Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 4 of 211 FirstFirst 123456781454104 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 2110
  1. #31
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    The mind is closer to square of energy, E, than matter is closer to energy by Einstein's mass and energy equivalence E=mc. Then again the square of energy is just a quantized configuration of space-time therefore the mind is really equivalent to the quanta of space-time. Since quanta are independent of each other likewise the subjective independence of all minds.
    I see it this way: consciousness is E^2 and sub-consciousness (which includes inconsciousness, perception, intuition, feeling...) is E. So the mind=E+E^2. Does it still match, somehow, with your theory?

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    Relatively, maximum entropy stops the flow of time's arrow.
    Yes, but that is the question: infinite time is equal to zero time. And because maximum time is infinite time as there is no limit (for now, in our science), then time is stopped. I mean,the square of energy is 0 in both cases.

    HG,

    Heat is just a form of KE, but an important one, for it is the 'amplification' of the KE, whiles temperature is like the 'speed' of that KE. It's got to do with this all because there is no potential energy with maximum entropy, due to the fact that it's all used up in time (there more KE the more motion the more time, as time is infinite (and thus 0), the KE is all the energy there is.
    Last edited by dleviwing; 03-14-2006 at 03:46 PM.

  2. #32
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    So the mind=E+E^2
    This looks like the standard form of a quadratic equation or parabolic equation but still there is an arbitrary additive constant and in your case the constant is valued zero.

    Quote Originally Posted by harmonygirl
    if there is a wikipedia page, please feel free to refer me to it!-
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  3. #33
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    This looks like the standard form of a quadratic equation or parabolic equation but still there is an arbitrary additive constant and in your case the constant is valued zero.
    What defines the value of this constant, and what does it represent?

  4. #34
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool clearer...

    thanks guys, I clearly had an incorrect definition of entropy. Guille, I have been wondering if zero is in fact the opposite of infinity. If infinity is a limit on quantification, would zero be one as well, considering negative numbers? I guess I am wondering if there is 'negative time'?
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  5. #35
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by harmonygirl
    thanks guys, I clearly had an incorrect definition of entropy. Guille, I have been wondering if zero is in fact the opposite of infinity. If infinity is a limit on quantification, would zero be one as well, considering negative numbers? I guess I am wondering if there is 'negative time'?
    Zero is totally a limit. But not from positive no negative numbers, just a quantity limit. I mean, -2 is a quantity, just as 2. But infinity and zero are not quantities, they are limit of quantities, nothing can quantify zero or infinity. And as they are no quantities, they cannot be qualities (for one impplies the other), and this means that nothingness and absoluteness don't exist, zero and infinity don't exist, they are limits. And entropy is exaclty the same. Entropy is a limit that tells us that time can be 0, but not negative in quantity. It might go backwards, but it cannot be negative. Just like space, you can go left or right, up or down, forward or upwards... But not out of these, you can't be moving spatially 'negative', just the same with time.

  6. #36
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    local gauge invariance

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    What defines the value of this constant, and what does it represent?
    In advanced physics, this constant is called a local gauge invariance and it is within your power to choose what you want it to be.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  7. #37
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,626
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile how do we un-vary the variables?

    Guille,You asked,what do you mean by energy being slowed down?I suppose
    that one way to explain this,would be this,energy at high frequency is invisible,flows liquid like,energy at a lower frequency,congeals,and sets as matter,although within the visible "form"there is much motion,and atomic inter
    actions,the visible "form" appears stable.
    Antonio,This "dead energy"is it such a spent force,that we can never take a
    loan out on it,that would help balance this equation,and allow us to show that.this theory,that mind,and consciousness hold the key,and hopefully the
    solution to the TOE?
    This question of measurement that occurs,that science needs to verify and
    check,have you any suggestions as to how we may tackle this?
    Is there a way to quantify all the variables,into one central idea!In other
    words,maybe all these "variables" are one of the same Thing! ie,mindful
    consciousness? Thoughts Antonio!

    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  8. #38
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Thoughts
    Quantifying the mind needs a quantum theory of thoughts as quanta of the mind or equivalently space-time quanta of squares of energy. Pure thoughts are squares of energy. These are analogous to the squares modulus of the quantum mechanical wave functions.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  9. #39
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool energy matters...

    thanks Michael, that is actually what I meant. Not just spin or speed or amplitude, but the quantum harmonics. Antonio referred me to wikipedia, and it gave a definition of entropy being energy that cannot be converted to work. I took this to mean that dead energy is energy that exists but we don't know how to access or use.
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  10. #40
    1st degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    253
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 5x in 4 Posts
    Rep Power
    30
    I haven’t read all posts of this thread (only a few starting ones) in order not to fell under the influence of other thoughts and preserve my own originality.
    My approach is too simple, maybe wrong: I like to systematize everything and maximally simplify conclusions. Anyway to solve TOE for everybody is unfeasible idea! I believe, it had been solved infinite number of times before us and all this is scattered in our surrounding universe. All of us should try to solve TOE for himself and then develop the ways of explanation to other people, but can you explain to the dog that 2+2=4? I.e. to understand even a solved TOE the readiness to understand must exist. And we know a lot of examples, when mankind crucified, burnt and tormented great thinkers because it hadn’t been ready to understand these ideas, put forward for the welfare of the same mankind, paradox!!!!!
    I.e. to repeat, the essence of my approach is to find basic, general rules, that’s common for the whole universe (be it atom, or biggest heavenly body) and to find main formulas to explain the behavior of it: a lot of our members are familiar with my theory, that whole universe is unity of two opposite processes and of two opposite phenomena: space and matter; two main states of matter: expended and contracted, but two main states of space – expansion and rarefaction, left and right, up and down, inside and outside, male and female… i.e. nothing, which is separated into two opposite equal phenomena and manifestation of this process is what we see and feel around us…
    But I really don’t obtrude it on anybody, even when I offer to help the mankind against disasters and cataclysms, I see that nobody needs my offer, as well as your offers … Mankind buys what he wants, and all of us believe in what we want to believe…
    So, dear Michael, anyway we all do our best, so let’s proceed with our explanations and that maybe finally lead us to the truth…
    I.e. let’s follow the river in order to get to the see.

    Best regards,
    Merab.

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. What happens after you die?
    By Robert in forum Polls
    Replies: 2296
    Last Post: 05-11-2012, 10:22 PM
  2. Loooking for philosophers
    By Gil in forum General Philosophy
    Replies: 196
    Last Post: 08-28-2009, 01:58 PM
  3. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-04-2008, 08:21 PM
  4. The Origin of Consciousness.
    By socratus in forum Consciousness
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 01-24-2008, 07:50 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top