| Re: Singularity As Separate Entity Hello Moshen,
I too read with interest the first part of your article.
Could singularity as you have used it mean unicity?
Does entity necessarily mean embodied?
Is be-ing ony relative to manifested phenomenon objects or can be-ing apply as the subject of all objects, as the uncaused cause, or the first without a second?
Is the Oneness anything more than a non-tangible Principle?
Do these things apply to the metaphysical realm of thought as precepts by/of which concepts are constructed?
Ideation begets thoughts [personality/karma], begets words, beget deeds, begets habits, begets character [destiny].
I will read more of your article,
thank you. |