Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678
Results 71 to 76 of 76

Thread: protheory.com

  1. #71
    Blue Belt
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    126
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    22

    Re: protheory.com

    Quote Originally Posted by N0B0DY View Post
    I think I would opt for the neutral aspect. Even when a neutron decays into a proton and electron, the system is neutral.

    If you agree with me, while simultaneously disagreeing with me, you will ignore me.
    Interesting point Nobody

    I understand what you're saying here I think, I'm sorry my ideas seem so silly with all the three potentials stuff but I'm trying to get better.
    All we need to do is search for falsity.

    www.protheory.com

    www.youtube.com/protheory

  2. #72
    7th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,000
    Thanks Given
    1
    Thanked 13x in 8 Posts
    Rep Power
    34

    Re: protheory.com

    Quote Originally Posted by theunify View Post
    .... TRY STATING IT ALGEBRAICALLY.

    IF IT BREAKS DOWN, YOUR THEORY IS WRONG.
    IF IT IS CONSISTENT AND TRANSLATES TO GEOMETRY IT IS CORRECT.
    IF IT DOESN'T TRANSLATE TO ANY KNOWN ALGEBRAIC SYMBOL IT IS SCIENCE FICTION.
    All mathematics, especially algebra, is dependent on a sliding scale between positive, negative and neutral potentials (+/-/0).

    3x + -8x + 4 (x ^ 3) = 0

    Where X = SOMETHING CAN BE WRONG RIGHT AND NEITHER AT THE SAME TIME.


    You ask to state this Algebraically:


    3x + -8x + 4 (x ^ 3) = 0

    Simplifying
    3x + -8x + 4(x3) = 0

    Combine like terms: 3x + -8x = -5x
    -5x + 4x3 = 0

    Solving
    -5x + 4x3 = 0

    Factor out the Greatest Common Factor (GCF), 'x'.
    x(-5 + 4x2) = 0

    Subproblem 1
    Set the factor 'x' equal to zero and attempt to solve:

    Simplifying
    x = 0

    Solving
    x = 0

    Move all terms containing x to the left, all other terms to the right.

    Simplifying
    x = 0
    Subproblem 2
    Set the factor '(-5 + 4x2)' equal to zero and attempt to solve:

    Simplifying
    -5 + 4x2 = 0

    Solving
    -5 + 4x2 = 0

    Move all terms containing x to the left, all other terms to the right.

    Add '5' to each side of the equation.
    -5 + 5 + 4x2 = 0 + 5

    Combine like terms: -5 + 5 = 0
    0 + 4x2 = 0 + 5
    4x2 = 0 + 5

    Combine like terms: 0 + 5 = 5
    4x2 = 5

    Divide each side by '4'.
    x2 = 1.25

    Simplifying
    x2 = 1.25

    Take the square root of each side:
    x = {-1.118033989, 1.118033989}

    Solution
    x = {0, -1.118033989, 1.118033989}

    The solution is +/-/0 SIMULTANEOUSLY

    I think you owe Pro an apology

  3. #73
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,721
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks Given
    2,400
    Thanked 1,614x in 1,153 Posts
    Rep Power
    67

    Re: protheory.com

    did you have a date with antonio?

    I am rich, good looking and a liar. Which statement is true.

    enjoy graham

  4. #74
    7th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,000
    Thanks Given
    1
    Thanked 13x in 8 Posts
    Rep Power
    34

    Re: protheory.com

    Quote Originally Posted by G_burnett View Post
    did you have a date with antonio?

    I am rich, good looking and a liar. Which statement is true.

    enjoy graham
    A date with Antonio what fun!

    Your statement is Presently Truth Neutral i.e. indeterminate but the TRUTH is you could potentially be a + b +c.

  5. #75
    7th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,000
    Thanks Given
    1
    Thanked 13x in 8 Posts
    Rep Power
    34

    Re: protheory.com

    Quote Originally Posted by dleviwing View Post
    Protheory;
    ... For the most part you are asking the right questions but are providing yourself with the wrong answers.

    So; “are you wrong?” ---- YES.

    David - please See #72 above.

  6. #76
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,721
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks Given
    2,400
    Thanked 1,614x in 1,153 Posts
    Rep Power
    67

    Re: protheory.com

    Quote Originally Posted by Tina View Post
    A date with Antonio what fun!

    Your statement is Presently Truth Neutral i.e. indeterminate but the TRUTH is you could potentially be a + b +c.
    The only true statement would be considered that i am a liar being the other two are value of opinion sets. (a + b) + c.

    If c is true then I am a truth teller which still holds that I can be a liar at times so c is indeed a truth of the statements.

    kind regards g.

 

 
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678

LinkBacks (?)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top