what is a wavicle?

[AntonioLao]

It is not a wave. It is not a particle. It is both a wave and a particle together with their respective intrinsic properties of wavelength, frequency, linear and angular momentum. In addition a wavicle has intrinsic double spins. Both spins can singularly be described by a conserved mass independent local infinitesimal angular acceleration such that the scalar inner dot product of this acceleration and the local infinitesimal metric is a constant the square of light speed in vacuum. If now a unit of inertial mass is defined then, as inertial mass dependence description, the product of unit mass and c is the same as Einstein’s mass and energy equivalence E=mc and the local infinitesimal acceleration is equivalent to the inertial acceleration of Newtonian mechanics with a triple equivalence of inertial mass, rest mass, and gravitational mass.

A wavicle has no physical volume or surface area. Furthermore, each wavicle is composed of two intrinsic local infinitesimal orthogonal primary forces. If one of these primary forces becomes a secondary force then they become attractive and a wavicle then starts acquiring surface area. This dynamic surface could then be used to define approximately a physical volume. Nevertheless the wavicle remains an open system in contradistinction to a closed volume of an isolated system. Since a wavicle is an open system it is perpetually connected at least to one space-time point outside its surface showing a holistic interdependence of all space-time quanta.

[dleviwing]

Antonio;
A very interesting concept. Though I disagree with some of the fundamental aspects of this concept, it does give an excellent visualization of how the EM characteristics relate at the microcosm level. This site gives an explanation in regards to the electron.
http://mypage.direct.ca/c/christie/Wavicle.html

[Guille]

How can the wavicle be an open system if it is dimensionless? And how can it be connected to space-time quanta if it is dimentionless (I mean, shouldn't dimentional particles be connected, and dimensionless disconnected?)

[mkirkpatrick]

To me a wavicle is two opposing vortices spinning in opposite directions,to
each other,this creates a cohesive matrix for in-formation to connect to all
levels of manifestation.the inner higher frequency is mindfulness,the outer
lower frequency is manifest energy informed ripple effect,the wave,rill,wavicle
or whatever else you choose to call it.


kind regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

To me a wavicle is two opposing vortices spinning in opposite directions

this is equivalent to what I have in mind about what a wavicle is. It is composed of H-pluses and H-minuses. These are Hadamard matrices representing square of energy independent of the dimensionality of space and time greater than 8 degrees of freedom.

[Fivedoughnut]

My model of interdimensional wave propagation creates point particle in a succession of dimensional collapse. This zero-space manifestation is a singularity.

A photon exists as an event anti-event loop courtesy of the "Tachyonic" effect of the singularity. A photons frequency is proportional to the magnitude of a auto-dynamically formed " micro black hole".

We're all part of an ever-changing instant. Cool?..no...This garbage is positively cryogenic!

To get a better "picture"...read my Spacial Vacuoles stuff.

[AntonioLao]

My model of interdimensional wave propagation creates point particle in a succession of dimensional collapse.

Thanks. I still could not comprehend your model. However, if you could describe further how waves can propagate through multi-dimensional space-time would be much appreciated.

[Fivedoughnut]

AntonioLao,

Remember your first magnifying glass?...Did you ever enjoy burning holes in paper & wood etc ?

Well if you're still struggling to understand my concepts with regards to energy propagation, the following imperfect analogy may help you over the first stumbling block:

Think of a imaginary, perfect bi-convex lens capable of converting imaginary light from 2-D to 0-D by its ability to converge energy to a single point.....normal light would not achieve this singularity (that's why it's imaginary )

As an analogy to my understanding, the (zero-space) focal point would represent the particle of matter (mass), but only if in nodal intersection with the papers surface (analogous to a slice of our Brane).

Instead of paper, visualize a transparent block, as the light cone passes through this "block", from the lens to the singularity, its energy is transmitted through every point of the cone with increasing magnitude...although with the real gravitational field, instead of a cone this field is spherical as it eminates from 4-D space through our 3-D brane.

However, the singularity before formation, exists as converging energy, rather similar to the gravitational inverse square rule.

The intermediate dimension formed by the light cone between the lens & point particle, is my analogy to time space...i.e the nearer to the focal point (singularity)....the hotter it gets!.....This is how I understand gravity....and now, I hope you do too!.

Realise, this analogous "time-space" can be produced without the formation of the singularity, as it is only required, that any part of the light cone falls within the block (brane)....hence this simple "inaccurate" model, now describes the formation of all additional missing gravity....and not dark matter etc

[AntonioLao]

Remember your first magnifying glass?

That was the same as the principle of laser (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser) light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation which is to say that the principle of superposition (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle) can only apply to bosons but not to fermions.

[Fivedoughnut]

Oh, I give up.....bye!