Noone believes me

[adamgf]

After making a bunch of money in the computer industry and having some crazy ideas about black holes and anti-matter, I decided to take some time off and pursue solving for these crazy ideas for the physics I had taken when I was at UCLA that I had mostly forgotten. I got back into quantum mechanics and relativity and the wheels kept turning and turning.

Here it is, the Theory of Everything:::: anti-matter and black holes have an intrinsic negative spacetime curvature, have a hyperbolic and pseudo-spherical geometry, have an imaginary radius ir, exist in a spacelike Minkowski spacetime, have negative energy, move backwards in time and ''they compress spacetime.'' Think about something really, really simple that illustrates this. Take the time-independent Schrodinger equation. Positive energy solutions of this equation are sinusoidal. Negative energy solutions of this equation are hyperbolic. Pseudo-spheres are hyperbolic. Plane waveform solutions to the Dirac equation for negative energy are hyperbolic and pseudo-spherical. What has negative energy? The positron. What has an imaginary radius for imaginary axes in space? The pseudo-sphere. It is all so obvious when you think about it, I do not understand why I am being shot down. Noone wants to publish my paper. If I am wrong, tell me how I am wrong because I do not see it. Anyways, this theory unifies quantum gravity and relativity and takes away the mystery of the black hole. Also, it explains anti-matter. Anti-matter is just a different state of matter. Matter moving forwards in time **IS** anti-matter moving backwards in time. The two are equivalent!! This is all elicited from these theories (and the Dirac equation.)

[theunify]

Your not wrong. You are right. But where is your creativity, people have said these things before, and will say them again, it doesn't show any effort simply to use your 'stream of conscience' to prove to us you have a wide vocabulary and can connect concepts logically. Any child can do that effortlessly. Do you have any sketches?

[mkirkpatrick]

After making a bunch of money in the computer industry and having some crazy ideas about black holes and anti-matter, I decided to take some time off and pursue solving for these crazy ideas for the physics I had taken when I was at UCLA that I had mostly forgotten. I got back into quantum mechanics and relativity and the wheels kept turning and turning.

Here it is, the Theory of Everything:::: anti-matter and black holes have an intrinsic negative spacetime curvature, have a hyperbolic and pseudo-spherical geometry, have an imaginary radius ir, exist in a spacelike Minkowski spacetime, have negative energy, move backwards in time and ''they compress spacetime.'' Think about something really, really simple that illustrates this. Take the time-independent Schrodinger equation. Positive energy solutions of this equation are sinusoidal. Negative energy solutions of this equation are hyperbolic. Pseudo-spheres are hyperbolic. Plane waveform solutions to the Dirac equation for negative energy are hyperbolic and pseudo-spherical. What has negative energy? The positron. What has an imaginary radius for imaginary axes in space? The pseudo-sphere. It is all so obvious when you think about it, I do not understand why I am being shot down. Noone wants to publish my paper. If I am wrong, tell me how I am wrong because I do not see it. Anyways, this theory unifies quantum gravity and relativity and takes away the mystery of the black hole. Also, it explains anti-matter. Anti-matter is just a different state of matter. Matter moving forwards in time **IS** anti-matter moving backwards in time. The two are equivalent!! This is all elicited from these theories (and the Dirac equation.)

Welcome to the forum adamgf,have not seen your theory so I cannot comment,prehaps
you will do that later?

regards michael.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Hi Adamgf, and welcome to ToeQuest. You ask why nobody believes you, and may I point out the laws of abstract mathematics agree with you, but the laws of physics/thermodynamics disagree with you and the mathematics. Which is real, the math or the physical world...? You must apply real physical substance to your ideas, and see which ones are true, and which ones are false. I know, iff thoroughly done, you will find the physical world and universe tells the truth, not the metaphysical interpretations of guage theories... Anti-matter is only a product of guage theories and mind, real substance is all there is...

Regards,
Lloyd

After making a bunch of money in the computer industry and having some crazy ideas about black holes and anti-matter, I decided to take some time off and pursue solving for these crazy ideas for the physics I had taken when I was at UCLA that I had mostly forgotten. I got back into quantum mechanics and relativity and the wheels kept turning and turning.

Here it is, the Theory of Everything:::: anti-matter and black holes have an intrinsic negative spacetime curvature, have a hyperbolic and pseudo-spherical geometry, have an imaginary radius ir, exist in a spacelike Minkowski spacetime, have negative energy, move backwards in time and ''they compress spacetime.'' Think about something really, really simple that illustrates this. Take the time-independent Schrodinger equation. Positive energy solutions of this equation are sinusoidal. Negative energy solutions of this equation are hyperbolic. Pseudo-spheres are hyperbolic. Plane waveform solutions to the Dirac equation for negative energy are hyperbolic and pseudo-spherical. What has negative energy? The positron. What has an imaginary radius for imaginary axes in space? The pseudo-sphere. It is all so obvious when you think about it, I do not understand why I am being shot down. Noone wants to publish my paper. If I am wrong, tell me how I am wrong because I do not see it. Anyways, this theory unifies quantum gravity and relativity and takes away the mystery of the black hole. Also, it explains anti-matter. Anti-matter is just a different state of matter. Matter moving forwards in time **IS** anti-matter moving backwards in time. The two are equivalent!! This is all elicited from these theories (and the Dirac equation.)

[adamgf]

Hello everyone!

After some responses, I decided to put a paper up online that goes into more mathematical and physics detail and has a number of figures that illustrate the theory of compressed spacetime for anti-matter and black holes. Please read the paper and let me know what you think. Let me know how I can improve it or if something is vague or if I contradict myself or something in physics.

Here is the paper::::
http://alumni.cse.ucsc.edu/~adam/antibh.pdf

Let me know if you have any other issues as well.

Thank you all of you for your input and your sincerity,
Adam Gottlieb Freeman

[theunify]

I won't quote you but I see the intention of your work, you have to realize your going about things backward and creating much more work than anybody is going to put up with. By calling anti-particles particles you reveal you have not given the least bit of thought to what constitutes a particle, by defining an anti-particle's transformation depending on the fraction of C reveals you do not understand the invariable nature of C and hence the invariable nature of the "anti-particle", by defining it as having negative energy you violate the idea that the Universe does exist, check out this link and tell me what you think about the idea of binary logic creation, do you understand after watching this that in the binary system negative integers are meaningless?

http://digg.com/general_sciences/Wor...est_IQ_190_210

[adamgf]

The Dirac equation says that the anti-particle is the particle (refer to my first post.) One equation, the relativistic Dirac equation, describes four plane waveform solutions for one 'element.' Two of these plane waveform solutions of the form i(kx-wt) and i(-kx-wt) are for a positive energy solution for the electron. The other two of these plane waveform solutions of the form i(kx+wt) and i(-kx+wt) are for a negative energy solution for the positron. Look at the Dirac equation and plug in these plane waveform solutions and you will see that this is true. Also, the positron plane waveform solutions produce negative energy for the time-independent Schrodinger equation if and only if they are hyperbolic. They are hyperbolic if the imaginary number is removed from the superscript of the exponential part of the plane waveform solution.

This suggests that they are pseudo-spherical as well and from David Hestenes' spacetime algebra solution for the real Dirac equation using geometric algebra, this is elicited from the term (iR) in the plane waveform solution for the positron. Please refer to David Hestenes' seminal paper 'Mysteries and Insights into the Dirac Equation.' Pseudo-spheres have an imaginary radius for real axes or a real radius for imaginary axes.

In my paper referred to in the previous post, the Unexpected Lorentz Transformation reveals a negative Lorentz factor which relates to negative energy. Note that the derivation relates to the plane waveform solutions for the positron in the Dirac equation.
-x+ct and x+ct are used in the derivation which relates to the waveforms i(kx + wt) and i(-kx+wt). From special relativity, there is nothing prohibiting light waves from propagating backwards in time. Proper time for light waves is zero. From a timelike perspective, light waves appear to propagate forwards in time. From a spacelike perspective, light waves appear to propagate backwards in time.

Matter is spherical and has positive curvature. Anti-matter is pseudo-spherical and has negative curvature. The mathematics and physics is all there as I have just described. I am not saying anything that is outlandish. The real Dirac equation, special relativity, the Lorentz transformation and the time-independent Schrodinger equation all reveal this. Consider too spacelike Minkowski spacetime. Just as timelike Minkowski spacetime has three real space axes and an imaginary time axis, spacelike Minkowski spacetime has three imaginary space axes and a real time axis. From geometric algebra, there are three imaginary space axes and a real time axis as the basis set for the spacetime that have not as yet been given a physical description. The physical description is a spacelike Minkowski spacetime. {x,y,z,it} is orthogonal to {ix,iy,iz,t}. ix and iy and iz describe a pseudo-sphere. real t means forwards in time. imaginary t means backwards in time. Feynman said this as well (that positrons and anti-particles move backwards in time.)

[adamgf]

The point of establishing Lorentz covariance in my paper is to show that the postulates of special relativity are not violated for a spacelike Minkowski spacetime. That is the speed of light c is the same for all inertial frames of reference.

[theunify]

The point of establishing Lorentz covariance in my paper is to show that the postulates of special relativity are not violated for a spacelike Minkowski spacetime. That is the speed of light c is the same for all inertial frames of reference.

That is exactly my point, nothing you have said strikes me as new; sure we can argue about what is the best mathematical approach to represent antimatter, I do not think simply saying "psuedo sphere" or "negative curvature" really implies meanings beyond shrodinger's make believe world of formlessness. In essence you are not describing reality with your equations, bringing on serious long term questions of "schizophrenia", is this what you want foryouself? I do not think so, so next time you post something and you disregard completely the reservations I am making you do so at the risk of your own sanity.

Simply put a sphere with negative curvature in space-time is simply a cube with a sphere cut out of the middle of it so that the sphere has 4 points on the surface of this box. is that what you mean by ixc? or -ixc? IF you answer yes than a simple lorentzian transformation is insufficient proof that this box-sphere shape does indeed "travel" and if you do not define the non-continuous motions of matter, then your equations for anti-matter are just a clever rip off of current "relative" continuous theories.

You should be sorry, you are light years away from knowing why brush strokes of math are unneccasary unless new fundemental concepts go along with it.