The Therory of Everything as the Paradigm of Science

[paradigm]

The essay, "The Logic of the Universe (Debunking Physics and Discovering the Theory of Everything as the Paradigm of Science)", is located at: http://members.westnet.com.au/paradigm/forever.pdf

[labelwench]

Thank you for Posting your theory, Paradigm.

Your work is my 'to do' project of the day, and luck is with you. An early snowfall has made the outdoors less of a distraction, and provided incentive for a warm beverage and a 'good read'.

So, what have you got for me....hmmmmm.......

Oh, yes. Though I am not the official greeter, (not sure who is), I bid you welcome to the many threads and forums of T.O.E. Quest, and look forward to your postings.

Regards,

Labelwench

[labelwench]

Okay, I've only just made it this far. Short break for it to marinate and then I return, commitment made.

Your style is easy to understand. Suddenly much of what the others have been discussing in the comfort of the jargon of their understanding, is coming into focus. For this, I thank you.

Given that the big appeal of religion is the offer of infinite existence, the fact that infinite existence is a given fact of existence will be the last nail in the coffin of religion.

The Universe involves irony. We can know that out there in the Universe there are an infinite number of our individual and collective selves. However, due to the increasing rate of atomic decay as a spacecraft moves away from our solar system, it’s not possible to visit our other individual and collective selves.

The practitioners of the abstractionist paradigm have an unquestioning belief in the analogies called mathematics and measurements as being necessary for understanding the Universe. What they fail to understand is that logical thinking can go beyond the limitations of mathematics and measurements.

Billions of dollars of public money is being wasted on physics projects that have no scientific merit. There are thirteen gravity wave detectors in operation, and 3 under construction. All of which are pointless.

In his “A Brief History of Time”, Stephen Hawking states that philosophy has “...not been able to keep up with the advance of scientific theories.” As logical and materialist philosophy, this essay demonstrates that Stephen Hawking is wrong. A philosophy that begins with fundamental observation, accepts all scientific evidence, and maintains logical consistency, is also science. Science can be encapsulated as the act of discovery and the art of explanation. All explanation involves the use of analogies, whether they’re words or numbers.

“To draw a distinction between the scientific and philosophical fields is obscurantism.” (Karl Pearson, “The Grammar of Science”, 1937)

[austintorn@aol.com]

Everyone should read the pdf, as it is one of the most sensible TOEs to come along in quite a while.

Sometimes we have to slow down in life, to read something long, in peace, at the right time, as I have to, also, reread the pdf.

Emissions happen everywhere, all the time, and, indeed, many now see gravity as a secondary effect of the more fundamental happenings.

(To the author: there was some talk of the global warming part in the 'Idea' thread and some 'emission' the RLT Resting Light Theory thread.)

[SteveA]

Great work there, Paradigm. I have read through some of it and I agree very much with many of your comments and insights and it appears a very fresh perspective.

I also saw a couple of the poems you posted and can relate with the sentiments :)

Thank you for posting your ideas.