Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    two sides of coherence

    The title of this post could have been written as ‘to think is to electro-magnetize’ in the tradition of two other posts ‘to sleep is to demagnetize’ and ‘to eat is to electrolyze’. However, the final choice is made in order to fish out the similarity between optical coherence and human consciousness for a direct correspondence as a biophysical relation of QBD (quantum brain dynamics).

    What is consciousness? A simple definition would be the separate awareness of space and time for a complete holistic understanding of space-time. But is this space-time the same as in special and general relativity as well as that of quantum field theories? Yes! But instead of speaking it as a single entity it is split back into ‘space’ and ‘time’.

    ‘Space’ is relative to electric field. This spatial relativity gives a definition of spatial frequency response for achieving spatial coherence. ‘Time’ is relative to magnetic field. This temporal relativity gives a definition of temporal frequency response for achieving temporal coherence. The ratio of these distinct frequencies is constant in a given physical theory. If it is the spatial over the temporal then it is the speed of light. In MKS system of measurements the statistical average is 300,000,000 meters per second. The reason behind this constancy is a principle of phase stability.

    Phase stability is an intrinsic adaptive property of space-time for self-adjustment and restoration analogous to elasticity of bulk matter such that the ratio of spatial and temporal attribute remains a constant within the domain of applicability in the space-time evolution of a given process.

    Two sets of quantum-mechanical conjugate variables described by the uncertainty principle are (1) the product of spatial frequency and the change in linear momentum of a quantum field particle (2) the product of temporal frequency and the energy. Both are greater than or equal Planck’s constant of action. If the change in momentum is further decomposed into the product of a possible change in mass and a constant velocity and the change of energy is equivalent to the change in mass by ∆E=∆mc then the ratio of spatial frequency over the temporal frequency is greater or equal to the speed of light. This implies that from space-time point of view the speed of light becomes a tachyon’s lower limit while for normal matter (electron, proton, neutron, etc.) it is an upper limit. This superluminal spatial expansion has been verified by astrophysical observations. Similarly, mental waves of consciousness travel at superluminal speeds to such an extent that they form memory cells which travel back in time, within limit of course. So that brain wave is related to the phase velocity (w), this is always greater than light speed. In general, the group velocity (g) of physical waves is always less than light speed such that the next compound inequality holds g ≤ c ≤ w. Perfect space-time coherence happens exactly when both absolute magnitudes of the phase velocity and group velocity are equal. The particular conditional is |g|-|w|=|w|-|g|=0 and the general conditional is |g-w|=0. The first is the difference between scalar fields while the second is the absolute norm of vector fields.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  2. #2
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Interesting points. But something I'm not sure: do you think that instead of by electrons, we think by photons?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    think by graviton

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    we think by photons?
    We think by 4 photons or 1 graviton or 16 neutrinos (still not sure whether they are normal neutrinos or antineutrinos).
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,626
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: two sides of coherence

    Wec are held firmly within the cohesive embrace of life itself,which expresses us throughout many dimensional outlets,the physical,mental,and spiritual,are but three,there are many more,each dimensional expression is locally held by that dimentional force active within that localised area,now in the physical dimension,coherence has an inbuilt
    disolver of cling,which is of course death!Consciousness remains at death,its cohesive
    enabler exists outside this dimension,the brain however does not and is terminated.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Light at the Edge of Creation
    By michaelrevans@mac.com in forum Introductions
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-20-2006, 08:59 AM
  2. three sides of interference
    By AntonioLao in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-06-2006, 08:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top