About every six months or so the world press and scientific journals at large will report on contradictions and disqualifications of Einstein's theories. Modifications of the works of Newton and Einstein, for example, do correctly occur. Whereas, until the foundations of physical science represented by Newton and Einstein, for example, are replaced with some more improved system, the displacement of the work of the issued giants of science is confined to whatever slight adjustment, accompanied by whatever somber or hype dissertation.
Then, there are the ambitions of physicists attempting to discover, isolate or insulate gravity waves (Refer 'gravitons').
And yet, like the 4th Dimension, the only appropriate question regarding phenomenological gravity, is, 'Where is it not?'.
Yet still, Contemporary Physics and its mentors continue to brush aside electromagnetism (in the micro and macrocosms) in - high and low, large and small - probes, hunts, expeditions and searches for gravity waves (Where are they not? The bespectacled adventurers are wearing the corrective lenses they're frantically looking for).


Word stew follows:
"Although relativity theory replaces gravity by a geometrical warping of space-time, it leaves many basic questions unanswered. Does this warping take place instantaneously through space or does it propagate like a wave motion? Almost all physicists agree that the warping moves like a wave and that these waves travel with the speed of light. There is also good reason (sic) to believe that gravity waves consist of tiny indivisible particles of energy called "gravitons." In 1969, Joseph Weber, at the University of Maryland, announced that his equipment, consisting of huge aluminum cylinders, had detected gravity radiation. It seemed to be coming from cataclysmic events at the center of the Milky Way. Since then, dozens of attempts have been made to confirm Weber's claim, some by physicists with detecting equipment more sensitive than Weber's. The results have been negative. The present consensus is that Weber misinterpreted his readings, and that gravity waves have not yet been observed. (Have not yet been proven).

“As for gravitons, no one has any knowledge of what a graviton is like, although many physicists are trying to invent theories that will predict some of its properties. Presumably it contains a tiny bit of space-time curvature, otherwise large numbers of gravitons would be unable to transmit curvature through space. At the moment the graviton, like the particle physicists' quark,' remains a hypothetical beast that physicists hope someday to capture."
- p. 106, THE RELATIVITY EXPLOSION, by Martin Gardner

Speaking of ‘hypothetical beasts’:
(Why the opposition is out of 3-D time & space, continued
WHY: THE (Lemaitre's original) BIG BANG THEORY IS WRONG


The Big Bang Universe has a (speculatively presumed super split second) beginning and a speculatively presumed (entropic heat death) ending.

Unlike the Steady State Theory; which for many substantial and eloquent reasons does not proffer a beginning or ending; which (Steady State Theory) was abandoned, because the (recently and unexpectedly discovered) proven expansion of the spatial universe must result; inevitably in the dissipation of occurrent numbers (density) of objects occupying given units of space over extensively progressive periods of time.

A Steady State Theory projects a general uniform density of space, rather than a dissipating space projected in a *Big Bang translation of Universal History.

From the more dense - relatively smaller - past; into the increasingly less dense and ever-enlarging future. *Big Bang dictated Space always becoming more dissipated, 'thinning out' with increased passage of time in the spatially expanding, 'Big Bang'. Which is what is (what was originally) said to inevitably result when the dissipating universe of the present and future, is back-tracked into the conceptualized universal (consequently ever smaller and more dense) 3-D past...

Eventually intersecting very densely, when and where, due to tremendous gravitational pressures and resulting high temperatures: an explosion (*Big Bang) is said to have occurred- proclaimed by the big bang gang to be the cause of the recently (and quite unexpectedly) discovered, spatially expanding universe - *therefore 'inevitably' thinning out with the passage of time (often said to be enroute a conceptually accompanying, imminent forthcoming, 'entropic heat death').

Big Bang Cosmology. Product of a desperately concocted (1927 emerged, Henry Silpher discovered, Edwin Hubble refined, Lemaitre generalized), ad hocly makeshift history. The big bang theory is ad hoc, in the sense that it was conjured up in hurried response to the unexpected discovery that the entire spatial universe is expanding (1927- '32, Silpher-Hubble).

Back tracking the observed expansion through past time seems to find the observed expanding universe at a point of convergence - an intersecting point where all the matter of the universe was presumably joined in one singular 'cosmic egg.' What seems inevitably, to be ('therefore') an ending of space. Ergo, 'beginning of space and time.' A 3-D space-monopolising universal beginning.

Yet, there is, in astrophysical proven and agreed upon fact: no common center from which the spatially expanding universe recedes.

The expansion is proven, dynamically structured as though the center (alleged origin of the big bang - said to be the beginning cause of the observed spatial expansion of the universe) is everywhere. No matter the location of any given observation point: the structural dynamics of the observed expanding universe are such that always the red-shift recession of the measurable surrounding universe (of receding objects) is: in direct line of sight; moving directly away from points of observation; wherever they are located.


This is not a 3-dimensional signature.

It is the 4-dimensionally prevailing status quo.

Establishing a structural expansion corroborating a physically and spatially expanding - steady state - universe. Where the center is everywhere; as it is in fact observed to be. Proving every point of mass (charge/disturbance; systems of combined particles) and its (their) generation of omni-directionally expanding electromagnetism and gravity: as the collective cause and origin of the observed, red-shift measured expanding universe.

The Big Bang is categorically founded on a 3-D premise. In what is insisted to be an ‘acknowledged’ 4-D Universe.
Refer, George Orwell's 1984 *DOUBLE-THINK & *NEWSPEAK (*Two mutually conflicting parallel lines to infinity : endless gridlock.

The Big Bang imposed retroactive progression to the bygone past's intersection of three dimensions to a point of origin (the anticipated end of retroactively expanding space - traced backwards in time to an inevitable intersection and consequent point of beginning), does not apply to a four dimensional space-time continuum...

The past of which is progressively smaller, to endless 4-D infinity, when the observed, spatially expanding (Big Bang originated; 3-Dimensionally fixated) universe is traced backwards through past time, from the present.

Repeat:

Back tracking the observed spatially expanding universe is popularly said by Big Bang advocates, to eventually arrive at an intersection where space ends: in three dimensions.

There is no open argument against the omniscience of the four dimensional space time continuum here. It is simply and altogether excluded as a solution (refer option/ AKA, ultimatum).

The Big Bang Theory denies/excludes/ignores altogether here, what its perpetrators say they acknowledge (the 4th dimension)...

Meanwhile. The Big Bang Theory instantly goes extinct, when it comes in contact with the (Invisible, What? ) four dimensional space-time continuum.

Whereas, in four dimensions (when space-time is not excluded from the universe, as the Big Bang Theory excludes the 4th dimension altogether), past space goes on ever-smaller forever; smallness proceeding as endlessly as largeness: with the relativistic center (source of expansion) located everywhere in the occurrence of matter-field particles (without a spatial limitation at the falsely assumed and foreseen intersection of all matter, culminating in the alleged explosive <Big Bang> beginning); in the increasingly distant, ever smaller past to infinity, and growing ever larger forever in the increasingly distant future; to infinity.

The formerly abandoned Steady State is re-engaged due to the 4-D expansion of matter with the spatial universe.