Good thought, Prof.
If only there could be an economic collapse, then every day could have the peace and tranquility of a snow day.
Should I invest in ToeQuest stock?
The work does pay pretty well, Prof, as an investment in learning. How are doing on your deadline to find Everything? We can give you a bail-out if you need more money. ToeQuest stock went up today.
However, the 'C', the 'P', and the 'T' would imply 3 irreducible directional invariance. The permutations or combinations of C and not C, P and not P, or T and not T give 8 distinct directional invariance properties.Originally Posted by profpat
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Hi Antonio;
I was just discussing the problem of symmetry with CPT on my An Idea thread. If you get a chance you may wish to view it.
My thought was :
Since the primal point was a singularity then all forces should be one and you have total symmetry. The fact that we have this universe tells us that symmetry had to be broken somewhere. So what can we learn regarding our initial universe from this broken symmetry.
Best,
Pat
The singularity is possible only if the infinity of equal primary forces point inward at a point analogous to all points on the spherical surface pointing toward the center simultaneously. Primary forces are defined as vector quantities equal in magnitude but not necessarily equal in direction. Two opposite primary forces always create a dynamic equilibrium around the circumference of an arbitrary circle. The smallest circle could then given a radius of Planck length.Originally Posted by profpat
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
So would my description of the neutronic sphere, where all forces ( the 8 color symbol forces ) vectors pointing to the center work as an original model for the universe?
Please say of course it would.
profpat,
If you add directions to your static positional model then the resulting dynamic model would be more properly described by Hopf topology of double infinity. Note, in this sense, direction implies certain local infinitesimal motion hence spacetime quantization at the local region of spacetime.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
You're right Antonio;
I would love to have a computerized dynamic model showing the possible interactions between the complementary opposites. It's my understanding that the color charge changes 10 to the 24th power every second. VERY DYNAMIC AND ENERGETIC.
I would also see if it's a stacking of the protons limitation which brings on the preceived weak force. I think the required proton stacking would account for the electron shells.
There is other things I would like to program if I was computer literate.
Best,
Pat
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)