related topics for wavicle can be found in this link
http://www.parcellular.fsnet.co.uk/index.htm
related topics for wavicle can be found in this link
http://www.parcellular.fsnet.co.uk/index.htm
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Dear Patrick,
Interesting view. I think we all wavicle addicts should look ONE wavicle as ONE photon as a non-dimension POINT of a WAVE. Remember that ONE photon is ONE quantum of Energy=frequency times Planck's constant. As a dimensionless particle (integer spin) the photon is localized as a point in a 4 dimensional space coordinate system (XYZ plus time) IN the wave front. The same quantum is found in the wave itsel. It is as simple as that.
Antonio Lao's approach, with some changes, will reconcile the particle-wave duality. I am developing a blog to discuss that,
Greetings to all
Antonio,
The link is broken
Thanks for informing me about the broken link. I hope I can repair it but if not we can use the new updated definition of wavicle as the quantum of the space-time continuum whose topology is equivalent to the Mobius topology in two dimensions and the Hopf topology in one dimension and the Klein topology in three dimensions.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Antonio,
I like that better, but it still is rather complex to let us visualize those topologies. I will insist that we should look at a photon the way Einstein did in his 1905 paper, As a “quantum of energy”. (Isaac Asimov credits Arthur Compton with defining "quanta of energy" as photons in 1923.). The so-called photon is simply that. Energy is transmitted in pulses and physicists read it as particles. Take the sound, for instance. If it is transmitted intermitently in pulses, like a bip-bip-bip, it does not signify that sound is a "particle".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)