It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Theory of Everything > Your TOE Theory
Reload this Page The Grand Unification Theory of Forces..
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
The Grand Unification Theory of Forces..
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Yellow Belt
einstien3k is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 11
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: May 2006
Rep Power: 0
   
Lightbulb The Grand Unification Theory of Forces.. - 12-17-2006, 03:54 PM

Firstly, this theory is not complete, but a near approximation of what actually is there in the universe. But it amazingly not only unify the forces but also explains:-
Formation and structure of atoms.
Electrostatic forces.
Gravitational forces.
Nuclear forces.
Dual nature of light in to one.
Formation of universe.
Black holes.
Big bang.
Stability of universe.

sounds weired but it is explaing about it...

Now consider relativity (I mean special theory of relativity given by Albert Einstein), there is a problem of twin paradox. Scientist explains it by saying that one of them experience acceleration.
Now consider a situation, in the whole universe there are two bodies A and B (Identical in every respect) going away from each other with speed vàc and then came back at same point.
Now A and B be two human identical in every respect initially when they are at same position. After traveling and coming back relativity say that
One of them will be older than other.
(His has been proved by conducting experiment by taking atomic clock on jet planes and them measuring the time measured by ground and jet clock. A difference has been found, which prove that the difference in time exit.)
Which one?
No one finds this answer. Scientist explains it by saying that one of them experience acceleration. The one who feel acceleration and that one get younger.
In experiments there is distinction between bodies, but in my case in whole universe there are two bodies which are identical in every respect there is no distinction between them. So which one will be younger or older?
I explain it by stating the age old principle of ether medium in a new way:-
There exists a photon medium or P-med in vacuum as well as in matter.
Moving thorough P-med changes properties of matter.
This P-med is nothing but Black Matter as thought by the scientists.
P-med consists of pn which them selves consist of p- and p+.

This pn, p+, p- combines to form all fundamental particles.
FORMATION SOME FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES:-
Electrons: - They consist of p- (a lot) and a few pn surrounding by p+ by density law 1. Outside it density of pn is constant.
(
Density law 1(DL!):- It states that density from a centre point decreases at the rate of 1/r where r is distance from center
)

Protons: - They consist of p+ (equivalent in amount to that of p- in electron) and pn and surrounded by a cloud of p- by density law 1 and pn also by density law 1.

Neutron: - They consist of pn (some what less than pn of proton) surrounded by pn by DL1.

For Stability
p+ or p- density should be decreased.
pn should be loosed.(pn represent energy)



Electrostatic forces:-
Now as told that electron is surrounded by p+, so when two electrons move closer p+ density increases which is against stability law stated above. Therefore the two electrons repel to decrease the p+ density or to increase the stability in other words.
Therefore same charges repel.
Now when electron and proton move closer their p+ and p- cloud interact with each other and form pn. Now in this case stability is increased because of decreasing density of p- and p+.
Therefore opposite charges attract.
Also the p- and p+ density follow DL1. Therefore their attraction law follows inverse square law.

Nuclear Forces:-
In nucleus protons are so close that there is no p- cloud between rather they share a common p- cloud so to loose some to interact with outer p+ of electron.
Therefore there is almost no repelling between protons in nucleus.
There are attractive forces because protons and neutrons are also surrounded by pn, so when they came closer, they share their pn and lose some pn. Also by stability law pn should be lost.
Therefore proton and neutrons in the nucleus attract.

Formation of Atoms:-
Now when protons and neutrons came closer (that too by a great force), they share pn cloud and loose some pn to increase stability. Also they loose some p- due sharing of p- between protons.
These p- interact with p+ of electrons revolving in particular orbital. P- and p+ combine and form pn which surrounds the atom with DL1.
Therefore in atoms there are very few p- and p+.

Gravitational Forces:-
As by above topic you know that an atom is surrounded by pn by DL1. Therefore when two atoms came closer they share some of their pn and lose the others, thus increasing the stability.
Therefore two atoms or we may say masses attract each other and also by inverse square law (which is because of DL1).
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: The Grand Unification Theory of Forces..
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,254
Thanks Given: 337
Thanked 643x in 614 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 91
   
Smile Re: The Grand Unification Theory of Forces.. - 12-17-2006, 06:54 PM

Great thread starter Rahul,detailed yet concise.

regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: The Grand Unification Theory of Forces..
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nice
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,748
Thanks Given: 15
Thanked 139x in 117 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 33
   
Re: The Grand Unification Theory of Forces.. - 12-17-2006, 07:25 PM

Rahul;
Density is also a function of the “Inverse Square Law”. Your concepts are very easily refuted with any good physics text. Don’t give up though, just do more study and research your work carefully.


David
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: The Grand Unification Theory of Forces..
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
2nd degree Black Belt
theunify is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 324
Thanks Given: 24
Thanked 8x in 8 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rep Power: 10
   
Lightbulb Re: The Grand Unification Theory of Forces.. - 12-18-2006, 06:27 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing View Post
Rahul;
Density is also a function of the “Inverse Square Law”. Your concepts are very easily refuted with any good physics text. Don’t give up though, just do more study and research your work carefully.
I agree with David on this one again, this is much better than some of the theories that have been presented just in the last week. If this theory holds to be true, then for P=1, 1 should contain an equality for all functions of P, however how do you resolve this since clearly we cannot imagine P=1; when P clearly is fractional depending on the scale of the force involved.

Little over your head, but nice work, a good starter recipe for some of the mainstream scientists who insists on saying "dark Matter" over and over again.

Last edited by theunify : 12-18-2006 at 06:27 AM. Reason: Forgot an icon, Light bulb.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An Intro to what Supertrings are james l. digol String Theory 29 07-03-2008 02:07 PM
Philosphical TOE (draft notes) Jamesh Your TOE Theory 12 01-31-2007 06:27 PM
A Real Theory of Everything Tesla TOE Theories 15 01-11-2007 05:35 AM
The Mathematico-Cognition Reality Theory (MCRT) mjgeddes TOE Theory Articles 11 02-10-2006 09:08 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com