[AntonioLao]

the true meaning why proton decay cannot happen until the experimentalists waited for the time of 10 to the power 33 years is that the left hand of creation can only allow energy loans in increments of multiples of 3s of the zero-point energy of the true right handed vacuum.

[Guille]

What I wonder is why there isn't such thing as "electron decay"? shouldn't there be one, in compensation?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE What I wonder is why there isn't such thing as "electron decay"? shouldn't there be one, in compensation?

Electron is not composite as far as quantum field theory is concerned or in other words substructure could not be found by high energy experiments. However, it is widely accepted that a proton is composite of 2 up-quarks and 1 down-quark. So, many believe that it should somehow decay.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Electron is not composite as far as quantum field theory is concerned or in other words substructure could not be found by high energy experiments. However, it is widely accepted that a proton is composite of 2 up-quarks and 1 down-quark. So, many believe that it should somehow decay.

I see. Does this principle of "particle has suvstructure therefore it decays" apply only to femrions, or also to bosons?

(I ask because in my theory photon is not fundamental, so it shoudl decay?)

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE Does this principle of "particle has suvstructure therefore it decays" apply only to femrions, or also to bosons?

This is a very difficult question. I don't have a satisfactory answer even if I have to use my idea about the quantization of spacetime. In my research all fermions and bosons are composite of H+'s and H-'s but the left and right hand of creation only allow the total even numbers of the sum of H+ and H- for mass and energy.