I thought maybe the Standard Model had the direction of the vector forces going 180 degrees in the opposite direction. Then, we could use Newton's third law to explain why the force particles would bring the particles together: the force particles would be drawing the particles closer together by producing an equal and opposite force. But could the Standard Model be that far off because they claim the experimental evidence conconclusive supports their view that the force particles are being exchanged, not being blasted off in the opposite direction away from each other. I think that I am now starting to see the elegance, beauty, and strength in McCord's masscharge universal law because it allows me to finally understand how the Standard Model description of messenger force particles could produce forces that make sense.

I use the idea of the fractal nature of the universe from the smallest particles to the largest ones that make up the cosmos. Let us consider the electromagnetic force between a proton and an electron in an Hydrogen atom. Let's imagine an electron that is hit by an anitiphoton (negatively charged), absorbs the energy, then hops to a higher energy shell. Eventually, the electron emits a photon to the proton, and the proton emits one to the electon, with a game of catch in hand.

Previously, I would have thought the throwing momentum would drive the proton and electron apart, but McCord's law could explain the situation this way. When electrons try to catch or absorb a photon-antiphoton pair, a disturbance is caused which causes the dominant matter charge to intensify and prevail, which is negative in the cause of an electron. This causes the photon to plunge into the electron with its antiphoton half first followed by its photon half. The more massive and charged electron dominates, hence the photon partners both become absorbed without changing the charge of the photon partners (conservation of charge maintained), thereby increasing the energy of the electron due to the disruption from containing a like-charged particle internally (predicted by McCord's disruption-charge-mass law), which states that as disruption increases, charge increases, which increases the mass of the particle by its increased capacity to acquire further masss. When the electron emits the photon , the half first out of the electron is the negative antiphoton of the pair, then the positive photon one joined on a single vibrating strand of masscharge-energy.

Using the idea of fractal, we see that no matter how tiny we cut up a particle of light, the particle of light will always have the same look and characteristics. With the positive charge of the photon now facing the electron, the electron is pulled by the oppositely charged photon closer to the proton until reaching a lower energy shell, having lost enough energy to be in a lower energy shell. The negatively led charged led photon continues its journey to the heart of the atom, the proton.

Mathematical Proof R. REESE

I ran across very strong support for your theory. In fact, no other equations or theory can account for and explain the phenomena discovered by Dr. Hau's team at Harvard http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2003...s_03176.htmlIf you plug in zero mass for a photon into existing quantum and relativistic equations and zero velocity, you end up with zero energy. Your theory and my equations clearly give a positive value for the potential energy of a photon at rest. As far as I know, we have the only theory with substantiated mathematical equations that can account for this phenomena. I do not know how Dr. Hau and her team are explaining this anomalous finding that clashes with existing theory in physics. I have also discovered that we are not alone with our approach. Tajmar and Matos have a similar one http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0603/0603032.pdf, but when I plug in their given values, the equations yield data inconsistent with existing data, unlike our theory, which is also good news for your theory