Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    time is magnetism vice versa

    The title appears simple and far-fetched and runs contrary to common sense. Nevertheless, it is overly stated and overly simplified, although it does hide the true physical meaning, which cannot be described by current mathematical equation using vector analysis or tensor analysis or spinor analysis or even quaternion analysis or twistor analysis.

    In order for time to be equivalent to magnetism, the force of gravity must vanish, then using the second permutation of Lorentz force, the electric field intensity vector becomes equal to the vector product of the velocity vector and the magnetic field intensity vector, [math]V \times B = E [/math]. Taking the absolute values of both sides gives [math] |V||B| \sin \phi = |E| [/math] then dividing by |B| gives |V|\sin \phi =\frac{|E|}{|B|}[/math]. If [math]\sin \phi [/math] is 90 degrees then [math]|V|=\frac{|E|}{|B|}[/math]. However, [math]|V|=\frac {|L|}{|time|}. Therefore, by direct correspondence, length (L) is equivalent to electricity and time is equivalent to magnetism.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  2. #2
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Antonio,

    I wonder why the formulas didn't come out this time?

    Anyway, when you say "x is equivalent to y" then you mean that the size of the measurmenet of x will be equal to the size of the measurement of y, right? Because that is it's mathematicla meaning. But if what you mean is that if there is x there y and viceversa, then you might say it "if an only if x then y" which means x<-->y if there is one, there is the other. Or do you mean another thing apart from these two?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    work best by email

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    I wonder why the formulas didn't come out this time?
    Work best by sending you another email pdf file. Their units are comparable in angular measurements such degrees and radians.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  4. #4
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    Work best by sending you another email pdf file. Their units are comparable in angular measurements such degrees and radians.
    I forgot what "degree" and "radian" meant in maths, can you summarize it?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    radians and degrees

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    can you summarize it?
    A full circle of units radius would have 360 degrees or 2pi radians. 180 degrees would then be pi radians. 90 degrees would be half a pi radians, and so on...
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  6. #6
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    A full circle of units radius would have 360 degrees or 2pi radians. 180 degrees would then be pi radians. 90 degrees would be half a pi radians, and so on...
    What is physically a radian?

    Is it the relationship between the circumference and the degrees?

    A diagram would help.

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    implies rotation

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    What is physically a radian?
    Radian is an angle, it implies rotation in 2 dimensional space from a vector to another. A dihedral angle is a planar angle of solid spherical geometry implies a perfect sphere with one center and great circles or longitude circles and small circles or latitude circles. I must go to work now.. continue later.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  8. #8
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Does it only impply rotation, or can/does it also impply reflection, translation, enlargement....etz?

    If it doesn't, is there any other thing like radians are for rotation, but to the other transformations?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    Does it only impply rotation, or can/does it also impply reflection, translation, enlargement....etz?
    Rotation is a special type of continuous transformation. Besides the angles between lines and angles between planes there are also solid angles measured in staradians. A sphere would have 4pi staradians.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  10. #10
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    Rotation is a special type of continuous transformation. Besides the angles between lines and angles between planes there are also solid angles measured in staradians. A sphere would have 4pi staradians.
    But is there any such thing as radian is to rotation, but something is to another transalation? Is there a something like that for reflection, or translation, or enlargement, etz???

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-18-2008, 01:44 AM
  2. My Project For A Central Time-coordinates System
    By humanbydefault in forum Spacetime
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-13-2006, 10:47 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top