LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksThe perfect thermonuclear fusion reaction is the nucleosynthesis of two deuterium atoms directly into a single helium atom plus excess energy: D+D®He+energy. This never occurs in the early universe due to the rare abundance of deuterium atoms and their sensitivity to local density and temperature fluctuations. Since the hadrons era of the big bang, protons and neutrons can directly, by still unknown processes, synthesize into hydrogen and helium atoms with abundance ratio 3 to 1 without first producing deuterium atoms, whose abundance ratio to hydrogen is 1 to 30 thousands. In the labs here on earth, this reaction is known as the perfect cold fusion reaction, it is perfect because there is no radioactive by-products, a perfectly clean and almost waste free, and 100% efficiency reaction.
The big question is why nature prefers quick and random wastefulness and inefficiency when it is concerned with energy production? On the other hand, once these energies are produced nature always distributes them equally and accordingly at thermodynamic equilibrium of blackbody radiation which is a minimum process for energy rationing and conservation, a sign of cosmic frugality.
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 20
Thread: perfect fusion reaction
- 11-06-2007 02:28 PM #1Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,265
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
perfect fusion reaction
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 11-06-2007 03:41 PM #2Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
Re: perfect fusion reaction Cold fusion is what we are about!We have the ingredients,we need to solve the mixing
procedure.
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 11-06-2007 04:41 PM #3Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,265
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
Re: perfect fusion reaction
We like it but nature certainly rejected this mixing procedure. Why?
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 11-06-2007 05:10 PM #4Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
Re: perfect fusion reaction [quote=AntonioLao;38462]We like it but nature certainly rejected this mixing procedure. Why?[/quote.
Don't know that one.prehaps our understanding of it is incorrect.
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 11-07-2007 12:53 PM #5Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,265
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
Re: perfect fusion reaction
It is more of a no understanding since no one has a plausible explanation why there are very few deuterium atoms to begin with. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 11-07-2007 01:53 PM #66th degree Black Belt
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 907
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 3x in 3 Posts
- Rep Power
- 30
Re: perfect fusion reaction
Are you trying to make a bomb?
sally.
- 11-07-2007 02:02 PM #7Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,265
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
Re: perfect fusion reaction
More of a theoretical bombshell. Originally Posted by sillysally Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 11-07-2007 02:48 PM #86th degree Black Belt
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 907
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 3x in 3 Posts
- Rep Power
- 30
Re: perfect fusion reaction
The sun is a real bomb.
sally.
- 11-07-2007 02:55 PM #9Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,265
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
Re: perfect fusion reaction
Not until it become a nova or a supernova and I only hope it's not tomorrow, or the next day, or the next day, or ... Originally Posted by sillysally Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 11-07-2007 03:12 PM #10Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
Re: perfect fusion reaction I would consider the reason there is so few is that there is no need of more?Were it Originally Posted by AntonioLao 
otherwise,then the law of corrospondences would have supplied it!
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 AM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
