[Aireal]

Having, at long last, finished my first draft of my theory, I discovered that it was too long to post on the forum.

I had cut it down as far as I could, still will not fit.

So I had to start a blog, my first.

I would ask that the other members of the forum read about my theory on my member blog, and post comments here.

My first try at creating a TOE, let me know how I did.

Boy, thats several firsts for me.

Charles

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by Aireal Having, at long last, finished my first draft of my theory, I discovered that it was too long to post on the forum. I had cut it down as far as I could, still will not fit. So I had to start a blog, my first. I would ask that the other members of the forum read about my theory on my member blog, and post comments here. My first try at creating a TOE, let me know how I did. Boy, thats several firsts for me. Charles

Many thanks Charles,will look through your ideas forthwith,keep on posting.

regards michael.

[Aireal]

Mkirkpatrick

Nice to speak with you again.

Yes this is my first try at my own theory, my first draft of that theory, and my first use of a blog.

When we last spoke, it was on a thread about my model of the atom. You will find it as part of my theory, but at the time I was helping two friends who had similar theories that it would fit into also.

Over time I saw what I felt was flaws in their theories, and decided to make my own. I still help out on their sites, etc., but I do not push my ideas on their space. Only fair. They did a lot of work on their sites.

Charles

[Aireal]

Now I can not fit my paper in a single block on my blog. Nor can I upload any of my files as they are to large.

As soon as I can find a site where I can post my complete work, I will let everyone know where to find it.

This is aggravating, can't even post your complete paper anywhere.

I have submitted it for peer review and publication at several places, hopefully I will hear from one of them soon.

[theunify]

You can post articles of great length if you check out Member Articles, but then again, I must warn you not to waste our time with promises.

[Aireal]

Theunify

I will look into the member articles. But to be honest, I have become disillusioned with forums.

I have been working on this for almost two years now and used a number of forums to test my concepts. In that time I received very little feedback, and almost none of it was helpful. In fact the only helpful responses I did receive was on a forum not related to science at all. I was just mentioning a few things to a friend on that forum, and got answers to questions I been asking about for months on science forums with no replies.

I would be a lot farther in my research if I had not wasted so much time on forums.

Little Feather

[Aireal]

My paper was accepted at http://www.wbabin.net/physics/laster.pdf but my pdf is not wanting to load in my browser. If its not one thing it is another. Fun Fun Fun

[Profpat]

LITTLE FEATHER;

I accessed your paper and its excellent. Congratulations on getting it accepted. Is that a peer review site?

While I haven't had time to peruse your paper, what I did read ( and understood ) I agree with.

I have to admit some of it is too technical for an old accountant like me, but it does make sense.

Now can you put that theory of yours on a T shirt?

Good luck to you,

Pat

[Aireal]

Profpat

Thank you very much for those kind comments.

www.wbabin.net is not a mainstream peer review site, but they do require submissions to be scientifically sound. They also do not accept papers that support the mainstream views. I have applied several other places also. I would like to get in a mainstream peer review, but that is unlikely.

I had an early version almost anyone could understand as it was basic wave theory. It was my test paper on forums. For a more professional paper I had to tie it with quantum theory also. That's why the version you read is more technical. Still, I did not try to go any deeper into the math than I had to.
I am no math whiz myself.

For a tee shirt I would go with a mystical approach. "As above so below" Standing wave electron on one side, standing wave universe on the other. Why bore someone with math. If I looked over the WSM forum I would be sure to find many such ideas for tee shirts.

Now there is an idea, marketing. Theories on paper have not been very lucrative.

Charles

[MJA]

S.W.A.P. Theory: Implications of a relativistic extended electron model.

Spherical Wave / Particle Theory

Abstract.

S.W.A.P. The General Theory provides a framework that allows various models to be used together in the search for a unified field theory by providing points of reference between them. This allows fields like, Q.M., to use some of their methods outside their normal range, helping in the search for a connection. A classical approach is used whenever possible as this leads to a more intuitive grasp of the model. But with the aid of reference points, it can be viewed from several perspectives at any point.




Hi Charles,

I pasted your abstract of SWAP so that other might see it easier. I hope you don't mind.

I am truly impressed with the complexity of you knowledge, paper, and work, WOW!

But I must also confess, that because of it's complexity, I do not understand. DAH!

Perhaps you could help me understand your work through the process of simplification,
by simply answering this question:

The forces between particles, as you see it, can be unified to a single field, called GUT, or TOE; and that field is?

Thanks,
Some of us need more help than others.

=
MJA