Singularity As Separate Entity

[Drifter]

Hello Moshen,

I too read with interest the first part of your article.

Could singularity as you have used it mean unicity?

Does entity necessarily mean embodied?

Is be-ing ony relative to manifested phenomenon objects or can be-ing apply as the subject of all objects, as the uncaused cause, or the first without a second?

Is the Oneness anything more than a non-tangible Principle?

Do these things apply to the metaphysical realm of thought as precepts by/of which concepts are constructed?

Ideation begets thoughts [personality/karma], begets words, beget deeds, begets habits, begets character [destiny].

I will read more of your article,
thank you.

[Drifter]

Could it be possible that the answer, which was created by the mind, cannot be found in the mind?

The answer though might be experienceable might it not?

If only the experiencing of what our true-essence is [as that creative force] can lead to the epiphany of the mind, it would stand to reason that as subjectivity we loose our objectivity sine we can't Be in two places at the same time. As in deep sleep the sleeper is not the dream but the 'Onedreaming' is neither and both, non-duality, singularly, as The Principle of Oneness.

Last night I was a man dreaming He was a butterfly.
Today am I a butterfly dreaming It is a man? -Lao Tzu

[Omnio]

Science will never find out how the universe was created. Electromagnetism will always be a mystery to science, but it does not have to be a mystery to you.

Truth is here: www.christsway.co.za

I hope you're all enlightened.