Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| | A TOE not Based on Absolute Unification. | | Introduction
Since this particular TOE involves giving specific importance to the phenomenon of separation it may be prudent to describe the suspected actions at the beginning of our universe first and show what place separation may have taken in. Not many people will challenge the idea that everything in our universe is moving outwardly. Data collected over the years have delivered overwhelming evidence for this phenomenon. There is, however, less agreement about the very first seconds of our universe’s existence. Lets make that minutes, hours, or days.
In this TOE a distinction is made between the spot from which our universe started to move outwardly, and the moment on which materialization started to occur. From our spot in space/time it is not possible to distinguish if everything came out of a single spot in our universe or if materialization only started to occur about halfway between that spot and the place we are at right now. No evidence is currently known to us that can help make a distinction either way. Our universe may have come into being days, weeks or years after the initiation of the outward movement we witness today. In effect, the materializing process would then show initially an empty spot at its center.
Our current universe is moving outwardly much faster than at the time of materialization. This theory explains that the initial outward movement was followed by the Big Bang. Again, materialization first, Big Bang second. It was the materialized matter that 'exploded,' the reason being that matter was in conflict right after materialization. Two movements therefore follow each other. Outward movement in which materialization starts to occur, then speeded up outward movement by actions during Big Bang.
What existed before the Big Bang is unknown — we have absolutely no data until materialization started. In this TOE, materialization started in a large outwardly moving area. It could have encompassed an area the size of the earth, or the size of our solar system; a smaller or a larger area. Yet this theory states that materialization did not start in a single spot. The transition of materialization occurred later, and this moment signifies separation. Singularity is therefore not required to create this theory.
Separation seems fundamental. And there is evidence. Evidence of the fundamental nature of separation is delivered in In Search of a Cyclops in chapter 5, where mathematical structures of prime numbers give significance to the number zero. The number zero is required to explain a step in a structure that is otherwise completely inhabited by positive integers. As soon as a person mentions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, the number zero is part and parcel of it as well — whether mentioned by name or concealed completely — simply does not matter. What appears to be most obvious to most of us can now be said to be true. Zero exists when the positive integers exist.
The fundamental nature of separation tells us something about our universe. Our universe came into being thanks to separation — not unification. If our universe was somehow unified it could have ceased to exist already — or it would not even have come into being. Though the source may be one and the same, when the reason our universe came into being is separation then we should only be able to find many links between what has been materialized, but we should not be able to find ultimate unification. You can take a look at the mathematical evidence as described in In Search of a Cyclops at http://www.pentapublishing.com |  Contents | | |
Latest 5 articles | | |
Article Tools | | |
Featured Articles | | | |  | | | | | | | | Current "Big Bang" concept is nonsense.
The term "COSMOS" has come to mean all that exists. The term universe has come to infer a physical existence located in the cosmos. The universe is therefore the result of a collision of at least two fundamental physical entities that have always existed in the cosmos.
Many human minds seem to have difficulty accepting the possibility that something has always existed. This tends to lead to religious concepts for answers.
The "Big Bang" concept is confusing only due to the nonsense of bogus terminology created by abstract mathematical gauge theory theorist.
| | |
By
Chaim
on
07-06-2005, 11:03 AM
| | What means "outward(ly)" ?
You state: "Our current universe is moving outwardly", and seem to take this as given, without question or further explanation.
To be a little more precise, the "large(r)-scale", say, extra-galactic remainder of our observable universe (ou) appears, at least from our current vantage point, to be moving away/"outward" from our instruments; thus intergalactic space appears to be relatively and isotropically, "expanding".
But, "expanding" with respect to what?
What is the observable universe supposed to be moving away or "outward" from? From itself?
And, if so, what background ({4+}-dimensional?) "meta-space" is it expanding "into"? And why only on a large(r)-scale?
I'm not sure if the ideas/notions of "outward" and expansion have been well-formed yet.
If we don't state very clearly what our observations do and do not tell us, the our theorizing is likely to go awry.
Perhaps we could have a subsection of this site allocated for TOOU's
(theories of the observable universe) or TOU's for short? | | | | |  Based on focussed consciousness.
In the very first micro-second of the birth of this cosmos,or universe,a process
that I would call focussed consciousness,was wrought into being,an awesome
intention of mind,brought about a expansion and a bringing of energy,from the
unknowable nomunen,to the partially knowable phenomenen,which we investigate today.
This great thought that has brought about that has brought us to see this
universe around us,is still in process,and will not cease till we once again
enter into obscuration,and return to the unmanifested nomunen from whence
we came.It seems that the more we begin to understand realality and life
in general,it all seems finally to be a product of thought.
thoughts are indeed things?
kindest regards,michael. | | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Article: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Article Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new articles You may not post comments You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com | |
