A Little Tiny Point - Stephen Hawking's Universe

[cosvis]

Hi G_burnett and all,

To my understanding of the quantum particle, it is a universal constant with a definite quantity of energy that can not be lost and thus to me, it is the most basic particle of energy. But I agree with you, that light or electromagnetic radiations can be slowed when it is passed through a denser medium eg. light passing through water. However, this does not mean that the individual quanta particles that make up the light, are slowed down or have lost energy; it could mean that the individual quanta particles have to travel further, eg. moving from one atom of the water to another as it moves through the water.

Yours Cosvis.

[G_burnett]

hi Cov

the quantum particle with no linear motion and no spin motion or at absolute rest in potential end does not exist to me except in chaotic theory and instantaneous change to still no zero.

your example of photons to water is best explained in Mr F videos but first to consider would be light going through glass experiment and clearly the motive force or wave created behind the force of the particle worth the visit as would be the cause of reflection and substance composite or left hand materials

to my understanding the state of the quanta particle in motion comes with a dimension of frequency where way way over on the left hand of the Electromagnetic spectrum we have gamma frequency of such low frequency the radiant that there, is massive energy force behind the emit ... a push in effect on other less energy state in the proximity of and in the solar system to us and everywhere in between in density dimension considered of all matter in all state of exist.

To use this state we for*********************************************** ************************************************** ****************************************
ahh sorry my computer is restricting certain transmittal of key words now so some one else will have to continue in this road till i review this again. maybe that worm that got lose from the pub? hmmm

kind regards g.

[Max™]

Take a photon and stretch it's wavelength out to an order of the scale of the visible universe.

I think at that point, it would be fundamentally indistinguishable from the fabric of spacetime itself.

[cosvis]

Hi G, Max and all,

I agree with you G that a quantum particle can not have any rest state and it is constantly moving. I also believe according to scientific studies, that the frequency of one quantum particle is one and the frequency of a light beam depends on the quantity of quanta particles each light beam with a specific frequency, carries. A very high frequency beam of light would carry a higher quantity of quanta particles than one with a lower range of frequency. The frequency ( f ) of a wave motion is given as:
f = c / y
where ( c ) is the velocity of propagation and ( y ) is the wavelength. In the case of a quantum particle ( c ) stands for the speed of light. The frequency of a quantum of electromagnetic energy is given by:
f = E / h
where ( E ) is the quantum's energy and ( h ) is the Plank constant. In my understanding of a quantum particle, it consists of two equal but opposite gravitational and kinematic forces.

Yours Cosvis.

[G_burnett]

Hi G, Max and all,

I agree with you G that a quantum particle can not have any rest state and it is constantly moving. I also believe according to scientific studies, that the frequency of one quantum particle is one and the frequency of a light beam depends on the quantity of quanta particles each light beam with a specific frequency, carries. A very high frequency beam of light would carry a higher quantity of quanta particles than one with a lower range of frequency. The frequency ( f ) of a wave motion is given as:
f = c / y
where ( c ) is the velocity of propagation and ( y ) is the wavelength. In the case of a quantum particle ( c ) stands for the speed of light. The frequency of a quantum of electromagnetic energy is given by:
f = E / h
where ( E ) is the quantum's energy and ( h ) is the Plank constant. In my understanding of a quantum particle, it consists of two equal but opposite gravitational and kinematic forces.



Yours Cosvis.

there are some of the above define i would expand on to better clarity but i also do not rule out the quantum partical could and is in nature not in motion at times but is in motion in the all still and at varied times created state of frozen in a cerrtain permanency of state.

[cosvis]

Hi G_burnett and all,

The quantum particle is a fascinating and unique particle in the universe. I believe it is the smallest possible constant particle of the universe that has two unique phenomena: it has a gravitational and thus a mass or particle phenomenon and a kinematic or wave phenomenon. It can not loose any energy because it is the smallest quantity of energy in the universe, it is affected by gravity and it moves at the speed of light. Consequently, we have the Heisenberg uncertainty principle; because it moves at the speed of light and it never stops its position and momentum of the particle can never be known with unlimited accuracy.

Yours Cosvis.

[Max™]

Nothing with rest mass moves at the speed of light. >.>

An object with relativistic mass (or motion, basically), can move at the speed of light.

[cosvis]

Hi Max and all,

I did not know that relativity mass can move at the speed of light. Does this mean that Einstein's theory of relativity is incorrect? My understanding of Einstein's relativity mass is that it increases as its relative speed increases and that as it gets near the speed of light, its relativity mass becomes infinite., which is impossible.

In my understanding, only, non-relativity mass, like that of a quantum particle can travel at the speed of light. Non-relativity mass, the quantum particle, is not govern by Einstein's normal relativity laws, but forms it own unique dimension, the quantum dimension which I like to call the fifth dimension of matter.

Yours Cosvis.

[G_burnett]

Hi Max and all,

I did not know that relativity mass can move at the speed of light. Does this mean that Einstein's theory of relativity is incorrect? My understanding of Einstein's relativity mass is that it increases as its relative speed increases and that as it gets near the speed of light, its relativity mass becomes infinite., which is impossible.

In my understanding, only, non-relativity mass, like that of a quantum particle can travel at the speed of light. Non-relativity mass, the quantum particle, is not govern by Einstein's normal relativity laws, but forms it own unique dimension, the quantum dimension which I like to call the fifth dimension of matter.

Yours Cosvis.

Hi Cosvis,

Interesting post, Mr Einstein being highly thought of .... in the case of impossibility, it is possible in using a dimension of relative time for that mass in motion and measure out of that motion, ... inside the event for that moment of event, there is no passage of time.

Out side of that event, we would perhaps perceive the moment here or there at the same time, thus in the event would be in two places at once and everywhere in between at the same time and that percieve out of the event only in a "spookiness" result.

The quantum particle on the Planck scale in transient motion when measured gives us a view that includes a reality of matter in exist (having mass) because the viewing changes the state of energy in directional linear form to a perceivable more static non linear state or circular motion being the state if not smashed. ... we change the picture just by looking at it.

IMHO ~regards graham

[Max™]

Relativistic mass is merely referring to the motion of a photon, it isn't the same as rest mass. I fear the terms have gotten mixed up here.