T.o.N. (Theory of Nothing)

[RascalPuff]

RP,

Just reading what Austin had said about Yaun being neutral, I think I may have had things backwards. Are the high concentrations of density within the field due to the compression of the field, whereby the matter expanding is from adding to the density of certain areas in the field?

I had originally thought of matter as being finite bits of energy in uniform motion, but I'm not sure if I should consider your reference as having a compressed static center like a type of singularity. Judging from the woofer-type depiction on your site, it appears to be the case if the compression is occuring from all directions.

I guess I'm asking for your thoughts on contraction.

A contracting 4-D space-time continuum may be contemplated as a 3-D entity in a 4-D universe, where the latter becomes as small and dense as the former becomes relatively large and tenuous around it. It may also be considered as 4-D contraction. The microcosmic *'center' source of disturbance may be just as inaccessible and endless as any macrocosmic 'outside' (re: *'black holes').

The Yaun (Thank you, Austin - I'm Euroasian and was unaware of the term) may be considered as the interconnective - action at a distance - bonded (non-concentrated) force separating all undulating charges of electricity (electrons) from each other - pure speculation.

[N0B0DY]

Good explanation, RP. I can wrap my head around comparing what are thought of as relative scales. With regards to the black holes, there are allegedly singularities surrounded by a forward-time gravitational field, a static or timeless horizon, and a surrounding backward-time electromagnetic field.

My arguments are based on putting them all together, and on the carriage of the horizon throughout Zeno's incrementally-infinite scales. The suggestive point B is never reached because infinity is essentially undefinible with regard to sizes or distances, I would try to replace with point B is already reached - point A and point B are the same point.

I have tried to discuss these points a few times, with the infinite, though fine-line, difference between absolute and infinite, but it leads astray into fuzzy explanations. I had thought you might have wanted to jump in, seeing as though you make references to Zeno as well.

I break the normal considerations into three, there's that number again, where the absolute time of the singularity has an instantaneous relationship with the event horizon; then Zeno's infinite time increments between the horizon and the singularity; and finally the finite time, or "real" time, taken to cover the distance relative to velocity.

The causality issue could be related to the relationship of the singularity and horizon, where observable events this side of the horizon are based on Kirchoff's law, beyond which point your microcosmic infinity would be realized forever towards the center or singularity.

It is essentially that mysterious meeting point, I suggest is the source of causality where time stands still. If I'm clear enough, we can think in terms of all scales having a representative "meeting point" that connects the entire universe. I had tried to propose an equation: G=mc2, and someone remarked that that would put the entire universe in a singularity. I think that would be fairly accurate, and would be the whole point entirely.

The above would also pertain to what I had posted to Pat about, regarding the lack of "boundaries" that you refer us to. If you find the time to only comment on this point would be helpful because I'm looking for different ways to better express indivisibilty. The normal scientific explanations lead to confusion, at least for me, and we could try to explain why boundaries appear to be observed when they don't really exist. In other words, the cause for particulate nature, perhaps using Austin's neutral force as the boundary.

[Profpat]

Dear Nobody;

I don't know if anybody can expain and/or connect the abstract to the concrete, or something from nothing if you will.
And you or anyone else wishing to try that quantum leap, God bless. The only way I did it was through a trance.

My thought, on the detectible and non detectible; between subconscious and unconscious, is that it would be relative.

Similar to infrared and ultraviolet for light, or infrasound and ultrasound for sound. We have points that limit us.

There is a theory, at least for light that the wave band may be a continuum, rejoining itself. Maybe that would be our mobius strip.

I do agree we should all work together, as friends.

And so if I offended you, here is a Haiku just for you Nobody:

--------Fantastic and good--------------------------
--------Intelligent and thoughtful----------------------
--------Paradoxical----------------------------------

Best to you my friend,

Pat

[RascalPuff]

Speculative notes:




The characteristic torus structure accompanying an electron or the exemplary earth may be contemplated as two rotating gears manifest in 3 & 4-D space.
From there, one may begin to draw their own conclusions.
The north pole exit of the field swings around its parent system to enter the south pole.
Bisecting the system at the equator leaves you with an expanding system on top and a contracting system on the bottom, conceivable as matter and antimatter (white hole and black hole?), meeting in the middle and generating a contiuous explosion which emerges as a 4-D expanding material system.

A top view presents an expanding system. A bottom view presents a contracting system.
__________________________

Would like to hear some other interpretations of these proposals about the issued system.

(Illustration from Google - Earth electromagnetic field)

Best regards,
- RP

[Profpat]

RP;

Could that Yaun be considered to be as the ether (aether ) ?

[RascalPuff]

RP;

Could that Yaun be considered to be as the ether (aether ) ?

I don't see why not, Prof.

[N0B0DY]

Much obliged, Pat. No offence taken.

Your direction is excellent and relevant to what I was after. The detectible particulate boundary would be relative to that undetectible connecting point.

I agree that explaining the connection is pretty much impossible, but trying to explain it can lead to exhaustion and submission to the universe. Otherwise what is everyone trying to do here?

I think also that connecting everything and nothing, similar to other connections once thought to be different, can lead to a few realizations as well.

Do you have a link to the theory you mentioned? It sounds similar to zero-point energy spectrums that would interest me.

[RascalPuff]

Speculative notes:




The characteristic torus structure accompanying an electron or the exemplary earth may be contemplated as two rotating gears manifest in 3 & 4-D space.
From there, one may begin to draw their own conclusions.
The north pole exit of the field swings around its parent system to enter the south pole.
Bisecting the system at the equator leaves you with an expanding system on top and a contracting system on the bottom, conceivable as matter and antimatter (white hole and black hole?), meeting in the middle and generating a contiuous explosion which emerges as a 4-D expanding material system.

A top view presents an expanding system. A bottom view presents a contracting system.
__________________________

Would like to hear some other interpretations of these proposals about the issued system.

(Illustration from Google - Earth electromagnetic field)

Please excuse the repetition post. I forgot to send the other one to my good friend Prof. Mark Halfon at madprof21@optonline.net.

[N0B0DY]

"Bisecting the system at the equator leaves you with an expanding system on top and a contracting system on the bottom, conceivable as matter and antimatter (white hole and black hole?), meeting in the middle and generating a contiuous explosion which emerges as a 4-D expanding material system."

I think I would agree if the magnetic field were only as depicted, but within the earth the magnetic field continues infinitesimally, doesn't it? Whereby cutting the field at the equator would produce a smaller, though similar, field comparable in scale to the larger if we were to infinitely cut the progressive equators.

[N0B0DY]

"The characteristic torus structure accompanying an electron..."

I haven't thought of that before, but comparing the electron to the magnetic field, could the electron be thought of as entering and exiting the poles of a nucleon?