It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > Cosmology > Universe Expansion
Reload this Page perfect fusion reaction
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
perfect fusion reaction
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 104x in 103 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
perfect fusion reaction - 11-06-2007, 01:28 PM

The perfect thermonuclear fusion reaction is the nucleosynthesis of two deuterium atoms directly into a single helium atom plus excess energy: D+D®He+energy. This never occurs in the early universe due to the rare abundance of deuterium atoms and their sensitivity to local density and temperature fluctuations. Since the hadrons era of the big bang, protons and neutrons can directly, by still unknown processes, synthesize into hydrogen and helium atoms with abundance ratio 3 to 1 without first producing deuterium atoms, whose abundance ratio to hydrogen is 1 to 30 thousands. In the labs here on earth, this reaction is known as the perfect cold fusion reaction, it is perfect because there is no radioactive by-products, a perfectly clean and almost waste free, and 100% efficiency reaction.

The big question is why nature prefers quick and random wastefulness and inefficiency when it is concerned with energy production? On the other hand, once these energies are produced nature always distributes them equally and accordingly at thermodynamic equilibrium of blackbody radiation which is a minimum process for energy rationing and conservation, a sign of cosmic frugality.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: perfect fusion reaction
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 90
   
Smile Re: perfect fusion reaction - 11-06-2007, 02:41 PM

Cold fusion is what we are about!We have the ingredients,we need to solve the mixing
procedure.



regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: perfect fusion reaction
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 104x in 103 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
Re: perfect fusion reaction - 11-06-2007, 03:41 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
we need to solve the mixing procedure.
We like it but nature certainly rejected this mixing procedure. Why?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: perfect fusion reaction
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 90
   
Smile Re: perfect fusion reaction - 11-06-2007, 04:10 PM

[quote=AntonioLao;38462]We like it but nature certainly rejected this mixing procedure. Why?[/quote.


Don't know that one.prehaps our understanding of it is incorrect.



regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: perfect fusion reaction
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 104x in 103 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
Re: perfect fusion reaction - 11-07-2007, 11:53 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
prehaps our understanding of it is incorrect
It is more of a no understanding since no one has a plausible explanation why there are very few deuterium atoms to begin with.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: perfect fusion reaction
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
Master
sillysally will become famous soon enoughsillysally will become famous soon enoughsillysally will become famous soon enoughsillysally will become famous soon enough
 
sillysally's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 672
Thanks Given: 31
Thanked 48x in 45 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rep Power: 13
   
Re: perfect fusion reaction - 11-07-2007, 12:53 PM

Are you trying to make a bomb?


sally.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: perfect fusion reaction
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 104x in 103 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
Re: perfect fusion reaction - 11-07-2007, 01:02 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by sillysally
Are you trying to make a bomb
More of a theoretical bombshell.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: perfect fusion reaction
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
Master
sillysally will become famous soon enoughsillysally will become famous soon enoughsillysally will become famous soon enoughsillysally will become famous soon enough
 
sillysally's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 672
Thanks Given: 31
Thanked 48x in 45 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rep Power: 13
   
Re: perfect fusion reaction - 11-07-2007, 01:48 PM

The sun is a real bomb.


sally.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: perfect fusion reaction
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 104x in 103 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
Re: perfect fusion reaction - 11-07-2007, 01:55 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by sillysally
The sun is a real bomb.
Not until it become a nova or a supernova and I only hope it's not tomorrow, or the next day, or the next day, or ...


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: perfect fusion reaction
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 90
   
Smile Re: perfect fusion reaction - 11-07-2007, 02:12 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
It is more of a no understanding since no one has a plausible explanation why there are very few deuterium atoms to begin with.
I would consider the reason there is so few is that there is no need of more?Were it
otherwise,then the law of corrospondences would have supplied it!




regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump