Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 | hole argument spacetime quantum -
02-28-2005, 12:21 PM
when Einstein formulated his general relativity, he surpassed the hole argument in order to make his field equations general covariance. A modern theory uses gauge freedom for an invariance of spacetime quantization. This gauge freedom is the same as a principle of directional invariance at the local region of spacetime.
If there are two distinct topologies of spacetime, then physical space both contains the evenness and oddness of these topologies. Matter field structure is formed by just the oddness of these topologies and energy field structure is formed only by the evenness of these topologies.
In one dimensional spacetime, the Lorentz invariance is given by
where  is the fundamental acceleration and  is the one dimensional metric and c is the speed of light in "empty space" or the true vacuum. | |
| | | | | | Yellow Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 11
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2005 Rep Power: 0 | Einstein's last words -
10-11-2005, 06:19 PM
Einstein's last words\; Everything is relative. This by the way, is very contrary to his theory! Before his death, Einstein was witness to the Philadelphia Experiment; where a navy ship disappeared in front of many witnesses bare eyeballs right next to the pier.
I have in fact uncovered the general rules regarding relative spaces. Each element carries it's own time, it's own space, and even space itself without matter can exist, atleast for short timespans, to imitate the presence of matter such as witnessed in supersymmetry. This is because all matter is surrounded with Bosons, and depending on what element you have, the number of bosons and types varies about it. Likewise, ionization- otherwise known in one case as a positron, may vary in density, usually by spiinning sets of large bosons to force a lacking of smaller free particles within the center of rotation. The experiment which proves the existence of the positron is merely proving the existence of an opposite reaction to electron movement. Too bad atom smashers cannot do such a great job of viewing larger particles, else things would be much different now. Kinetic pressure in space easily replaces the need for string tension or photons. 'Quanta' are really spin waves lacking smaller particles- or specifically sized particles in some local cases- Such spin waves are larger particles grouped in spins (of the group). Has this helped? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 |
10-11-2005, 06:54 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by infinitymike Has this helped? | Can you help me make the expression  Lorentz invariant? Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | uss Eldridge 1943 unified field theory,Inexactidude? -
10-11-2005, 06:58 PM
Infinity mike,
I wouldbe most grateful to you if you could send me some details of where I can
acquire some information about the Philadelphia experiment,I have been researching this event for the past 30 years and have read all the naval papers
that have been made available,and just cannot seem to go any futher,I have tried to find evidence for Enstein ever being there,but couldnot find onescrap
of evidence ,please if you have access to any more information about this I
would indeed be most grateful to you,heaven knows I have tried hard enough
over these past 30 years.
kind regards michael. | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 |
10-11-2005, 08:29 PM
The following site might shed some light about the Philadelphia Experiment. http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq21-1.htm Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Yellow Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 11
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2005 Rep Power: 0 | plainnnn stoopid -
10-12-2005, 04:12 PM
And I suppose you beleive this article on the Eldridge's reported position? God I hope not. Should I guess you're posting this articles adress because you accept it or are you genuinely curious? If not I would say to the pecimist;
Never mind the fact that dozens of people witnessed it. Never mind that one of the scientists involved wrote a book about it. Sure, they all just made it up and we should all trust the government. And I am a cow. herd me. duhhh
Last edited by infinitymike : 10-12-2005 at 04:34 PM.
Reason: lack of brainpower
| |
| | | | | | Yellow Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 11
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2005 Rep Power: 0 | Phil. Exp. -
10-12-2005, 04:31 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Infinity mike,
I wouldbe most grateful to you if you could send me some details of where I can
acquire some information about the Philadelphia experiment,I have been researching this event for the past 30 years and have read all the naval papers
that have been made available,and just cannot seem to go any futher,I have tried to find evidence for Enstein ever being there,but couldnot find onescrap
of evidence ,please if you have access to any more information about this I
would indeed be most grateful to you,heaven knows I have tried hard enough
over these past 30 years.
kind regards michael. | I had a book on the Philadelphia Experiment as witnessed by one who I vaguely recall as being a scientist. He lived in Philadelphia with no telephone, and wrote the book as he was very old and is probably dead by now. I'll do some digging to find out if it's still in print. It was a paperbound small book ,black w/some blue picture on the front cover. In part of the movie which I don't know once again anything about it's references(sorry) the guy destroyed quite a few radio tubes to shut down the device. In the book, the ship supposedly ended up in the waters near France.
In any case, you can replicate the experiment yourself quite easily. Just take 3 866 mercury vapor rectifiers, place in traingular formation about 2" apart each. Power each to spec , about 1000v at 500ma (500w load) w/main transformers individually. Now run in paralell the smaller suggested amps, used to send voice and oscillations on each. Instead of hooking it up to a microphone, hook each of the 3 up to a frequency generator pumping out z waves (not sawtooth). Pump z waves of induction will charge the 866 rectifier tubes with ionization, which normally is lost, but when placing the 3 in triangular formation, positrons jump from one to the next, and soon you have a rotating lightning bolt, ie; a positron field, otherwise known as a 'format 7 boson field of superheavy ions'. It will probably work best in an environment where there is moisture in the air. Can't be sure about that. So now you have this field. place a large iron rod in the center of the 3 tubes rotations , vary the z wave frequency from 50 hz to 5000hz to see how well your tubes work with the particular rod. The rod is ready to attach to metal 'antennae' which enemate hv dc away from the device, but rig up some of the current ( and you must measure it to get it right) to actually run the transformers and the frequency generator. Given the right platform, you should find a layer of h20 suspending just outside the antennae range. Be certain to perform this experiment using timers at a distance, and use radiation detectors, as the positron field can be tuned up to emit dangerous gamma rays. Gold leaf from the paint store can be used to deflect radiation. | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | 
02-25-2006, 06:50 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by infinitymike I had a book on the Philadelphia Experiment as witnessed by one who I vaguely recall as being a scientist. He lived in Philadelphia with no telephone, and wrote the book as he was very old and is probably dead by now. I'll do some digging to find out if it's still in print. It was a paperbound small book ,black w/some blue picture on the front cover. In part of the movie which I don't know once again anything about it's references(sorry) the guy destroyed quite a few radio tubes to shut down the device. In the book, the ship supposedly ended up in the waters near France.
In any case, you can replicate the experiment yourself quite easily. Just take 3 866 mercury vapor rectifiers, place in traingular formation about 2" apart each. Power each to spec , about 1000v at 500ma (500w load) w/main transformers individually. Now run in paralell the smaller suggested amps, used to send voice and oscillations on each. Instead of hooking it up to a microphone, hook each of the 3 up to a frequency generator pumping out z waves (not sawtooth). Pump z waves of induction will charge the 866 rectifier tubes with ionization, which normally is lost, but when placing the 3 in triangular formation, positrons jump from one to the next, and soon you have a rotating lightning bolt, ie; a positron field, otherwise known as a 'format 7 boson field of superheavy ions'. It will probably work best in an environment where there is moisture in the air. Can't be sure about that. So now you have this field. place a large iron rod in the center of the 3 tubes rotations , vary the z wave frequency from 50 hz to 5000hz to see how well your tubes work with the particular rod. The rod is ready to attach to metal 'antennae' which enemate hv dc away from the device, but rig up some of the current ( and you must measure it to get it right) to actually run the transformers and the frequency generator. Given the right platform, you should find a layer of h20 suspending just outside the antennae range. Be certain to perform this experiment using timers at a distance, and use radiation detectors, as the positron field can be tuned up to emit dangerous gamma rays. Gold leaf from the paint store can be used to deflect radiation. | I knowthat muchhas passed since this post was last seen,But infinitymike,youare surely taking the
urine,are you not,if you are serious,then prehaps i can find a bed for you in
the local funnyfarm!!
best wishes michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com | |