Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Theory of Everything > Your TOE Theory
Reload this Page time is magnetism vice versa
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
time is magnetism vice versa
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
time is magnetism vice versa - 11-11-2005, 12:21 PM

The title appears simple and far-fetched and runs contrary to common sense. Nevertheless, it is overly stated and overly simplified, although it does hide the true physical meaning, which cannot be described by current mathematical equation using vector analysis or tensor analysis or spinor analysis or even quaternion analysis or twistor analysis.

In order for time to be equivalent to magnetism, the force of gravity must vanish, then using the second permutation of Lorentz force, the electric field intensity vector becomes equal to the vector product of the velocity vector and the magnetic field intensity vector, V \times B = E. Taking the absolute values of both sides gives |V||B| \sin \phi = |E| then dividing by |B| gives |V|\sin \phi =\frac{|E|}{|B|}[/math]. If \sin \phi is 90 degrees then |V|=\frac{|E|}{|B|}. However, [math]|V|=\frac {|L|}{|time|}. Therefore, by direct correspondence, length (L) is equivalent to electricity and time is equivalent to magnetism.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
11-11-2005, 01:17 PM

Antonio,

I wonder why the formulas didn't come out this time?

Anyway, when you say "x is equivalent to y" then you mean that the size of the measurmenet of x will be equal to the size of the measurement of y, right? Because that is it's mathematicla meaning. But if what you mean is that if there is x there y and viceversa, then you might say it "if an only if x then y" which means x<-->y if there is one, there is the other. Or do you mean another thing apart from these two?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
work best by email
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
work best by email - 11-11-2005, 02:36 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
I wonder why the formulas didn't come out this time?
Work best by sending you another email pdf file. Their units are comparable in angular measurements such degrees and radians.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
11-11-2005, 03:01 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Work best by sending you another email pdf file. Their units are comparable in angular measurements such degrees and radians.
I forgot what "degree" and "radian" meant in maths, can you summarize it?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
radians and degrees
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
radians and degrees - 11-11-2005, 03:10 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
can you summarize it?
A full circle of units radius would have 360 degrees or 2pi radians. 180 degrees would then be pi radians. 90 degrees would be half a pi radians, and so on...


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
11-11-2005, 03:21 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
A full circle of units radius would have 360 degrees or 2pi radians. 180 degrees would then be pi radians. 90 degrees would be half a pi radians, and so on...
What is physically a radian?

Is it the relationship between the circumference and the degrees?

A diagram would help.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
implies rotation
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
implies rotation - 11-11-2005, 03:47 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
What is physically a radian?
Radian is an angle, it implies rotation in 2 dimensional space from a vector to another. A dihedral angle is a planar angle of solid spherical geometry implies a perfect sphere with one center and great circles or longitude circles and small circles or latitude circles. I must go to work now.. continue later.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
11-11-2005, 04:45 PM

Does it only impply rotation, or can/does it also impply reflection, translation, enlargement....etz?

If it doesn't, is there any other thing like radians are for rotation, but to the other transformations?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
11-13-2005, 02:41 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
Does it only impply rotation, or can/does it also impply reflection, translation, enlargement....etz?
Rotation is a special type of continuous transformation. Besides the angles between lines and angles between planes there are also solid angles measured in staradians. A sphere would have 4pi staradians.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
11-14-2005, 01:08 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Rotation is a special type of continuous transformation. Besides the angles between lines and angles between planes there are also solid angles measured in staradians. A sphere would have 4pi staradians.
But is there any such thing as radian is to rotation, but something is to another transalation? Is there a something like that for reflection, or translation, or enlargement, etz???
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fitz'slatest revision of what Force, Space and Time really are in the wave world. Robert Duncan TOE Theories 3 02-18-2008 01:44 AM
The Pure Mathematics of Space-Time quanta07 Mathematics Articles 9 02-14-2007 09:13 AM
My Project For A Central Time-coordinates System humanbydefault Spacetime 0 03-13-2006 10:47 AM
The Mathematico-Cognition Reality Theory (MCRT) mjgeddes TOE Theory Articles 11 02-10-2006 09:08 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com