I agree but who can we ask for such deficit? How could we save or spend the money that we don't have to begin with?Originally Posted by dleviwing
I agree but who can we ask for such deficit? How could we save or spend the money that we don't have to begin with?Originally Posted by dleviwing
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
The truth of everything is less than one inch,it is only equal and the lion is one.One is free when the door is opened,education has the key.=
Hope to be forgiven since I was such in a rush in my calculations in order to stay within the time limit of this computer at the public library.Originally Posted by MJA
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Thanks. You need my address? For delivering that paper thin flat screen supercomputer that is.Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
As long as it is not one with an invisible keyboard?Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
I have a problem with a big bang (which is finite in concept) which produces infinite mass. I am more comfortable with the infinite potential of nothing (infinite density = infinite potential) and a Universe which continues to create at its periphery yielding forth this infinite potential for perpetuity. This is my model of creation and I will stand by it. It explains everything.
"There is nothing permanent except change"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)