[humanbydefault]

The best example of how wrong a theory could become will be explained to you using nothing but the arguments supporting "quantum tunneling." As it has always been my "style" I will have the courtesy to introduce you with a simple and brief [orthodox] description of quantum tunneling. Prepare yourself to be "impressed" by macroworld analogies... Footballs trying to defy gravity in its attempt to go up the hill and getting away with it in a literal act of magic...!
Ready to be entertained once again? GOOD! Then click the site below and read the way "they" will prepare you [and your mind] to accept a wromg theoretical explanation of one of the SIMPLEST and LOGICAL phenomenon of nature... GO!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunneling

It wasn't that bad, was it? I could understand that by now you may feel terribly CONFUSED with the analogy... Forget the part about George Gamow and the Alpha praticle for the time being. I don't want you to feel lost about the true nature of tunneling. Alpha particles [the atom of Helium] are scattered from the atomic nucleus because the last BOND that used to attached them to the group of "energy families" was "broken." Tunneling is not a fact and it never was a fact in "Alpha decay" No matter who said it and no matter the Noble Prize behind it... So, pay attention to my story and JUDGE BY YOURSELF!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let's point the dots on top of the i(S)... [a literal translation of an old spanish expression].
Q. Do electrons "tunnel" from point A to point B?
A. ABSOLUTELY NOT! The correct way to express what really happens is far from the way it is described in every single document about it.
As always has been in the past: Bohr's atomic atom is to blame for it!
In my atomic model "electrons" [as the same "corpuscles" measured in 1897 by J.J. Thompson in catode rays] are NOT PRESENT. Instead, all we find is a structure of harmonics spinning in different energy levels.
NOW! I'LL NEED YOU TO OPEN YOU MIND TO EVERY WORD I'M GOING TO SAY:
If the harmonic structure of the atom could be seen as different levels, and if those levels are determined by the actual ENERGY DENSITY spinning around the core, Isn't it LOGICAL to assume that the net energy "contained" in ONE ELECTRON produced inside an "electronic harmonic" would be TOO MUCH to be "transfered" into another located ONE OCTAVE further away?
(Read twice this question if you need it, cause the answer is just in front of you!) What's the physical name for the process where a quantum of energy is REJECTED due to a missmatch of energies?
TRANSPARENCY! Of course! So, an electron produced at a higher atomic oscillator [harmonic] could not transfer its energy [completely] into the next octave! It is the voltage [electricla potential] applied to the material that supplies a perfect match of external E-M energy fitting exact match into the next harmonic. This "next harmonic" is as I have said many time in the past a "spatial projection of deeper harmonics created inside the core of the atom."
Does IT has a name? NOT YET! BUT I COULD TELL YOU ONE THING: That harmonic, spreaded in space way far from the outermost electronic boundary, has been viewed by physicists as "the wave function of the electron."!!!!
My next post [right here] will explain the concept using the greatest application of it:
The scanning tunneling microscope. Don't miss it either!

HUMANBYDEFAULT
www.humanbydefault.com

What's been seen as a "mathematical-virtual-formalistic wave function" is the best evidence proving the EXISTENCE of octaves [harmonics] further up from "electronic ones." In the STM a voltage is applied between the STM and the surface of the material. Varying the "tension" between those two points the actual E-M being supplied to the atoms inside the STM is also being regulated.

Allow me to give you the orthodox side of the story and I'll continue later in this post with mine:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scannin...ing_microscope

As you can see the STM use the actual DISTANCE between the surfaces and the voltage applied to produce the conditions to "tunneling."
There was never any tunneling of electrons and I'll explain that right now!
"The mass spinning in the atomic oscillator is the actual capacity for modulating a quantum of energy" [I'm quoting my ideas here]
So one octave further away from the actual electronic orbit will find again the "lepton factor" depicted by me in the article dedicated to the atomic model.
It is the proper regulation of incoming E-M energy what will eventually allow the modulation of a lepton with the energy of ONE ELECTRON [the only one allowed by the universe to propagate OUTSIDE crystal]
There is an interesting experiment performed by Dr. Konstantin Likharev, one od the pioneer investigator of tunneling, He used two plaques with a difference of voltage between them and he lower the external temperature of the LAB to close zero K. What he observe was a revelation! E-M energy start "piling up" just as a drop of water in one side of the "condenser." When the net energy accumulated in one side was exactly that of ONE ELECTRON CHARGE the "drop" suddenly jump into the "air" and hit the other plaque!
He proved that the universe won't allow any electron with less or more energy that the one J.J. Thompson measure in his catode ray experiment. But that does not mean that it is possible for an atom to "build" an electron using harmonics even far away from the one we identified as "electronic orbit."
THAT'S WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS IN THE STM!!! It was not a regular electron produced in a regular harmonic what made the JUMP! It was a completely new quantum PRODUCED in an "octave-harmonic" from the electronic one. The TIME-DILATION observed in the process of tunneling by Dr. Likharev could be explained by the CONDITIONS an OCTAVE-HARMONIC needed to accumulate enough energy to SATISFY the demands of the UNIVERSE! It may sound lidicrous but it is the only explanation for BOTH events! A tunneling electron was the result of the manufacture of a new electron made in an octave-harmonic with no connection whatsoever with a previous electron. It was a different story...

HUMANBYDEFAULT
www.humanbydefault.com

According to the Internet encyclopedia:

"A Quantum Dot, also called a semiconductor nanocrystal, is a semiconductorcrystal whose size is on the order of a few nanometers to a few hundred nanometers. These quantum dots confine electrons, holes, or electron-hole pairs (so-called excitons) to zero dimensions...to a region on the order of the electrons' de Broglie wavelength. This confinement leads to discrete quantized energy levels and to the quantization of charge in units of the elementary electric charge e..."

Let's then see what we've got! An electron charge (e) CONFINED into a small "region" [of space I could imagine...]. You could see the note there [de Broglie wavelength] and no mention about a little cohesive particle with mass at all! Isn't it too convenient?
I'll ask you to follow me in this brief analogy, please! Remember when we mentioned TUNNELING? I explained [in a complete opposition to what it's been said] that NO ELECTRON ever "tunneled through a barrier." I denied such statement today and 100 years from now if necessary! I said that the same [voltage] or externally supplied E-M energy (at some point) was able to FIT the same magnitude of energy that enabled a specific HARMONIC to produce ONE ELECTRON CHARGE [PIECE BY PIECE if necessary]. I also said (quoting my ideas) that the place where that "electron" was manufactured corresponded to an OCTAVE well away from the last "electronic harmonic" we considered to be the LAST BOUNDARY [blamed to the magics of a virtual wave function even we have...!]. However! in the case of tunneling too it's easy to conceive that the energy corresponding to one electron [that never actually tunneled through anywhere] got "trapped" spinning with no chance to continue its propagation (see what I said about Dr. Likharev observations). Isolating one electron charge in a way that every possible "wave-continuity" has been denied is everything it's needed to obtain a quantum dot! Let's make things clear once and for all! A perfect match of E-M energy made to stay inside the harmonic spinning on lieu of mass! The famous GAP they talk about is the basis for the isolation that guarantees such phenomenon. All you need is to provide the exact match of E-M energy into any "electronic harmonic" (or its extended octave) simultaneously isolating every possible "scape" of the wave. By constructing GAPS between the dot and the rest of the semiconducting material enegy has no way to continue its propagation through the lattice.
As long as we IGNORE the actual "link" between nuclear and "electronic" harmonics inside a NEW ATOMIC MODEL, we will find ourselves LOST in conjectures and serendipity-related "discoveries." Let's change the OLD and OBSOLETE idea of "sub-atomic particles" with a mass of their own [No one could tell the origin of it] and the absurd idea of INDEPENDENT ENTITIES when referring to them. Those harmonics borned in the very core of the atom extend the spectrum of energy into octaves well beyond our understandings. A more integral and profound understanding of the atomic structure is the first step into the solution of those puzzles.
I read not long ago in some Internet site that "classical physics" was flawed! What an ignorant idiot could say that! Have you ever learned about the concept called HOLISM? That's what this is all about! We studied and defined what is today known as classical physics because that is the world we move! The scale our senses are evolved to accept! We keep talking about the origin or the end of our universe and the best we could do is show some PRIMITIVE MATHEMATICS and a bunch of philosophical "theories." The TOE is possible and it will guide us to find THE CONNECTION between all scales. Classical physics is a marvelous fruit of science into its own SCALE! I consider those who blame old theories in favor of others without considering scales and boundaries as trully HUMAN SHAME!

HUMANBYDEFAULT
www.humanbydefault.com

I believe that one of the greatest problem in the making of a quantum dot is referred to the right amount of E-M energy supply into the specific HARMONIC.
We have seen [according to my views of course] that if we supplied a little denser amount of energy into a given harmonic the final result would be its scattering with certain "dynamic energy." I've said that such momentum was the logical response of the universe in the violation of its rules. You see! There is a determined or limited is you will amount of energy that could be "held" inside a spinning pattern (an electronic or any other one). Less would qualify to be REJECTED AT ONCE, too much could be accepted if that energy may be split in an electron and a photon of lesser energy. It's just like handling money! If you pay with a certain amount of money that makes change impossible the transaction won't take place at all.
To reach a situation where a quantum dot is stable we should supply the right amount of E-M energy in a way that both frequency and energy density must match the energy already spinning as part of the pattern or harmonic we will use as "oscillator."
I have thought to use two complimentary photons! This is theoretically an idea of mine and I have no clue it has been already tried or not. The principle behind it is simple, really! Instead of supplying one photon with enough energy to produce one electron, I thought to shine at the same time two photons into the isle where the quantum dot is planned to be built. The disadvantage with just one photon is that it carries an inherent dynamic energy in its propagation through the vacuum. In case two photons were used, the SUM of the energy of both photons will have to be a perfect match of density [equal to the energy of the pattern or harmonic built inside the core of the atom, remember?]. If we make those two photons to "collide" in opposite directions we MAY slow down the dynamic energy carried by both photons during their propagation to a point in which the net energy could be inside the thresholds of the HARMONIC to actually ACCEPT it. I think it worths the effort to experimentally try it.
To get access to other related articles you may click at:
http://www.toequest.com/forum/your-toe-theory/1094-easy-access-my-thoughts-through-simple-index.html

Thanks for visiting my crazy world!
HUMANBYDEFAULT