Holy Smokes! The church is on fire?
Thompson (as described by Sullivan, Ibid.), repeatedly checks the experiment and its mathematical confirmation; repeatedly gets the same results, and then dismisses the entire finding.
http://www.spaceandmotion.com/help/introduction-physics-philosophy-metaphysics-space.htm
4-D accelerating expansion to macrocosmic infinity.
The below illustrations are excerpted from Geoff Haselhurst's Wave Structure of Matter Spherical Standing Wave
(Two Dimensional Cross Section)
(Interior becomes increasingly more dense with approach to center, squared to microcosmic infinity. - K. B. Robertson 5/18/07 Re: 'Waveicle') 
'Zero Point', generating a standing wave. Perished the disturbing thought. Before it spread indefinitely. Along with everything else that couldn't possibly be expanding. Even though he just proved otherwise. Saved the physical universe from 4 dimensional expansion. Been keeping General Relativity's most famous dimension, motionlessly suspended in three static, tenaciously non-expanding dimensions, ever since.
______________
BigBang 'quintessence' (dark matter; etc.) shoplifts from 'abandoned' Lambda & Steady State (Shhhush)
"Concepts that have proven useful in ordering things can easily attain an authority over us such that we forget their wordly origin and take them as immutably given.
They are then rather rubber-stamped as a "sine-qua-non of thinking" and an "a priori given", etc.
Such errors make the road of scientific progress often impassable for long times.
Therefore, it is not at all idle play when we are trained to analyze the entrenched concepts, and point out the circumstances that promoted their justification and usefulness and how they evolved from the experience at hand.
This breaks their all too powerful authority.
They are removed when they cannot properly legitimize themselves; they are corrected when their association with given things was too sloppy; they are replaced by others when a new system can be established that, for various reasons, we prefer."
- Einstein, "Ernst Mach", Physikalishe Zeitschrift 17 (1916), 102; Collected Papers vol. 6, Doc. 29
(P.S. Don't tell anybody about the Big Bang Gangologist's adoption of the formerly abandoned Cosmological Constant & Steady State theories, in order to 'maintain' the desperately stricken, anemically perished 'big bang beginning', ok? <They abbreviated it as 'LCDM', for 'LambdaColdDarkMatter'.> Maybe no one will be watching them, while they deign to do it in the road... <'What big bang makeover?'> Oh yes. They've gone through the line w'out paying for the abducted CC ( /\ Lambda) and Steady State; so far, it - 'the normal adjustment' - continues to be no big shakes...)
_______________________________
'TIME Magazine’s Man Of The 21st Century':
Einstein's 4-D universe is not an option in today's academia. Ostracized - banned; anathematized - from the classroom.
Why? Because it can't - mustn't - be where it is: everywhere .
The entire (perpetually ignored or actively dismissed) finding is Albert Einstein's allegedly 'immeasurable' and 'incomprehensible' 4-Dimensional Space-Time Continuum. The physically (spatially and materially) expanding universe...
What is happening here and ever since, is, G.P. Thompson, with J.W.N. Sullivan and the entire scientific community looking over his shoulder, is opting to subjectively over-rule and contradict the objectively proven and demonstrated, prevailing conditional reality, on the now very familiar and equally over-employed and foregone premise that it subjectively appears 'blatantly obvious' that Physical Reality-At-Large 'is not' (4-Dimensionally) expanding.
That is to say, Thompson did not simply fail to recognize and acknowledge the direct implications of his discovery. He, and J.W.N. Sullivan refused, and all physicists since then complicitly continue to refuse to recognize and acknowledge its meaning and its abundantly measurable, observable, even prosaically *audible manifestations.
(The very *sound of 4-D gravity is revealed, before this dissertation closes.)
This is contrary to scientific method.
And, Sullivan, is not through, yet.
Continued Profound (3-D anguish stricken)
Disconcertion(s):
I won't blame any who may not believe this next quote. I don't believe it either, and it's on pages 103 & 104 of THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE. Author Scientist J.W.N. Sullivan, summarily endorses and punctuates Thompson's dismissal of the experimental results (2+2 must equal 5). "As long as we are considering an individual electron, we could be mislead into thinking that its waves are physical realities. Each electron in fact demands a 3-Dimensional Space to itself. This makes it obvious that these waves are merely a mathematical phantom; consequently it is profoundly disconcerting to find that experiment confirms their existence. The apparent congruity between calculation and experiment must be in some sense illusory. It is extremely difficult to avoid the conclusion that the experiments and their results have yet to receive their proper interpretation."
- Pages 103 & 104 of THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE, by J.W.N. Sullivan (again):
“These disturbed areas which are discovered to demand 3-Dimensions of Space indicate the position of the electron; yet we cannot state that the disturbed area is the electron. Because any such locality has a tendency to spread, and if the matter of the universe were a number of disturbed areas, by now it would have spread indefinitely."
(Indeed it has, and so it will continue, maintaining the same relatively uniform density, from one moment to the next, ad infinitum - yesterday's square mile is much smaller and more dense than today's, and today's is much smaller and more dense than tomorrow's; squared. All frames of reference remaining relatively equal; the infinitely small being no less endless and dense than the infinitely large is endlessly more thin and tenuous...Electromagnetic gravity is relatively stronger - constituting 'nuclear forces' - in the comparative earlier moments and relatively weaker in the comparative later moments of the continuous universal expansion. The value of time also changes, corresponding with the value of space it occurs in. More will be said about this, later.)