Extremely Difficult To Avoid Unstable Disturbed Areas In The Recent, Profoundly Disconcerting History Of Science, Which Have Yet To Receive Their Proper Interpretation.’
Continued:

P.D. Ouspensky, has the same kind of trouble
(identifying the 4-D space-time continuum)
in his NEW MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE.
An entire chapter entitled The 4th Dimension.

Ouspensky sets an example of being so near and yet so far...
“It is difficult to describe even approximately the significance which the discovery of the 4th perpendicular in our Universe would have for our knowledge. The conquest of the air. Hearing and seeing at a distance establishing connections with other planets (May we start with establishing connections on this planet?) or with other solar systems; all of this is nothing compared with the discovery of a new dimension.”

(What about the 4th dimension of space-time-gravity, the 5th of electricity, the 6th of magnetism? How much less are all of those projected ‘nothings’, compared with this ensemble of newly discovered physical dimensions?)

Ouspensky continues:

“But so far it ('the discovery of a new dimension') has not been made ."

What We Must Do, continued:
“We must recognize that we are helpless before the riddle of the 4th dimension, and we must try to examine the problem within the limits accessible to us.” - P.D. Ouspensky, Chapter: THE 4TH DIMENSION, in the title: A NEW MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE. p. 68

(*With due respect, sir: How about a drop in the bucket?)


Geoff Haselhurst

All the answers are there, looking up at the observer - ut infra, ut supra - not caring a ripple if the accelerating solutions therein are recognized or not...

(Post Script: The larger a given system becomes, the faster it expands, the larger it gets, ad infinitum. The same amount of energy distributed over an increasingly greater space <no contradiction of the law of conservation of mass-energy>. Lorentz contraction accompanying - linear - velocity of a given system is as it is observed from the outside; whereas, the observers from within a given coordinate system experience no contraction. The specific import of this statement will be clarified with the progression of this report.)


For an even more detailed documentary of the remarkably employed Art Of Missing The 4-Dimensional Point, refer pages 69 thru 97 in P.D. Ouspensky’s A NEW MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE. This is a very well written and illustrated book and chapter (The 4th Dimension), by a deservedly esteemed and dedicated author - well worth reading. Ouspensky exemplifies and dramatizes the standard refusal to recognize what is proven - over-ruling results of objective experiment and mathematics with subjective misunderstandings.

How 'misled we can be into thinking that waves are physical realities.' Whereas, physical reality at large is ‘obviously not expanding.’ 'Clarifying' that all experimental proofs of the expansion of the physical universe at large - what is unanimously encountered and uniformly denied here - are merely 'mathematical phantoms.'
The 'profound disconcertion' being that there's something here that isn't being recognized, and we (formally recognized scientists) are afraid someone is going to run into it (provide the illusory ‘phantom’ with its so far unoffered and actively denied, long belated 'proper interpretation', and non-mathematically make it conceptually accessible to everyone,), before we do. (Boo?). ‘We could be misled into thinking’...

How ‘Indefinitely Spreadable’ It Is
George Gamow, in one mighty peculiar sentence, shows us what's wrong with Einstein's Cosmological contribution.
"Einstein's Cosmological Constant is unstable, and might *start expanding or contracting at the slightest provocation." - George Gamow, GRAVITY.
(Yes?) ((Well?)) (((Say When?)))


Dear George Gamow:
Please do let us know when and where it *stops.

( Here it comes again.)
4-D MassField Doppler Effect
Consider the physical definition of an expanding field. The singular definition for all expanding field systems is: 'A measurable and definable area or system of or within space, which is inherently and constantly growing larger (or smaller).
Such definable field areas of space may have any number of dissimilarities. But all manifestations of expanding field energy have in common one inevitable characteristic.
Consider the comparative relationship of two otherwise totally unrelated fields. Specifically, we will compare the qualities of an expanding field of sound with that of an expanding field of electromagnetism - which is light. (Refer to Drawing 1 Illustrations 5 & 6)


In the example of a field of sound, consider a simple mechanical alarm clock which is ringing, but not otherwise moving relative to an observer. The innermost circle represents the outside diameter of the alarm clock itself; of course the concentricity's emanating from center - the ringing alarm clock - represent the systematic structure of sound waves projecting omnidirectionally from it. In the case of sound, the field is expanding from the alarm clock @ slightly less than 1,100 ft. per-second.

Note, that the sound-Field system which is circumscribed by and contained within the area encompassed by the outermost (largest; oldest) sound wave is completely symmetrical (illustration 5); that is to say, it has the same uniform structure in any direction from the center-source and throughout all of its parts.

Now consider the above diagram of a ringing alarm clock as a source of light rather than sound. Whereas, light does not require a conducting medium to support its motion through space from its source, and sound does, and, whereas light moves at 186,282 miles-per-second as compared to the l,lOO foot seconds of sound. Nevertheless, what these two comparatively considered fields do have in common becomes graphically evident when either or both of them are in motion relative to an observer.

That commonalty is a well known phenomenon, originally discovered in the mid-1800's by the Austrian physicist, Christian J. Doppler. This phenomenon is acknowledged to be invariably characteristic of all expanding fields. It is called 'Doppler effect', or sometimes 'Doppler shift/ contraction'. The definition of which is: 'The contraction of any field system in the direction of its motion at a rate increasingly proportional to the velocity of its (center) source'.

When we consider the field source to be a ringing alarm clock, we observe in that case the indicated left-to-right motion of the alarm clock - or the right-to-left motion of the observer - to be approximately one half the speed of sound.

When we consider the moving source of the field to be a light-field source rather than a sound-field source; we then consider the left-to-right moving source or the right-to-left moving observer to be moving at approximately 4/5ths the speed of light.

Under these circumstances, the field is no longer symmetrical. The structure is not uniform in all directions from the source and throughout all of its parts. It is instead contracted in the direction of its motion; the contraction ratio corroborates to relative speed; forming a non-symmetrical field system; reasonably approximated in the referenced illustration.

Let it be emphasized here that Doppler contraction is not and has never been applied to, or recognized as, applicable to Matter (Matter is stringently relegated as a static, non-expanding 'particle', not a field).

I have said that Einstein proved that matter is 4-Dimensional. Yet, I have also said that Doppler effect has never been applied to matter.

This can only mean that Doppler effect is not applicable to matter; for the inevitable reason that matter is not an accelerating 4-Dimensional field after all. Or, that Doppler field contraction is actually applicable-to and exhibited-by matter, but that this application - like the 4th Dimension itself - has yet to be recognized.

Another 4-DIMENSIONAL ULTIMATUM; if you will, and, even for that matter, if you will not. (There is nothing to negotiate

Turn. Or Burn. (Pivot Or Divot) Continued:
Either, matter is found to exhibit Doppler shift and is therefore reconfirmed to be 4-Dimensional. Or, matter does not exhibit any evidence of Doppler shift, and, therefore, cannot possibly be a 4-Dimensionally expanding; accelerating field.