesla TOE Member Quest Prime Numbers

The Steady State Theory was abandoned because it was unable to explain how the universe would remain at a generally uniform density while at the same time becoming ever larger, spatially.
Hoyle-Bondi & Gold, at first (desperately; because everything else about the Steady State theory is an eloquently strong account of the observed, universal status quo) proposed the *'spontaneous creation of hydrogen' to maintain the required uniform density of their Steady State universe. This reparative course was later abandoned, mainly because it contradicts the law of Conservation of MassEnergy.

Whereas, the four dimensional space time continuum requires no such *adjustment - an adjustment that does indeed (prohibitively) contradict the Law of Conservation of Mass Energy.
Whereas:'These disturbed areas which are discovered to demand 3-Dimensions of Space indicate the position of the electron; yet we cannot state that the disturbed area is the electron. Because any such locality has a tendency to spread, and if the matter of the universe were a number of disturbed areas, by now it would have spread indefinitely'.
- J.W.N. Sullivan, The Limitations of Science, pp. 103 & 104

(Hold that non-expansive - standing field of static - thought?)

Exactly what the present day - indefinitely spreading - universe looks like: without the Big Bang. (By now it would have spread indefinitely: squared...)

"Obviously matter is not expanding".

Manifest Natural Precedence For Accelerating Expansion :
Very much on the order of 360 degree arcs of ripples (or pie-plate charted portions thereof) emanating from the center disturbance point on the surface of a pool of water. The newer, earlier ripples not only expanding, but also accelerating. Moving ever more swiftly; with the aging development of distance from center source of disturbance. Not only is qualified continuous expansion, colloquially and precisely found here (on the surface of water), but also acceleration. A ubiquitous, natural emergence of an expanding; accelerating system. Laymen often flatly deny acceleration of expanding water ripples: they are mistaken...
It is traditionally verified in ripple tank studies that the further water-waves move from their geometric origin (center source of disturbance), the faster they expand, etcetera, ad dynamic infinitum. The expanding water ripples are accelerating - moving ever-faster - and the structure of the concentric acceleration is accountable in the law of the inverse square.
The difference between expanding water ripples and expanding electromagnetism is that water ripples are expanding (accelerating) much more slowly than light (electromagnetism) and water ripples require a conducting medium, whereas light does not (Refer Michelson & Morley’s interferometer experiments and Einstein’s conclusion that there is no ‘aether’ <conducting medium previously thought to vehiculiarize light waves>).
Consider the following quotes from Guy Murchie’s (excellent reference book) Music Of The Spheres:

"... the famous Krakatoa (South Pacific island volcanic eruption generated) swells of 1883 were credited with heights well above one hundred feet, combined with length that grew to hundreds of miles and a speed no less than that of sound in air (approx. 720 miles per hour)."
- p. 373, Guy Murchie, Music of the Spheres.

"Another curious characteristic of the (ship or boat) bow wave... is that, taken in the singular, it becomes concave forward, due to acceleration." - Guy Murchie, Ibid, p. 374

"... stern waves (on/of water, as from a ship or boat) accelerate in concave backward form..." - Ibid, p. 375

"... liquid waves possess acceleration..." - Ibid p. 376

another accordance of the General Theory; which states that a thrown baseball or a fired bullet does not actually describe a curved or parabolic path to the earth, when projected horizontally above its surface. Instead, they actually move in straight lines which only appear to be curves and parabolas.

The reason for this says Einstein, is that, 'What is 4-Dimensionally straight gives the illusion of being curved or parabolic when projected on the 3 recognized Dimensions Of Space'.
These quasi 3-D parabolas and curves which are not really parabolas and curves, but instead are 4-D straight lines, are called 'geodesics'.
Einstein's geodesic account of gravity is that, 'Matter causes the 4-D Space-Time continuum to curve in the area surrounding it'. This fact is formally referred to as, 'Einstein's postulate of the 4-D Space-Time metric'.
If we find this Einsteinian description of gravitation vague, it is simply because it is indeed a vague description, yielding small conceptual compromise when compared with the familiar if mysterious 'tug' of Classical Newtonian gravity. One may question, What does Relativity mean when it accounts for gravity by referencing the 4-D Space-Time metric and the curving of the 4-D Space-Time Continuum? And how does this 4-D Space-Time Continuum cause bodies to descend, or geodesically appear to descend?
The 'answer' is that physicists do not understand the identity of Einstein's 4th Dimension; since space-time is one of the many effects of the 4th Dimension, it is not understood or recognized what the geodesic gravitational curvature of space-time is either.

“The General Theory (of Relativity) presented a completely altered view of gravitation. It is viewed as a property of space rather than as a force between bodies. As a result of the presence of matter, space becomes a curve and bodies follow the line of least resistance. These 4-D lines are called ‘geodesics’.” - Isaac Asimov, THE INTELLIGENT PERSON’S GUIDE TO SCIENCE

The false enigma is resolved in the recognition that the entire physical frame of reference is - 4-Dimensionally - ever enlarging, pinning the fans to their bleachers, all the cars to the asphalt in the parking lot, the city accomodating the ball park and the omnidirectionally expanding planet the city rests upon: rising up to create the illusion that the apparently curving baseball trajectory, which is actually a moving in a straight line ('geodesic'), appears to be moving in a parabolic arc. When a test object is projected straight up in the air, it does not 'slow down, turn around and return to the catcher. No indeed. The catcher - or the ground - rises up to overtake and impact the test object.

4-D MASS-FIELD STRAIGHT-LINE GEODESIC <Back to Euclidean geometry>. Fact#9.

Here's what false authority says of Einstein's 4-D geodesic: "We cannot visualize such a curved space. Because humanity is not four dimensional." - The LIFE Science Library's UNIVERSE, p. 179

"Reality is an illusion - albeit, a persistent one."
- Einstein

“The General Theory (of Relativity) presented a completely altered view of gravitation. It is viewed as a property of space rather than as a force between bodies. "As a result of the presence of matter, space becomes a curve and bodies follow the line of least resistance." These 4-D lines are called ‘geodesics’.” - Isaac Asimov, THE INTELLIGENT PERSON’S GUIDE TO SCIENCE

Neither will it ever be visualized, until Matter is recognized to be 4-Dimensionally expanding (growing ever larger, omnidirectionally, from its center). As simply illustrated here and affluently verified throughout this mere historical - previously unrecognized - review.