It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > Cosmology > Universe Expansion
Reload this Page questions answered
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
questions answered
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,232
Thanks Given: 692
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
questions answered - 11-06-2007, 02:29 PM

Questions answered but these answers cannot be generally accepted at this time. They are simply the results of personal conjecture and hypothesis.

Question: Why is the universe expanding?
Answer: Primary forces are repulsive. Since they cannot be destroyed because they are weaved into the spacetime fabric, the best they can do is to stretch the spacetime fabric when and where they move away from each other.

Question: Why is the expansion accelerating?
Answer: Since the primary forces are related to the absolute acceleration by direct variations. As the forces increase then the accelerations also increase. Furthermore, this acceleration is independent of inertial mass content (4%) of the universe but it does depend on the gravitational mass increase.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: questions answered
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,276
Thanks Given: 338
Thanked 652x in 623 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 91
   
Smile Re: questions answered - 11-06-2007, 02:36 PM

Thanks Antonio,are not all our questions personel?



regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: questions answered
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nice
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,752
Thanks Given: 15
Thanked 141x in 118 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 33
   
Re: questions answered - 11-06-2007, 03:25 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
Question: Why is the universe expanding?
The physical spatial density between the galaxies is decreasing as they move apart.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Question:Why is the expansion accelerating?
The physical spatial density between the galaxies is decreasing as they move apart.


David
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: questions answered
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,232
Thanks Given: 692
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
Re: questions answered - 11-06-2007, 03:51 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
are not all our questions personel
No, not all. Objective questions can create empirical testing and verification. Subjective questions need the assistance of a professional psychiatrist.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing
The physical spatial density between the galaxies is decreasing as they move apart
But what force allow physical spatial density to move apart?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: questions answered
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Orange Belt
unwritten is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 21
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rep Power: 0
   
Re: questions answered - 11-06-2007, 04:39 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
No, not all. Objective questions can create empirical testing and verification. Subjective questions need the assistance of a professional psychiatrist.

But what force allow physical spatial density to move apart?

why would this
phenomenon
be limited to big things like galaxies?
if it's all expanding, then so am i,
yet i know i wear the same hat size as
i did ten years ago...

can consciousness expand,
within a limited time bound body?
this thinking could imply the universe is finite,
and it is our view of it that expands...
i guess that makes it a view-i-verse

early views & ideas were too small,
so when we arrive at the limit of the view of
ourselves, we will simulataneously find the limit of the universe...
meanwhile both co-expand...



or it's only one of balloons that God is inflating
for his 1 ?illionth birthday party!


“A brain writes, reads & comprehends simultaneously,
so it must know what it intends to convey before beginning.
Therefore all this writing, reading and comprehending
is merely a function of The Mind's way of communicating
through this one particular specialized medium, i.e the evolved human brain.
Seen this way, the (human) brain is nothing more
than copywriter and editor of the mind's content-creating infinity.”

jjacques
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: questions answered
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,232
Thanks Given: 692
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
Re: questions answered - 11-07-2007, 11:58 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by unwritten
if it's all expanding, then so am i,
Not all but only the space-time structures that are decoupled from matter and energy a million years after the big bang.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: questions answered
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nice
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,752
Thanks Given: 15
Thanked 141x in 118 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 33
   
Re: questions answered - 11-07-2007, 01:51 PM

Force is a rather ambiguous term. The property of substance that produces force and also energy is motion. IMO the uniform motion is being removed from the universe leaving only randomized vibration motions of substance (spacetime) to expand to longer wavelengths. It’s like saying that it gets colder faster with the increase of distance. If you consider that uniform motion is what produces mass, things make more sense. Uniform motion also allows the bonding property of the FS the time needed to condense the substance; black holes are examples of such condensing on a grand scale and subatomic particles are examples of such condensing on a more modest scale. IMO that’s the process of gravity and all the other so-called forces of nature.


David
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dleviwing For This Useful Post:
AntonioLao (11-07-2007)
Re: questions answered
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,232
Thanks Given: 692
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
Re: questions answered - 11-07-2007, 01:58 PM

Dave,

But could we detect uniform motion and use it to make a perpetual machine?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: questions answered
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nice
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,752
Thanks Given: 15
Thanked 141x in 118 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 33
   
Re: questions answered - 11-07-2007, 02:20 PM

Any ideas how to do it on a large enough scale? Most uniform motion is tied up in subatomic particles. Converting it to random motion only results in energy.


David
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dleviwing For This Useful Post:
AntonioLao (11-07-2007)
Re: questions answered
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,232
Thanks Given: 692
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
Re: questions answered - 11-07-2007, 02:25 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing
Any ideas how to do it on a large enough scale?
Nope. But large-scale uniform motion would definitely overflow any large vessel.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump