New particle discovered disagrees w/current theory!

[mrmike]

A new particle discovered dubbed Y(4362?)was it? You'll find an article on this in one of the latest pop-sci or something. It's C and anti-Charm combined. Does this seem to make any sense? They have the basic building blocks WRONG!!! If only I could find someone to help me make a mathematical translation of my projectively geometrical key... ahh but alas, nobody cares! They've all got theories of their own to waste time with! Aghh!!!! Oh well. Breaking news; a galaxy 13 billion light years away is found, and has the mass 8X the Milky Ways!!! This completely uproots current Big Bang B.S. theory thank God. I was just about ready to freakin' throw up! There was no B.B., there is, as Einstein was right the first time, a 'static' universe. Supermassive dual funnel black holes produce a lot more than just neutrinos like suns are known to... they create whole galaxies, and in the process of doing so, inhale and break up the very particles which KINETICALLY carry all waveforms known. Everything in otherwords is particles. Photons don't exist, they're merely a product of ionic exchange between rotating sets of bosons. A positron is a set of 7 bosons spinning on a plane directed away from a free electron. All is explained using this idea that the unverse is a sea of particles all in great pressure against one-another. Not much space at all ever is found between them, unless you get far away from galaxies where the flow opposition between galaxy bound bosons and it's outbound parts consisting of all particles known. Only in these voids/dead rivers of particles can small neutrinos for example fuse to become bosons once again.

[dleviwing]

mrmike;
Do you view the universe as being contained or confined such to produce a vessel that creates internal spatial pressure?

Do you have a better reference to the new particle?

BTW; Welcome to ToeQuest.

[baudrunner]

A positron is a set of 7 bosons spinning on a plane directed away from a free electron.

mrmike,

Are you suggesting that fermions are made up of bosons? Study the particle chart here to get a refresher on what makes up our reality (just click on the close in the bottom left hand corner of the grey description box to see the whole chart).

[mrmike]

yes, fermions are all paired w/bosons! The two work together to make atomics. The nature of the atom is entirely kinetic.

[mkirkpatrick]

yes, fermions are all paired w/bosons! The two work together to make atomics. The nature of the atom is entirely kinetic.

Does that
include the Proytle atom as well?


kind regards michael.

[mkirkpatrick]

So my friend,you are an origional thinker,are you?
maybe then with your giant intellect,you could begin to educate us poor ignorant #$@%^! Or are we x%^x** as well!I am humbled by you intellect!!

kind regards michael.

[michellemfry]

mrmike, michelle here. There are many established and cherished friendships at this place. We are more than just names and posts here. We have deep and meaningful and encouraging discussions that cause us to learn from one another, teach each other when one is lacking in understanding, and in general, to become more than each other could be by oneself. With what you have brought to the party, I am not sure you would like anyone who treated you the way you have just treated those already here. Please rethink this line of thinking and you are always welcome, should you decide to find your manners.
Sincerely,

[mrmike]

I'm not here to mock anyone and I'd wish the same respect on myself.
You'd think if I were smart enough to know how to use a computer, I would be smart enough to know how outdated the 'protyle' idea is. When someone wastes my time by asking such a futile question, ofcourse it makes me angry because it's wasting my precious time. I suppose I could continue being sarcastic, but I'd rather appeal to others who aren't trying to jerk my chain as if they were speaking to a child who knows squat. I realize I have the true key to T.O.E. and I'll get off by being rude until you kick me off the site for all I care. These words are for those who want to beleive. I bow down to nobody since I need to learn nothing since I have no need of a mathematical translation since it personally will do me more harm than good. I'm building devices based on things I've discovered, and one thing I'd rather not do is see someone else make money off this before I have a chance to. One aspect would be a new process I've found to make carbon bond to carbon for diamond growth.

For those who want to beleive I will start by running you through this most simple brain exercise; (eventually we'll get to diagrams and 3d cad generated stuff)

First imagine that particle physics is really nothing but particles. Then imagine the ideas I described earlier about how the universe works using black holes which expel just as much as they inhale, just in pieces. Inside the boson sets the small particles transit fluidly. All interactions between particles are kinetic, and therefore DeBroglie waves keep every particle in place. A DeBroglie wave in particle physics I've found may do much more than just cause like sized particles to be naturally attracted to eachother. The waves may actually completely dispurse like a rope end that has come untwisted, and eventually collapse again at a distant point to become whole once again. This very simple idea is what I've found makes supersymmetry possible. You would understand more if you could see a diagram of some atomic models I've assembled so I'll have to get to that this weekend if anyone cares. Why do I want to share this info? Not for fame or money I assure you. Only because I fear that if I don't and anything should happen to me, it may not be seen again for many years, so ... etc... etc...

[harmonygirl]

Mr. Mike, when you start off by belittling, then it is very natural that it comes back to you. I think it's great that you want to share, but I think that constructive exchanges can only happen when there is no belittling. If you 'get off' as you say on being rude, I don't expect you to enjoy your time here. I hope, however, that you will enjoy your time here and refrain from insulting other learned members of the community.

[baudrunner]

Maybe you'd better just change your signature, since I think that is what is causing all the ruckus. Better not to listen to those who call you fool for they usually have nothing better to contribute. I would suggest that you curb your enthusiasm because it projects right out of the monitors. You are obviously excited about your ideas. They are only one way of describing theories which aren't all that bizarre. Tell it again, without that condascending sense of presence. I am listening.