Relative Charge Dynamics and Monopolar Theory

[KAC]

For now, as i am tired and all who will wish to partisipate in this discussion will need to read up on what I have written regarding this so far, I am simply going to post a link to an existing thread in another forum.

Once I get a reply from another member here, I will know where to pick up. So without further stalling here is my messily contribution to the great archive of human knowledge.

Hypography forums, KickAssClown, RCD and MP-theory.

I wait with baited breath.

-Laughing all the way...
KAC

[mkirkpatrick]

Hope your lungs are strong then matey! In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king?

kind regards michael.

[KAC]

To start with the Concept.

Dirac produced a Quantization for Charge. It required the existence of Monopoles. I believe we have observed, but do not realize we have observed monopoles.

Further I believe, through careful analysis, that mass is not infact a fundemental property. That it is infact the tesult of these monopoles, and that infact all phenomena arises from these two.

Through careful dimensional analysis I have arrived at the conclusion that the Photon is Mass, is Energy. That it is not that the Photon has no mass, but rather that the photon is 1 mass-Energy unit, at it's lowest state.





The Forces Diagram.

• E is Electric
• +B is Magnetic North
• -B is Magnetic South
• S is Strong
• W is Weak
• G is Gravit

I apologize for the Mimetex thingy... I am used to the Hypography forums. With the ability to writ proper mathematical equations.

[dleviwing]

KAC;
Welcome to TOEquest. Though I believe you will eventually realize that the monopole concept is a tail-chasing theory, you will learn much while chasing it. I am quite impressed that you have concluded that mass is not a fundamental property. Do you know what “mass” represents?

[KAC]

That I do. Mass represents an interaction of Eletric Charge (combonation, balanced Monopolar Magnetic Charge) with an Extra unit of Magnetic Charge, that comes to look like what we would call the Strong Force.

I believe we have caught Monopoles and not even known it. I believe that these Monopoles are like Schordinger's Cat. As long as they are un-observed (non-interacting) they have the properties that we would expect, however when they interact with our massed instrumentation then they appear to be something else entirely and have not the properties that we would expect.

The creatures of which we speak, the stones underfoot, while our gaze is fixed on the sky, is the Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino. I believe these odd little particles we have found are infact Monopoles. That we measure a discrepancy in their mass, in an oscillating manner is proof to me that they are the deciding property of mass, such that mass is a function of their combined charge. Further balances or powers of two of these Monopoles result in different frequencies of light, or rather different energy photons.

Such that:
Electric = MagneticNorth/MagneticSouth
Photon = MagneticNorth/MagneticSouth = 1

[dleviwing]

KAC;
As I said, you are in a tail chase. What causes force? – What causes charge? – What causes mass? – What causes magnetic effects? - Etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. You are explaining things with things that have yet to be explained in absolute terms.

Mass is the measure of the uniform motion quantity of the fundamental physical substance of the universe.

All forces are the result of interactions that alter the relationship of motion between physical substance. This includes gravity, strong force, weak force, and magnetic forces.

I think you are a long way from explaining reality in absolute fundamental laws of the universe. Look for the simple and don’t get caught up in the complexity of the terminology and misinterpretations of the mathematical theories.

Other than volume, there are only two fundamental properties of the substance of the universe; bonding and motion. These properties account for all phenomena.

[KAC]

Mass is the measure of the uniform motion quantity of the fundamental physical substance of the universe.

Under my theory this is false. Fundemental Matter is without mass. Without energy also. Energy is with spacial dimensions, mass is also. Monopolar Charge is without spacial dimensions. Energy is with the Charge Dimension. Monopolar imbalance with spacial dimensions is mass, and energy. Monopolar balance With spacial dimesions is energy.
Monopolar Exclusion is without spacial dimension, and is fundmental.

E_m0 = m_0 c^2
c^2 = 1/epsilon_0 mu_0
E_0 = epsilon_0 mu_0/epsilon_0 mu_0 = 1
m0 = c^-2
E_0 = c^2/c^2 = 1

[mkirkpatrick]

KAC.are you actually saying what i think you are saying in this equation!

kind regards michael.

[dleviwing]

KAC;
This link will allow you to do a free download of collage level physics text books.
http://lightandmatter.com/
They will help you with the terminology and comprehension of the topics of physics.

Personally I think we have enough “Clown Physics” now.

[KAC]

Thanks. But I already have a few good references myself.
Perhaps you would like to review them.
Hyper Physics
General Relativity and Special Relativity, Translated by Robert W. Lawson
Wikipedia

And yes I am implying, logically that mass-energy equivilancy is correct, to a point. Mass-Energy is like Positive-Negative Force. Mass-Energy is Invertly related.

In theory, though I am uncertain, as I lack the calculation capabilities. You should be able to re-write the famous E = mc^2 as E = εμ/ε_0 μ_0. I'm still working out the various Force Equations as of now, but I have some sneaking suspicions regarding a few constants.

I had a beautiful book, that all Physicists should have, called the CRC Handbook of Physics and Chemistry Formulae and Properties, 86th Edition. Massive book with everything you need to know about a given thing, physically.

So I am stuck with my only two books I have on hand at the moment, which are:
Physics For Scientist and Engineers With Modern Physics Fourth Edition By Raymond A. Serway
Principles of Quantum Mechanics

I had others, for the past 13-14 years. I got that Physics book when I was 14. I had another before that. I started with conceptual physics way back when I was 6, in 1992. changed up to a college Physics book, can't remember it's name now, when I was 10.

I study dilligently, and with most of my time. Now for some Explination. As I assume that you haven't read what I have on the main body thread. I brought this here at the suggestion of Mrs. Ashley. She said you people could help, I was reluctant because I knew I would simply have to re-establish myself, and I would be ridiculed before I even started. So.

What causes charge?

Important question, Are we talking Electric Charge, or are we talking Magnetic Charge? This is important to understand, as my manipulations, and understanding of physics holds that Electric Charge, like Mass, and Energy are all dependent on Magnetic Charge.

If we are talking classical Charge, or so called "fundamental Charge", well then it is caused by an exact equality of Magnetic Polars.

Such that Electric Charge = Magnetic_north/ Magnetic_south. Or q = q_t/q_f. The Cause of said monopoles, would then be the next big question, I think, and it is not one that I am at this time able to answer better than "magnetic poles happen because magnetic poles happen."

Now, Force? Well for starters, it would appear that their is only one force. as my diagram denotes. Now, on to the next part. Force is distance dependent. Force diminishes with distance. At a rate according to the Inverse Square law, correct?

Well, it should be noted that my monopoles, Catarions (named after the Chessire cat, the Catapillar, and Schrodinger's Cat.) are part of the Fermion Family, and as such are subject to Pauli Exculsion. They obey the Fermi-Dirac statistics. They are massless, more so than even Light. They have a constant velocity, of c.

I can not at this time describe Force in a meaningful mathematical way. However, it's like this: Strong mediates the Subatomic, correct? Gravity the Macroscopic? If all Forces arrise from one force, then what is the point of measuring for "gravity" at the sub-atomic scale? We know what ficticious force mediates that realm. Gravity_Force = Strong_Force at given scale. It's all in the definition. The one force, Uber, as I call it scales. If we have two interacting Catarions, of opposite Chirality, we call this Weak Force. If we have two sets of Interacting Catarions, we call this Strong Force. If we have imbalanced sets of Interacting Catarions, we call this Electromagnetic Force. If we have weakly interacting Electromagnetic strong Forces, we call this Gravity.

I do not have an answer as of this moment as to what their fields are like. I assume they have fields, but This maybe a fallacy so I have to carefully analysis the underlying assumetions.

Here is something to chew on while I stall. If mass is made up of quanta of Magnetic Charge, and likewise energy is made up of Quanta. How then can Mass be used to detect the properties of said Quanta, without Entanglement getting in the way?

Anyway, take it or leave it. Though I will ask that if you are simply going to sit by and tell me it's impossible, that I am chasing my tail, that I am simply wrong, without providing good reason as to why I am wrong, and proofs to back it up, then I am going to ignore you. Also I am going to ask that you kindly step out of my way, I have a theory to develop. I appreciate Constructive Critism, I do not appreciate pessimism for it's own sake.

but God hath chosen the Foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty.

-Universal Circus ID #1/299792458
KAC