Consciousness holds the key. to the T.O.E.

[Drifter]

so Michael, what would have been the first consciousness ... of?

Flyby: drop; itSelf.

[G_burnett]

but it does not describe the feature of self that itself became conscious of first Drift

what did we notice first
what did we become of aware of first
what was the first condition of exist we first were conscious of

think in terms of actual physical structure in the beginning of ganglia

[mkirkpatrick]

so Michael, what would have been the first consciousness ... of?

"I AM"??? That would have been the first consciousness of "awareness of Being" a drop of the Ocean of Lifefullness,becoming aware of its "droplet form"as "seemingly apart from the Ocean of Spirit.The dawning of I am consciousness.

Sorry about the delay in replying Graham have been in India for a month and have just got back.

regards michael.

[WHY 137?]

"I AM"??? That would have been the first consciousness of "awareness of Being" a drop of the Ocean of Lifefullness,becoming aware of its "droplet form"as "seemingly apart from the Ocean of Spirit.The dawning of I am consciousness.

Sorry about the delay in replying Graham have been in India for a month and have just got back.

regards michael.

hope you enjoyed India, great vibe eh?
but it explains your tardiness in dealing with 'I AM'

???

Didn't you know that 'I AM' is an anagram for 'MIA' or 'Missing In Action' and that can happen to you when you go to India.
Easy to get lost.

And we have billions of lost souls, 'MIA' trying to become recognized as 'I AM'

namaste

[mkirkpatrick]

hope you enjoyed India, great vibe eh?
but it explains your tardiness in dealing with 'I AM'

???

Didn't you know that 'I AM' is an anagram for 'MIA' or 'Missing In Action' and that can happen to you when you go to India.
Easy to get lost.

And we have billions of lost souls, 'MIA' trying to become recognized as 'I AM'

namaste

Many thanks WHY137,was just of to bed when your reply popped up on my screen,(still recovering from jet lag after 48 hours of flying in from India)

There are indeed many lost souls in this world,I myself was one of them until I recieved a "wake up call from within",we all need to wake up and smell the roses,is that not so?

regards michael.

[mkirkpatrick]

Consciousness,consciousness,all is consciousness,there is ought else in this physical universe,soon this will become universally recognised and accepted as an absolute and relative fact."I" have posted many times about the illusion of "many things" and have constantly referred to there only ever being ONE THING,not things,but thing.Forever it is the singular that is real and the plural false,within this physical universe all is consciousness,that is the reality,when this is openly accepted as it most certainly will be,then we will see with a much clearer vision.

regards michael.

[G_burnett]

i think the first consciousness of a self would have been the recognition of loss or retard of energy flow, a resistance caused by the cellular absorb of foreign matter that collected as a cancer causing agent in the cell itself.

[mkirkpatrick]

i think the first consciousness of a self would have been the recognition of loss or retard of energy flow, a resistance caused by the cellular absorb of foreign matter that collected as a cancer causing agent in the cell itself.

A most intereresting idea Graham,loss of energy (as in a pure uninterupted flow) makes sense,resistence caused by the emergent "I" perhaps? Thanks for your input here.

regards michael.

[melanie]

Consciousness,consciousness,all is consciousness,there is ought else in this physical universe,soon this will become universally recognised and accepted as an absolute and relative fact."I" have posted many times about the illusion of "many things" and have constantly referred to there only ever being ONE THING,not things,but thing.Forever it is the singular that is real and the plural false,within this physical universe all is consciousness,that is the reality,when this is openly accepted as it most certainly will be,then we will see with a much clearer vision.

regards michael.

Michael, you know that not only is there not 'one thing' even the idea of just 'thing' is false too. There cannot be 'thing' for that would need another 'thing' to label it 'thing'

No thing is here, there is no thing at all, not even 'thing' unless conceived, by not some thing, but no thing.

So even the apparent 'thing' that appears to be is not, because 'thing' has been conceived by no 'thing' ..... It's the trickless trick.

[G_burnett]

A most intereresting idea Graham,loss of energy (as in a pure uninterupted flow) makes sense,resistence caused by the emergent "I" perhaps? Thanks for your input here.

regards michael.

emergence of I based on a collective of sort .. foundation +1 +2 +3 ... not necessarily in order but evolution of what works .. consciousness little more then a side effect of resistance to effect by then prediction made .. the amount of prediction made ... the amount of time we would have to make a prediction based on the complexity of the collective .. in the ganglia of foundation purity of state ... we are then but ... well ... garbage the ganglia could not get rid of and had to deal with till a greater disposal system evolution takes place?? All a passing fancy .. kind regards graham