Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    Orange Belt
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    23
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Simply, Everything

    “Simply, Everything”

    by
    Steven Cohen

    Introduction

    From the time any highly-evolved organism develops the “ability to reason” he, she, (or it) attempts to understand the Universe within which it manifest.

    A majority of these organisms throughout their lives absorb just enough “information” to survive, while others search further for still more in order to thrive. The remaining small minority (often designated as “the scientists”) spend their mental existence contemplating compulsive quests in attempting to (metaphorically) “scale the ‘Everest’ of all knowledge”.

    The “Intellectual Mountain” however, throughout time beginning with the dawn of civilization, has always appeared to get taller and taller as each group of scientists (climbers), think they had reached the “peak” only to discover “just a plateau” with which their new theories only partially explain “more of ‘something‘” but not “everything”!

    Originally it was thought that Aristotle had figured “everything” out, but then almost two-thousand years later Sir Isaac Newton established a new “base-camp” higher up upon Mankind’s Intellectual Everest at (metaphorically), say, 21,000 feet.

    The “mountain” resisted for almost three-hundred more years until finally Einstein (metaphorically) reached the 26,000 foot level with both Special and General Relativity.

    His “mind” assumed he had reached the top-of-the-mountain until other “minds”, contemplating the “microscopic” in contrast to Einstein’s contemplation of the “macroscopic”, discovered newer and more unexplained and un-reconcilable complexities upon Mankind’s seemingly-unreachable intellectual apex.

    The “apples and oranges” of merging both Relativity and Quantum Physics which would (in assumptions of theory) propel Mankind’s first intellectual conqueror to the 29,000+ foot apex, rests upon an unthinkable scientific assumption that either Einstein, the Quantum physicists, (or unthinkably) BOTH had in fact somehow erred.

    Could all of the “Great Minds” in the span of all of Human history have failed to recognize the undisputable fact that “all knowledge of ‘Everything’” has been filtered through Evolution’s gift to Mankind; the Human Mind? Also significant, could our minds while executing any “act-of-contemplation” by Nature’s design “unconsciously” thwart all attempts at “Universal Understanding”, via the repetitive differential calculus of “thinking” itself?

    “Simply, Everything!”, is “everything” explained as “simply” as possible.

    If the reader does not agree then all he, she (or it) has demonstrated is one or more of the “Five Flaws of the Human Mind”!

    At the 29,000+ foot apex

    Behold (simply), the Equation of a “Post-Einsteinian” Universe, new and more authentic Laws of (objective) Observation, and finally the undeniable common element cementing the merger of both Relativity and Quantum Physics.

    Witness (simply), Einstein’s (as well as most scientists’) mistake and rub your eyes over and over again and still actually see all Four Forces of Nature under the long-sought-after “common denominator”.

    Learn (simply), the Five Flaws of the Human Mind as well as the true wave-function (or equation) of a human being.

    Simply answered and straight-to-the-point are major questions about “What is Life?” and “What is the Mind?”, and detailed without ever leaving the Laws of Physics!.

    The finally answered question concerning every organism’s observation of “The Phenomenon” should enlighten the “spiritual” to the “scientific” and vice versa to the true nature of manifestation of “everything” as well as comprehension itself of the Universe as a whole.

    Rationally, six possible Nobel Prizes have been squeezed into just nine typed pages. Can any explanation of “everything” (Modern Science cares to know about) exist simpler than that?!

    Section #1

    Derive the Equation of the “Post-Einsteinian” Universe.

    Cohen’s Three Laws of Observation.

    Merger of Relativity and Quantum Physics.

    Section #2

    Einstein’s “Mistake“.

    The Four Forces of Nature

    under a Common Denominator.

    Section #3

    The Five “Flaws” of the Human Mind.

    Section #4

    The Wave-Function (Equation) of a Human Being.

    Section #5

    What is Life?

    Section #6

    What is the Mind?

    Section #7

    What is “The Phenomenon” That We Humans Refer to as (quote) “GOD” (unquote)?

    [BREAK]

    Simply, “Everything”!

    E = mc^2
    Equation of the Einsteinian Universe

    dividing both sides by E,

    (E / E )= (mc^2 / E) = 1 is valid

    Dividing both sides by mc^2,

    (mc^2
    / mc^2) = (E / mc^2) = 1
    is also valid


    Thus,


    (1 + 1 ) = (mc^2 / E) + (E / mc^2) = 2


    Is the Equation of a Post-Einsteinian Universe.

    Cohen’s Laws of Observation (of a Post-Einsteinian Universe)

    FIRST LAW:
    The number ONE (1) DOES NOT EXIST in Nature, but defines the property of “invariance” and represents an approaching but unreachable limit. The number ONE (1) manifests virtually as an Observer’s “frame-of-reference” as an infinitely-definable, subjective ruler.

    SECOND LAW: All the fundamental entities of the Universe (matter, energy, force, number, etc.) exist naturally in pairs. (The dichotomy of “force” was first discovered by Sir Isaac Newton in 1687.)

    THIRD LAW: The Universe can only be described in a “simplest form” as consisting of a pair of properties; “invariance” and “equivalence”, (which upon observation manifests “uncertainty”). Thus, the fundamental axiom of observation:

    “ANYTHING DESCRIBABLE CAN BE DESCRIBED IN AN INFINITE AMOUNT OF WAYS.”

    The Third Law most closely states the “fundamental property” of observation from within a Post-Einsteinian Universe and holds throughout its entirety. From the deepest deep-sky Hubble Telescope observations “down” through the smallest entity conceived by “an observer” (the Planck length), the Third Law holds.

    The entire Post-Einsteinian Universe is “Relativistic” (definition: “is a consequence of ‘invariance’”) and Nature guarantees adherence to the Third Law by outlawing subjectively-precise, numerical determination at all levels. From the macroscopic to the microscopic and from the “minute inaccuracies inserted into the equations of classical Physics” to the “the natural uncertainties of Quantum wave-functions”, “anything describable can be described in an infinite amount of ways”!

    Thus in a Post-Einsteinian Universe, both Relativity and Quantum Physics are merged.

    The Third Law holds in reference to the “Constants” of Nature as each and every one represents a “limit”, and can be expressed dichotomously as either an irrational number with an “infinite” amount of decimal places, or either as a convergent or divergent infinite series.

    All “numbers”, which subjectively represent “quantities of variables”, naturally exist in the dichotomous form of pairs, (Second Law), and furthermore dichotomously (conforming to the Third Law) as either in “fractional” form (nominator over denominator), or in “logarithmic” form (base raised to exponential power).

    It is “the mind of the Observer” (First Law) which manipulates the “dichotomy of number” into the virtual simplification of all numbers existing over either a denominator of “One” (1), or under an exponent of “One” (1).

    “Equivalence” manifests as subjective observations of the relationships of Nature, which are subjectively assigned one of the infinite ruler-values (First Law) for relative measurement, naturally exist in number-pairs that subjectively reduce to the same number, (EX: 2 = 2/1 = 4/2 = 8/4, etc. or 81 = 81^1 = 3^3 = 9^2, etc.), and this property permeates infinitely (Third Law). Thus, “differentiation” manifests as “undefined” and “equivalence“ manifests subjectively as “uncertainty“.

    [BREAK]

    The Four “Forces” of Nature

    (Under a Common Denominator)

    Michelson and Morely discovered “invariance” in Nature in 1887 and Einstein explained its consequences upon an Observer’s “frame-of-reference” in 1905.
    The Post-Einsteinian Universe is similar to Einstein’s in that it is comprised of both Matter ( E / mc^2 ) and Energy ( mc^2 / E ), and when observed as a consequence of the (discovered) invariance of the speed-of-light ( c ), both reduce to the subsequent effects described in both General and Special Relativity, respectively.

    (Einstein’s greatest mistake was not his “Cosmological Constant”, but his failure to recognize the non-existence of the “Number One” outside of his own mind.)

    The equation of a Post-Einsteinian Universe is an “invariant equation”:

    (mc^2 / E) + (E / mc^2) = 2

    Energy + Matter = 2

    with all “forces” of Nature manifesting as a consequence of invariance.

    Force 1

    The manifestation of what can be described as (or what we commonly refer to as) the “Electromagnetic Force” is the relativistic consequence of the fact that mass over a denominator (or base) of energy cannot exist as the invariance of the square of the speed of light in the numerator causes a “divergence”, with “speed” measured as the derivative of C^2 (which is C).
    Observers and their instruments (in the conventional sense) consist of “matter”. In the Post-Einsteinian Universe “( 1 + 1 =) Energy + Matter = 2”, thus when observing “Energy” (in the electromagnetic component of the Universe), any measurement of its “speed of propagation” will always reduce to the limit of One (1) or “c”, the speed of light, which defines “invariance”. Subsequent effects to the observer further reduce to the explanations of Special Relativity.

    Also, matter over a base of energy cannot exist except during very brief, almost virtual intervals before recombining and (re-)propagating as Energy. This is what we know as “anti-matter”, and explains why there is no anti-matter in the Post-Einsteinian or in a conventionally Einsteinian or Newtonian Universe.

    Force 2

    Conversely, what can be described as the “Force of Gravitation” is the relativistic consequence of the invariance of the square of the speed of light in the denominator causing a “convergence”, (inwards towards itself), as mass (m) increases. Explanations of subsequent effects further reduce to General Relativity.

    Since no Matter can exist without a component of Energy, the concept of “Absolute Zero” cannot exist except as a subjective “limit”, and this cannot be reached.

    Force 3

    Mass ( m ), in the denominator of the Matter ( E / mc^2 ) component of the Universe, cannot be reduced so as to create a denominator of “zero”. In Mathematics, division “BY” zero is undefined and since “division by zero” ( 0 ) also cannot exist in Nature, when mass ( m ) becomes too small, Nature corrects this by “strongly forcing” matter (or “particles”) to combine to maintain the “invariance“ of the relationships and the “stability“ of matter; this is (what we know as) the “STRONG force”.

    Force 4

    Also, division “INTO” zero ( 0 ) cannot exist in Nature in the numerator of the Matter component ( E / mc^2 ), so that when the “Energy numerator” becomes too small, Energy (it has been commonly observed) in the form of an electron (beta particle) is expelled from the “matter base” ( the “mc^2” denominator ) to maintain the “invariance” of the overall relationship. Due to the similarity of the polarity of the energy expelled (an electron) to the polarity of the Electromagnetic Force, this resultant “weak-repulsion force” can be considered a “cousin” and is (commonly referred to as) the “Electroweak Force”.

    The Five (5) “Flaws” of the Human Mind

    1. Evolved Sensory Exclusion

    Consequences of Observation:

    2. Exponential Mind-Drag
    3. Chronological Assumption

    Consequences of Analysis:

    4. Egotistical Arrogance
    5. Intellectual Overshoot

    1. Evolved Sensory Exclusion: Nature did not furnish the Mind of a Human Being with all the sensatory apparatus needed to perceive everything in the Universe. Sight, sound, touch, smell, taste, (and intuition; sense of the “virtual“) are all limited by evolution.

    Thus, the Mind compensates both “virtually“ and “subjectively“.

    2. Exponential Mind-Drag: Since the “Third Law of Observation” always holds, irrespective of whether the Mind is cognizant of this fact, “details” manifest and forever increase as a function of time; the longer the Mind observes, the more it sees. This can go on perpetually (or for the life of the observer) and at some point it (the Mind) subjectively stops obtaining information. Subsequently “Informational Overload” occurs, leading to confusion as the Mind is “dragged by the line-of-time”.

    3. Chronological Assumption: When the Mind fails to realize that what it doesn’t know is not a consequence of not being observed (discovered), but rather of the Mind itself not reconciling the information it has. The History of Science “assumes” that discoveries manifest in chronological order.

    4. Egotistical Arrogance: Is the failure of the Mind to recognize that the number “One” (1) DOES NOT EXIST in Nature outside of itself.

    5. Intellectual Overshoot: Is the Mind’s (Newtonian) reaction to Egotistical Arrogance in the self-manifestation of long-worded assumptions and descriptions of simple facts; simply, subjective Mind-Drag in the opposite direction. Quantum Physics is an “Intellectual Overshoot” of Relativity as a consequence of “Egotistical Arrogance”.

    These five “flaws” are a natural occurrence as a consequence of Physics. In order for the “Mind” to successfully “execute the operation of contemplation”, it must exhibit one or a combination of these five flaws. Man’s (Nature’s) own Egotistical Arrogance has kept these “flaws” unrecognized until this time.

    The totality of all of Humanity’s (matter contemplating itself‘s) understanding has been filtered through a (Human) Mind. Any Mind that cannot envision that Evolution has denied it “simple understanding”, will have trouble easily comprehending that this simple 6-page “Theory of Everything” is as close as Science (and in the Mind, Religion) can ever get to that “Everest” of Universal Understanding so long sought after.

    [BREAK]

    What the Mind cannot “differentiate” it cannot “see”. The existence of “equivalence” in this Universe “sees” to that. Any doubts can simply be attributed to one of or a combinations of the Five Flaws of the Human Mind.

    The Wave-Function (Equation) of a Human Being

    Human Being = Warm-blooded (Tyrannosaurus / Brain)

    “Warn-Blooded” is the invariant constant.

    “Tyrannosaurus” is a metaphor for “the most tenacious predator” to have ever inhabited this Earth.

    “Brain” is simply the (evolved) inhibitor of the Tyrannosaurus born into all of us.

    When “Brain” (value) increases, our Tyrannosaurus decreases and when “Brain” decreases, the more “animalistic” we become.

    Every Human Being possesses a “Tyrannosaurus/Brain Instinct Ratio” and problems potentially arise in proximity of organisms of contrasting ratios.

    Paradox: a Human Being possessing (a subjectively defined) “one” brain still reduces to a “warm-blooded Tyrannosaurus!”

    What is Life?

    Answer: Life is a Newtonian (action-reaction) consequence of matter (or of one particular molecule), resisting gravity as best it could and developing the ability to SUCCESSFULLY move through space-time.

    Gravity “attracts” matter, (more accurately described by General Relativity).

    Matter with its Gravity creates Geometry. Larger gravitational objects are spherical, smaller are irregular.

    The “force” of Gravitation is countered (Newton’s Third Law), and in the Gravitational Field this force is reactively transformed, mostly into the vibrational energy (heat) of the matter as the Gravity compresses it. “Gravity releases the Rest-Energy of Matter.” (Nigel Calder)

    Under gravitation, a molecule’s time is limited before it’s destroyed upon compaction.

    By chance, within an environment of unique conditions (liquid water, assisted by gravity-reducing buoyancy) over a long period of time, some matter (molecules) develops a “structure” to absorb and counter the energy released by Gravitational compression; a “spring“ or “helix“.

    “Freedom” (so to speak) of the molecule from the primarily-destructive physical forces of Nature (Gravity) allows the molecule now via “shape” and “chemistry” to alter and create its own environment.

    Life evolves within its own “Universe“.

    Since “one” helix cannot stably exist in Nature (Cohen‘s First and Second Laws), a “double-helix” is more stable.

    By developing the ability to replicate itself, the molecule (DNA) via a newer, duplicate, but not always exact (i.e. evolution) copy develops the (virtual) ability to move through Space-Time, but only within its own Universe.

    [BREAK]

    What is the Mind?

    On Earth, the natural “force of life” is reactive (to mostly gravity), and evolution over eons of time has “experimented” with configurations to defy gravity as best it can.

    The more symmetry an object possesses, the more it is affected by gravity.

    A tree defies gravity by branching, but has limitations.

    Branching reduces the effect of gravity.

    A vine exhibits virtual freedom from gravity with almost no limitations, except from the ability to escape the gravitational field itself.

    What if in a gravitational field, matter could (either by chance or design of Physics), develop a state (or configuration) by which it could both branch and grow massive enough to itself exhibit a force of gravitation of its own?

    Branching with mass? Does this form of matter exist? YES! Gray-matter!

    “Only gravity can release the rest-energy of matter.” (Nigel Calder)

    Mind and gravity are equivalent; the same phenomenon.

    Free-will is a consequence of “Intellectual Gravity“. (Steven Cohen)

    The very tiny manifestation of “intellectual-gravity” within the “brain” is amplified by the electricity and other functions of the (highly-evolved) organism, and with elasticity of its composition, allows it mobility within its environment.

    Intelligence is a consequence of gravity and time.

    What is the Phenomenon That We Humans Refer to as (Quote) “GOD” (Unquote)?

    An organism that has “accumulated time” over a very long period (eons) and has developed a “brain” (a gray-mattered branching mass) large enough to substantiate its own “intellectual gravity”, will possess a “virtual” mind that sinks or is drawn inward.

    The “sinking of the mind” under intellectual-gravity creates an equal and opposite Newtonian reaction; upwards towards “infinity”.

    Since the limit of gravitation is “one”, the limit of gravitational reaction is also equal to “ONE”.

    In order for a mind to “orient itself in space (and time), Nature mandates three dimensions of space and one of time.

    Thus, for the mind to orient itself going through life from (1) “here” to (2) “there”, it (the mind) naturally but subjectively manufactures (3) “an invariance” (a third dimension), so as to ascertain its “position” relative to time and relative to its subjective, possibly pre-determined, “chosen path”.

    (Metaphor: An interplanetary spacecraft going from Earth to, say, Jupiter needs to orient one of its sensors on “an invariance” (usually the star, Canopus) to know exactly where it is on its journey at a particular time to assist in its navigation.)

    This “invariance” reactively manifesting due to the “sinking of the mind”, (a “gray-mattered branching mass” large enough to subjectively-contract the Mind under its own “intellectual-gravity”), can within the phenomena of Physics be described as the phenomenon that we Humans refer to as (quote) “God” (unquote)!

    Since Cohen’s Third Law is universal, and “anything describable can be described in an infinite amount of ways”, all religions are a consequence of this same phenomenon. (“Atheism” is also this same phenomenon meaning just “none of what you guys think!”)


    Steven Cohen
    compiled in March 2005
    Last edited by Robert; 03-26-2006 at 02:13 PM. Reason: improved formatting some

  2. #2
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63

    Being the nicest ever possible...

    This approach is the, what we can now call, clasical fatal-error typer of theory of everything (CFET-TOE). It has the appearance very well worked out, but is nothing inside. It looks, when read, that it shows and explains everything, or atleast a lot of the universe and humans and concepts. This is because it's so simple and "logical". But please, for anyone who reads this theory, don't get your heads filled with such a wrong theory, and don't waste your time.
    Last edited by Guille; 08-26-2005 at 08:24 PM.

  3. #3
    Orange Belt
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    23
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Guille,

    I'll excuse your naivety due to your age (July 1, 1990) and the unrestrained impulsivensss of a Moonchild.

    Thank you however, for vividly demonstrating to others how "mind flaws" (egotistical arrogance and intellectual overshoot) subjectively affect perceptions. This is all natural part of the universe.

    All kids think they know everything but you can apologize to me in 40 years when you get to my age.

    I stand by my work.

    Don't let your mind be dragged by the line-of-time.

    Scoop

  4. #4
    Green Belt
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    87
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    25
    as i just flew over this article (nothing pushed me to read even one single line in complete)

    so ... i rather i agree somehow with guille...

    kids now will know by your age that kids then will know whats then (can you express that like that? doesn't matter....)

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    No logical implications can be raised to the status of law unless it has been well tested through space and time. So, Mr. Cohen, your laws of observations can only be your own personal hypotheses. I mean, you certainly have the right to call them anything you want. Nevertheless, they are intellectually insulting to other people for them to agree with you that they are indomitable laws for everybody.

  6. #6
    Orange Belt
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    23
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Perhaps I can help you (everyone) rationalize?

    We are all born "to think" a certain way, and our teachers simply teach us that way inserting facts for us to absorb along the way; absorbtion devoid of Philosophy. Our minds naturally delve INTO whatever we're observing, breaking DOWN into smaller and smaller parts. Differentiation as opposed to Integration.

    Einstein thought differently. When he realized that the paradigms he was taught did not fit observation, he "thought-outside-the-box" and contemplated newer paradigms. Metaphoricaly, he did not continually try to put square pegs into round holes.

    I guess you have to develop your mind (and your intuitive confidence) to realize that someone who came before you had "taken the wrong road".

    According to conventional thinking, it would appear that a TOE can be deduced by breaking the Universe into all its smallest parts. However to comprehensively explain "Everything", your theory would be as large as the Universe itself. This leads to a dead-end. "Time" or "spacetime" inadvertently is removed from all these incomplete theories. Trust me, the TOE would have been found already.

    Now do some Einsteinian thinking and imagine "smallness" along with "time" expanding into "everything", compressing 14 billion? years of time in your mind instead of eliminating it?

    I stand by "Simply, Everything" and is correct today as it will be 10,000 years from now. My "job" is not to criticize but make you see it.

    (Read passed the first Nobel Prize and examine the others. Nobody's commented on them.)

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    I know there are many people out there who are trying to explain everything. Speaking for myself, I am trying to make the fusion engine works. If anyone can convince me why this fusion engine will never work then and only then will I stop my research efforts.

  8. #8
    Orange Belt
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    23
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Nuclear Fusion in theory, conceived by the mind, can be deduced to manifest in Nature.

    However, Nature DICTATES that Fusion reactions can only manifest under conditions that Nature alone has the power to DICTATE.

    Fusion happens within the interior of stars under massive temperatures and massive pressures. On (the cold) planet Earth, we have only been able to SIMULATE stellar conditions for only minute fractions of time before those elusive conditions evaporate.

    We cannot (currently) achieve sustainable fusion not due to Science, but rather technology or engineering. Somehow we've been taught not to separate the two from Science.
    If you want fusion to work (in our lifetimes) just perpetually simulate the stellar interior.

    Always remember, "Mother Nature calls all the shots!"

  9. #9
    Green Belt
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    87
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    25
    keep on research - sometime - someone - will suceed - if not you then someone else - and all that is just fine ....

    and i rather go with mother nature slowly but surely (at least on a global basis at the beginning) has to adapt even further to humans (sure they are also kind naturals)

  10. #10
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    However, Nature DICTATES that Fusion reactions can only manifest under conditions that Nature alone has the power to DICTATE.
    You are not telling me anything that I already know. FYI: physical conditions of the sun have been surpassed in the lab.

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Does the Goddess mean Good?
    By harmonygirl in forum Intelligent Design
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 01-13-2007, 04:13 AM
  2. Etheric body (vital body)
    By mkirkpatrick in forum Intelligent Design
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-05-2006, 08:32 PM
  3. darkness is just the absence of light.
    By mkirkpatrick in forum Philosophy Questions
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 03-01-2006, 12:49 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top