"SPIN... SPIN ... YOU LITTLE ELECTRON!"

humanbydefault · 11:17 AM

"My vision about a quantum heresy called "electron spin"

"The image of science is not helped by stereotypical media coverage either. "Between the scientists labelled as 'boffins' because no-one can see a useful application to their work, and the scientists who are seen as selling out to spin whatever story their commercial sponsors require, we aren't doing ourselves any favours."
Johnny Ball
On thing I haven't included yet in my previous article was the concept of "spin." As you all perfectly know, it's about the same concept that "justify" [according to Bohr's atomic model] the limited number of "electrons" per sub-shells to TWO (2).
Q. Do "electrons outside the atom" show some sort of "spin-configuration" when it comes to spectroscopic and magnetic analysis?
A. Of course they do!
Q. Then... Why are you saying that "electrons" DO NOT SPIN inside the atom?
A. Simply because there are NO "electrons" [as the ones J.J. Thompson took for "corpuscles" in 1897] INSIDE THE ATOM AT ALL!
And THAT ladies and gentlemen is the different between night and day.
As a part of my THEORY I explained to you that all you could find "spinning" around the atomic core was nothing more than standing nuclear waves [a pattern of interference]. It means that a structure of multi-level harmonics [made naturally by energy] spins as a consequence of two incoming waves from [two or more primary] specks of radiation energy.
In the simplest atom of nature [hydrogen] there was no big deal to see why it had a ground state only available to accomodate enough MASS to manufacture-fabricate-modulate one electron once external energy was supplied. However, elements are much more complex than hydrogen as the number of harmonics [piano keys, remember?] start to pile up in their configuration. I have said that BONDS are a common feature at all energy-levels [scales] so this is what HOLDS THE SECRET to WHY we observe "electrons outside the atom" to posses some sort of "spin." For those not familiar with my previous articles I have said pretty clear that "electrons outside the atom" were nothing more than quanta of E-M energy PRODUCED between two different harmonics. If you think of a BOND between two "energy families" [at any scale, no matter which] you'll picture a bond which only reason was to compensate for an energy imbalance. The BECAUSE of WHY a molecule made by two atoms occur is due to an OBVIOUS (electromagnetic) ATTRACTION BETWEN BOTH [I don't think any one could have a different opinion...]. The density of energy "spinning" in each HARMONIC was said to be different... remember that this specific energy I'm talking about here is what orthodox theory call the actual [physical] "number of electrons spinning around the atom."
So! If a BOND is formed between two ENTITIES (COULD BE AT THE NUCLEAR LEVEL, AT THE ELECTRON LEVEL, ETC) and that BOND would look as a MIX of two harmonics located at different (quantum) levels...
Q. Isn't it LOGICAL to conceive that an eventual modulation of INCOMING E-M ENERGY occuring inside a NON-SYMMETRIC BOND would PRODUCE eventually an electron with certain "SPIN"?
Before answering that question let's go back to the STANDING WAVE PATTERN, shall we? You may have experienced the spinning effect at the zone called "anti-node" as I predicted before right? If you haven't read my previous articles NO PROBLEM! just GO to any standing wave Webpage in the Internet AND CHECK IT OUT FOR YOURSELF. You could ACTUALLY "SEE" a spin forming in the pattern, HOWEVER the direction of it could be ANY OUT OF TWO... right? Either FORWARD or BACWARD! That's is what makes possible a TWO-SPIN quantum of energy manufactured inside a BOND. It will depend [this is important!] upon the actual physical ORIENTATION between the two interacting HARMONICS inside the atom or molecule what ultimately will define the SPIN ORIENTATION of the OUTGOING QUANTUM [electron, proton, neutron, etc.].
The same way molecules are oriented in a specific ANGLE. The angle observed in molecules of different atoms is the straight result of the energy-configuration of those harmonics BONDING each other. NO ELECTRONS were ever spinning inside atoms, molecules or crystals! Bonds are made thanks to coupling between harmonics making possible a POTENTIAL modulation of external energy into E-M quanta ["electrons outside the atom"] IN CASE external energy was provided.
THIS is the dirty "SECRET" behind a quantum heresy called SPIN!
Take a moment of your busy life and try to picture the whole thing in your mind! You'll see that it makes PERFECT sense and as Einstein once predicted there could be a theory that would include COMMON SENSE AND LOGIC in the description of reality.
HUMANBYDEFAULT
www.humanbydefault.com

Guille · 11-03-2005, 10:33 AM

There is one thing I always wonder because there are many disagreements.

Is spin a physical property or another kind of property?

humanbydefault · 11-03-2005, 11:20 AM

I hope that my article will give you a sense of direction about such simple concept. Spin is the direct result of the ORIENTATION of harmonics inside the specific bond. You need to understand that there are no actual electrons as physical entities "spinning" around the core. Since the only thing actually spinning is a pattern of energy "tuned" into a harmonic the only hope to PRODUCE an electron [just as photons are made too] is to wait for external energy to be provided in the first place! Before any energy was supplied, no actual INDEPENDENT or ELEMENTAL entity was spinning. I understand is somewhat difficult to see it, but it is the way I see it and it makes perfect sense to me [at least]. Think of it! You may have a positive charge [higher energy density] in the outermost orbital of an atom or simply a negative one, it is the DUAL possible combination of HOW two or more atoms BOND among each other WHAT actually will determined the angle of the molecule configuration. Check once again the standing wave experiment. You could see that both directionality of spin could fit into the picture. Just like in the case of a cubic figure represented on a piece of paper! You could see it in two different positions... right? The same phenomenon happens with standing waves too!
You'll see it my friend!
HUMANBYDEFAULT

humanbydefault

By now now, I assume that you got a pretty good idea of the way I conceive the atomic model. It is NOT a cheap copy of the solar system modified by the "weirdness" of quantum mechanics AT ALL!
Do you have an idea of the details describing TODAY'S atomic model?
Just take a good look at it, cause this is going to be history a few years from now:

http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/light/bohr.html

You can read RIGHT THERE what the actual zeeman effect WAS. A "splitting" of the original spectral line or the scattering of a radiation PRODUCED in subsequent "piano keys" otherwise filled with pure innert MASS before...
Remember that between the actual [physically present] keys in a given scale, there were other POTENTIAL notes which keys were missing.
Q. Why were they missing?
A. Because keys are added with NEW BONDS between "energy families" [atoms of hydrogen]. The more "energy families" get together into the BOND the more complex the atomic structure becomes!
The Webpage I posted above has another interesting feature that I find highly interesting for those who DON'T LIKE TO BE FOOLED by anyone!
LOOK the chapter about "plasma."
Q. What is a plasma?
A. An atom that has been "stripped" from one electron... blablabla! Since there are NO electrons in my atomic model how could you defined PLASMA?
According to you... What would happen if we were able to supply the EXACT AMOUNT of E-M energy to a given harmonic? Obviously the SPINNING energy will cancel each other out "producing the feeling" of an "electron absense... right?
Right! There would be NO MAGNETIC ACTIVITY whatsoever! However that doesn't mean that there is a vacuum in space! Such compensated region of space will contain equal amount of E-M energy spinning in opposite direction and it will also be projected further in space in subsequent SCALES too.
That's why we observe other lines in the spectrum! There is a lot of "empty space" inside the atom that EXPERIMENTALISTS can't figure out WHY!
WELL! that's why! A total and perfectly balanced pattern of standing wave [harmonic] does not mean the "kidnapping" of an "electron" [harmonic] but the perfect FULFILLING of it!
Please, take a moment of your meditation time and think about what I've just told you... If you feel like it, discuss the issue with your physic professor if HE or SHE won't see you as an ALIEN...
If you want to understand the way I see the atomic model just click in the site shown below:

http://www.toequest.com/forum/physics-articles/824-rediscovering-the-atomic-model-part-two.html

HUMANBYDEFAULT
www.humanbydefault.com

humanbydefault · 11-28-2005, 11:37 AM

humanbydefault · **One last thing about spin! -** 02-02-2006, 12:08 PM

Some of you have had the patience to read some of my postings and I am greatfull for that. I just want you to know that I trully believed what I wrote here since the very beginings and I have written my thoughts with the aim of making you think about those fascinating mysteries of our universe. I am not trying to neither imposse nor convince any of you about any of my ideas... To be honest with you, I even think that they will only cause you troubbles with your physics professor just to mention some of them.
Here is one thing that I missed from my articles and postings and could be a clue and a very important one [I may add] to dismiss or accept my theory about the true atomic model.
Remember that I stated in the past that what we considered to be "sub-atomic particles" with their own charge and "mass" where nothing but a spatial projection of harmonics originated in the core of the atom? That no independent particles existed in this universe of ours but two possibilities only:
One: a complex set of harmonics borned from the interference between two or more speks of tiny points of radiation.
Two: Quanta modulated on those patterns from external sorces once those were "processed" by the above.
In two words, what we consider to be "sub-atomic particles" "flying" in the vacuum [being vacuum referred to air, and even the interior of atom-smashers] were nothing but a quantum of energy "processed" by the interaction of a previously supplied energy with those patterns called atoms.

The new part if that the SPIN in all the harmonic patterns has to be the same in orientation for my theory to be SOUND!
A "proton" inside the nucleus has to be +1 and it projected electron also +1!

HUMANBYDEFAULT