The Wavicle Universe?

[Fivedoughnut]

Perhaps the the big bang is an affect of a big crunch.

When the crunch condenses below its Schwarzchild Radius it creates an energy based Lorentz tranformational recursion - we know t=0 at an event horizon. Therefore, beneath this boundary, t becomes negative ..... basically, a duality is formed, the inner convergence creating the out-riding expansion. No need for dark energy huh?

Even the humble photon - I believe, propagative energy of cyclic trans-dimensionality obeys this simple process, one in which convergence produces a point 0-D singularity via its very own swartzchild radius, albiet an extremely small scale distance.

The photonic cycle is one of 720° (360° positive/ 360° negative), in which convergence and expansion co-exist simultaneously.

Expansion above the SR can be thought of as the magnetic component. Similarly, condensation beneath; manifests as the electric component. Thus this duality operates with 180° phase differential, perfectly matching/describing electro-magnetism, with each swapping identities @ the SR boundary.

The electron, positron pair perhaps a manifestation of ring singularity to hypertorus cycle, imbedded in the wavefont surface of our universe, with photons themselves, as integrated wavicles of this electro-positronic wave-state, 'riding' around this hyper-hoop, looping around hyperspace through future and past, in a most cool manner.

[SCarter]

That was way beyond my comprehension, and yet am totally intrigued! I'm picturing the universe as something like a black hole- What allows the crunch to go below the Schwrz. radius?

[Fivedoughnut]

That was way beyond my comprehension, and yet am totally intrigued! I'm picturing the universe as something like a black hole- What allows the crunch to go below the Schwrz. radius?

Not a lot to understand really; just a different approach to explain the underlying mechanism of wave-particle phenomena. One which can be applied to all particles.

With regards to condensation beneath the Schwarzchild radius, what's to stop it? In addition, it can be inferred, as the outriding expansion clearly exists.

[Fivedoughnut]

Even the humble photon - I believe, propagative energy of cyclic trans-dimensionality obeys this simple process, one in which convergence produces a point 0-D singularity via its very own Schwarzchild radius, albiet an extremely small scale distance.

The photonic cycle is one of 720° (360° positive/ 360° negative), in which convergence and expansion co-exist simultaneously.

Expansion above the SR can be thought of as the magnetic component. Similarly, condensation beneath; manifests as the electric component. Thus this duality operates with 180° phase differential, perfectly matching/describing electro-magnetism, with each swapping identities @ the SR boundary.

Hey, if the relativistic photonic mass (btw: I know photons do not possess mass) is used in the follow equations:

Relativistic Mass = hf/c^2 & Schwarzchild Radius = 2GM/C^2,. The Schwarzchild radius of a photon, say in the visible spectrum (around 600 THz) would produce a figure of about 10^-62 meters ..... wow, that's amazingly small!

[Fivedoughnut]

If all particles have a transdimensional wave-state. Then gravity could be assumed to be an energy exchange (induction) from wavefront to wavefront surfaces. This naturally creates morphic asymmetry, as parts of the condensing import wavefront reach their Schwarzchild distance before others - the affect of this simply relocates the singularity spatially (being a purely harmonic buffering reaction to allow singularity formation) ..... as a direct consequence, the particle/mass is seen to accelerate towards the greatest source of inductance.

[Fivedoughnut]

Musing on ..... Your average photon cycles rather more rapidly than our universe, say 300Ghz compared to maybe once in a trillion years - how can this be so? ..... well, it's all to do with dimensionality. With increasing dimensionality - an exponential amount of energy is required, it's simple geometry; i.e the amount of paint required to cover a sphere is significantly greater than that used to coat a circle of identical radius. So what of our universe?, an expanding wavefront of possibly hypertoroidal topology! - Therefore, our universe of high order trans-dimensionality may have energy spread out rather thin. I propose it's energy concentration that determines frequency, just like low energy photons cycle slower than high ones. Photons, despite having amazingly less energy than the universe, have absolute lashings to play about within their preposterously lower dimensional wave-space realm.

[Fivedoughnut]

Musing on further (bored) ...... similarly the electrostatic force is crazily greater than gravity (10^36 times greater) again, I propose this absurdly gargantuan variation is solely accountable to energy distribution differences between markedly dissimilar trans-dimensional topologies.

Don't thank me all @ once.

[William Christie]

Try rotating wave theory of the electron.
http://mypage.direct.ca/c/christie/Wavicle.html

It explains clearly how a particle can be a localized wave hence = particle. Also it exhibits relativistic effects and explaings gravity.

[AntonioLao]

The simplest wavicle that I can think of is this



or this

which are not topologically equivalent. I called one H-plus and the other H-minus.

[labelwench]

Try rotating wave theory of the electron.
http://mypage.direct.ca/c/christie/Wavicle.html

It explains clearly how a particle can be a localized wave hence = particle. Also it exhibits relativistic effects and explaings gravity.

Hello William, and welcome to the forum of TOE Quest.

I have looked at your theory and cut immediately to the conclusion, as I am neither scientist nor mathematician, merely one of those beings 'along for the ride' or journey of life. One sentence in particular jumped out at me and, with your permission requested, I would just highlight it here.

ie., everyone and the apparatus were doing the same thing that light was: being transmitted through space and all together fringe shifting (so to speak) - so there was no net fringe shift.

Thank you for sharing your theory. Having none of my own, I am ever delighted by the concepts of others and appreciative of the sharing.

Regards,

Lorrina