[Profpat]

Hi Tina:

I agree that protheory is a good theory, just a bit vague. As I remember it he believed everything was positive, negative, or neutral simultaneously. I have no problem with that but I thought we knew that for some time now. ( i.e. proton + electron - neutron o ) But what is new and what does that tell you.

It would be like me telling you that you are made up of protons, electrons, and neutrons simultaneously, which I think is correct, but a given.

Best to you and him,

Pat

[Tina]

Originally Posted by Profpat

Hi Tina:

.... just a bit vague. As I remember it he believed everything was positive, negative, or neutral simultaneously... but But what is new and what does that tell you.

It would be like me telling you that you are made up of protons, electrons, and neutrons simultaneously, which I think is correct, but a given.

Best to you and him,

Pat

Hi Prof

The big confusion of Protheory results from Simon's 'ambiguous' use of the word SIMULTANEOUSLY.

The DYNAMIC between positive negative and neutral is everpresent - the potentials are everpresent - so one potential may be realised at any given time It is misunderstanding to think that all the potentials are realised at the same time.

eg. "Your avatar is Profpat" the other potentials still exist "simultaneously" but are not REALISED so at this given point of time
"Your avatar is Profpat" is TRUE but should you decide to change your avatar completely to "Genius" then "Your avatar is Profpat" is FALSE .Or you can MODIFY Avatar to "Patprof" which is the neutral of the TRUE and FALSE potentials.

What is new about PROTHERY is identifying this dynamic that drives and informs everything...

[Profpat]

Great Tina;

Now I'm not sure who I am anymore. One thing for sure it would not be "Genius" more like "Idiot"
as in Fyodor Dostoevsky's IDIOT ( Really a great book ).

Well best to you Tina,

Pat

[Tina]

Originally Posted by Profpat

Great Tina;

... One thing for sure it would not be "Genius" more like "Idiot"
as in Fyodor Dostoevsky's IDIOT ( Really a great book ).

Well best to you Tina,

Pat

Just read your post - so to reply I logged in User Name but inadvertedly entered IDIOT (hahahah)

That's your fault you Dostoevskian IDIOT