[atomboy68]

Nothing can escape from the enormous gravitational energy of the black hole, and the only way for an object to escape from the gravitational energy of the black hole is to travel faster than the speed of light, that in effect, go back in time. But if our universe began from the original singularity, then how did it escape from the infinite gravitational energy of the original singularity?
Well, I have a theory on it, and it is a very long theory, so I wrote it down on one of those free websites; www.geocities.com/atomboy68/index.html, and I hope the members of The Theory Of Everything would visit it and let me know what they think of it. My e-mail address is; atomboy68@yahoo.com

[Tesla]

Nothing can escape from the enormous gravitational energy of the black hole, and the only way for an object to escape from the gravitational energy of the black hole is to travel faster than the speed of light, that in effect, go back in time. But if our universe began from the original singularity, then how did it escape from the infinite gravitational energy of the original singularity?

By original singularity you mean the primeval atom, right? In that case the big bang theory states that in the beginning the original singularity/primeval atom actually did expand faster then the speed of light. So would that not in effect allow matter to escape from the clutches of it's own gravity?

Thanks,

Tesla

[mkirkpatrick]

I have looked very briefly at your theory,atomboy,seems to be quite detailed
in places,wiil look further later,to pick up briefly on Tesla question,regard the
singularity and escape from it!Surely the universal laws that we know of
today,are not the same as then?That came a little later did it not!

regards michael.

[Mohan.C]

You say that the universe emerged from a singularity and you say singularity as Nothing. Then who put all the matter in this nothing so that all the matter that we see emerged out of it. Basically singularity is not nothingness. Singularity is a potential. It has negative energy and if anything emerges from it(though it seems impossible to me). It will have positive energy because the something which emerges has a velocity or it has motion. And that motion is specified by the laws of physics(which need to be found). These laws of physics can be found by combining the four fundamental forces as you said.Because we have observed that there are some basic attractive and repulsive forces in nature. Which govern the state of our universe. So if we find all the virtues of this forces. Then we would be able to predict there behaviour and so understand the movements or changes occuring in the universe. And for this reason I believe we are searching for the Grand unified theory.

As for the Theory of Everything the theory is that "necessity causes change" in thought which causes a change in the actions and the life-style. Because it is always our thoughts which manifest as actions. And these actions are driven by necessity because thoughts come because of necessity. I think about the problems of physics because I want to know. This want to drives me to research books or join such discussions.

I may have to tell much more. But now this is enough and If I go on writing who will read such long posts. However I am awaiting your reply and I hope we can continue this discussion. Because your ideas need to be discussed.

Regards,
Mohan

[atomboy68]

Thanks for your thoughts and comments guys, it helps me to see if there are any areas in my theory that which is flawed, whether it is by my lack of understanding of nature or just a simple flaw in logic.

[Aiya-Oba]

Hi Atomboy68:
It seems you have come to the right place.I think
you have enough valuable spectrum of information, that given time, should sire specific contribution to knowledge.
-Aiya-Oba(Poet/Philosopher)
Discoverer:
Nuclear Logic Theory : The central principle of reconciliation of irreconcilables (Nuclear Logic), is the Self-creator and Equator of All in all.

[gautam]

My dear atomboy68,
I read your toe.It happens when you are obssessed with an idea. It has a few thought provoking points, rest is nothing new. I think , the scientists are making great revelations, but in terms of toe they are going in circles.
As suggested by me in my 'mest toe', we have to duly consider the small scale infinity to have further break through. Zero is a mathematical assumption . You can remove something totally to come to zero, you can never reduce anything to zero. And in this, universe we are dealing with expansions and contractions, nothing is allowed to be removed. While reaching to a mathematical point [zero],we jumped the gun .Small scale infinity or you can call it by some better name is the key to find out whether there is really a toe or not.
I have devoted good deal of my life to invent 'small scale infinity'and only after fully covinced of it , I have put forth it to the forum. I would like to further explain this once got the initial reaction.
luv
Gautam

[Tesla]

Why only zero? What about one, two, three, four...all the way down the number line? The decimals that lie between one and two (and all integers) are infinite. Is this what you mean by small scale infinity?

[gautam]

No Telsa I mean something else. You start from anywhere,there is an infinity above it. You agree! Similarly there is a southward infinity. You can divide 1 by any number, till one lesser than infinite, it can never be zero. Subtracting 1 from one 1 is practical mathematics. It is not science. I have better exlpained it with my bangle model in another thread.

[gautam]

Escape where? This is the problem with human thinking. If John escapes from his life [Space] or age[ time] there is no John. Talking John becomes meaningless .We are treating different components of one entity as independent entities.