[Stephen]

The Materialist Paradigm is the specification of the Self-constructing process of the Universe. See, http://members.westnet.com.au/paradigm/essay1.pdf

Stephen Mooney

[Stephen]

After surveying the contents of the forums it appears to me unfortunate that no one here has questioned the utility of the abstractionist paradigm that is the present state of establishment physics.

The materialist paradigm of physics, which I’ve tried to bring to your attention, demonstrates that the abstractionist paradigm of physics is second-rate science.

Where the abstractionist paradigm begins with motion, the materialist paradigm specifies the cause of the motion. Where the abstraction paradigm imposes mathematics and measurements upon the process of the Universe, the materialist paradigm specifies the process of the Universe directly.

Time is the arbiter of all things. In time the materialist paradigm will be accepted as the specification of the construction and functioning and evolution of any one thing and everything.

Stephen Mooney

[dleviwing]

Well Stephen, it would appear that you are another victim of ToeQuest’s failed success stories. We now have approximately 7 uneducated geniuses that have solved the TOE. You should learn the academia you are so quick to criticize.

[Stephen]

The logical answer to the mechanism of nuclear fusion has to be pressure because, as I point out in my essay, the materialist paradigm is irrefutable science.

The only logical issue is the appropriate application of the materialist paradigm. Surely, even a professional scientist can understand that the specification of how everything is constructed must be the most fundamental paradigm (and TOE) that is possible.

And, seeing that ou raised the matter of “professional”, what indisputable law of the Universe states that only a professional scientist can develop the ultimate paradigm of science.

With regard to the Noble Prize for developing the materialist paradigm, you can send it to Stephen Mooney, Post Office, Golden Square, Victoria. Australia. 3555

Now, how about we tackle the real cause of global warming.

Stephen

[Stephen]

What is this nonsense about "uneducated". Is this another of your laws of the Universe. Only an "uneducated" person would dare to investiage physics and come to the realisation that it's an abstractionist paradigm does is not truly fundamental and fails to express the true nature of the Universe. Using terms like "uneducated" and "non-professional" is nothing more than a way of trying to avoid dealing with the issues. The issue is whether the abstractionist paradigm or the materiaist paradigm of physics is the most fundamental specification of the process that is the Universe.

PS When can I expect to receive the Noble Prize? I need to the money to pay the rent.
Stephen

[RascalPuff]

You sound right to me, Stephen.
Regards
-RP