+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6
Results 51 to 54 of 54

Thread: missing mass

  1. #51
    Grandmaster Lloyd Gillespie is a name known to all Lloyd Gillespie is a name known to all Lloyd Gillespie is a name known to all Lloyd Gillespie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    4,438
    Blog Entries
    62
    Thanks Given
    2,616
    Thanked 2,126x in 1,347 Posts
    Rep Power
    67

    Re: missing mass

    Antonio, check out this web site: http://www.rexresearch.com/nucell/nucell.htm It's about possible strontium batteries. I don't think the ideas work, yet, but the theorizing is interesting, about converting strontium radiations, directly into electricity. I think it's worth the read, just for the extra-ideas of theory...

    May have something to do with our quests for cold/hot fusion, etc....

    Oh, and BTW, in my searchs, I've come across information of black-hole theory, that electrons are stripped from protons/neutrons, inside black-holes, thus allowing high mass compaction, and possible fusion...? Let me know your ideas about mass/fusion in black-holes, if you would...?

    Lloyd
    "To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel
    "Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein
    "The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G.
    "The tick-tick-tick of the caesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G.

  2. #52
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    8,575
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks Given
    627
    Thanked 811x in 657 Posts
    Rep Power
    119

    Re: missing mass

    Quote Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie
    I think it's worth the read, just for the extra-ideas of theory
    Thanks for all these valuable information. But I'm still trying to understand why magnetism is inversely related to temperature while electricity is directly related to temperature.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  3. #53
    Green Belt ThirdWorld is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    74
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 6x in 6 Posts
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: missing mass

    The "r" is not a constant. As a position vector its scalar product with absolute acceleration is a constant square of light speed.
    *** I don't follow this. Do you care to explain? Are you saying that r x g = c^2?

    The acceleration due to gravity has nothing to do with the speed of light in my view but if you think it does you are free to produce your argument or evidence to support this your point of view.


    So if r approaches infinity then the absolute acceleration approaches zero.
    *** And infinity x 0 is?

    Recall you said when g = 0, M = 0 implying that infinity x 0 = 0 which is incorrect in my view.


    From Galileo's experiments it was proven that the local acceleration of gravity small g does not depend on the inertial mass m. It depends on the big mass M. more later.
    *** Agreed, I also hold that M determines g.

    Roger
    Last edited by dleviwing; 12-18-2007 at 03:17 PM. Reason: fix quote tags

  4. #54
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    8,575
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks Given
    627
    Thanked 811x in 657 Posts
    Rep Power
    119

    Re: missing mass

    Quote Originally Posted by ThirdWorld
    I don't follow this
    This is not the same as Newton's 2nd law of motion. The acceleration is not inertial but absolute which applies only if unit mass mass is defined. Unit mass is the same as a quantum of mass. I was hoping that quantum of mass can help remove the concept of zero mass for photon, graviton, as well as for gluon.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts