[Brent]

Inertia

Inertia is resisatance to the acceleration of matter relative to space.
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

When I apply a force to matter (a mass) an equal and opposite force is induced on this mass. The time lag between the applied force and the induced force is dependent on the masses velocity relative to space.

Inertia and gravity are the same thing but happen in the opposite way. Acceleration of space reltive to matter causes gravity and the acceleration of matter relative to space causes inertia.

If space is a volume of charges, a flow of these charges would be electricity. So what we have for inertia and gravity is a simple electric circuit, where space is the electricity and matter is an inductor.

Lets consider an electrical cicuit and then an equivalent physical cicuit.

The electrical circuit would be an inductor made of a super conductor with no resistance. The inductor is of such a diameter to only allow one electron at a time to pass. If a force (voltage) is applied to the circuit current will begin to accelerate the rate of acceleration will fall until the velocity of the charges reaches C at which time the opposing force is induced at the same time as the applied force and the acceleration of charges stops. The total current is limited by the size of the inductor and the speed of light. The rate of acceleration depends on the size of the inductor and the magnitude of the applied force.

The physical circuit of inertia would be a mass in free space. If a force is applied to the mass the mass will begin to accelerate relative to space. The rate of acceleration will fall until the velocity of the mass reaches C relative to space and the induced force happens at the same time as the applied force. The total current for the cicuit is limited by the size
of the mass and the speed of light. The rate of acceleration depends on the size of the mass and the magnitude of the applied force.

At C relative to space, space behaves like a solid. No matter how hard you push an equal and opposite force is created, so your are pushing against yourself.

[dleviwing]

If what you say were true Brent, every motor, transformer, and electric bulb would produce more gravity than the earth itself rather than producing magnetic fields. Maybe you think magnetic fields are the same thing as gravity!

You are not even half right with your explanation of gravity; charge has nothing to do with it. Yes, I do know that because moving charges will NOT produce gravity.

[bottomlander]

Originally Posted by dleviwing I do know that because moving charges will NOT produce gravity.

Perhaps Brent does not take charges at the level of electrons and ions. He handles more fundamental levels.

Just like many people take energy as the ultimate building material of our physical world, Brent takes charge as the building material. If so, surely produce a gravity effect, at a reasonable strength.

Brent thinks like Maxwell, a great mind. It seems that Maxwell worked on a TOE and really achieved something.

Best Regards. Bottomlander

[Brent]

Originally Posted by dleviwing If what you say were true Brent, every motor, transformer, and electric bulb would produce more gravity than the earth itself rather than producing magnetic fields. Maybe you think magnetic fields are the same thing as gravity! You are not even half right with your explanation of gravity; charge has nothing to do with it. Yes, I do know that because moving charges will NOT produce gravity.

Why do you think, motors etc would cause gravity? I do not think that magnetic fields are the same thing as gravity. I said that acceleration of matter relative to space causes gravity. I also said that space is a volume of small charges. a movement of charges is electricity. These charges flow into the neutral volumes. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Acceleration relative to the charge that flows produces an equal and opposite force when the charge is ejected. This force is what causes gravity and inertia.

You are talking about movement of chargers through matter producing a magnetic field. I have not got there yet.

[Brent]

Originally Posted by bottomlander Perhaps Brent does not take charges at the level of electrons and ions. He handles more fundamental levels. Just like many people take energy as the ultimate building material of our physical world, Brent takes charge as the building material. If so, surely produce a gravity effect, at a reasonable strength. Brent thinks like Maxwell, a great mind. It seems that Maxwell worked on a TOE and really achieved something. Best Regards. Bottomlander

Read my reply to deleviwing.

As I said before if you get it and don't like it that is fine. But by your post it appears you did not follow what I was trying to say.

[Brent]

Graybeard,

a small volume would become neutral if to equal and opposite charges tried to occupy the same volume at the same time.

The movement of charge results in the neutral volume becoming positive because protons are positive. If protons really are positive and I am correct then the movement of charge to the neutral volume must produce a positive charge. But if we take a closer look, electric charges should flow from negative to positive. If the neutral volume interacts with a positive volume negative charge should move from the neutral to the positive. In the case of a neutral and a negative volume, negative charge should move from negative to neutral. In both cases this must produce a positive charge.

If I look at it from a logical view, lets consider the earth as one big lump of matter. If I connect a DC generator, the positive terminal through a load and then connected to a ground and the negative terminal connected to a seperate ground a distance away. Negative charges will move from the ground through the load the positive terminal, out the negative terminal and back to the ground. Matter seems to accept and give up negative charges with equal ability.

The difference between the propogation of light and matter is that since the neutral volume is not moving at C, the charge that moves into the neutral volume does not induce a charge with direction but instead induces a negative charge in the volumes surrounding the positve volume.
This is the same as the inital explaination. Water is in a pipe. The pipe is holding the water molecules (neg volumes). There is space (charged volumes) between the molecules. This space as a whole is accelerating towards the earth. Locally, to the water molecules, the the space is accelerating towards the molecules. The light has to pass through this space, which causes it's path to curve around the molecules (curved space) making its'path longer.



Nobody, you can have (+1) and (-1) at the same time, just not at the same time and place.

[dleviwing]

Originally Posted by Brent you can have (+1) and (-1) at the same time, just not at the same time and place.

+1 and -1 WHAT? Do we have numbers floating around the universe? Numbers represent quantities or values of something. If they represent charge, then you are working with a measured quantity and not an entity. That is why they are called dimensions. It is not everyone’s responsibility to learn how to understand you; it is your responsibility to learn how to present your ideas using the terms properly. You are not using the term “charge” properly; That also includes your use of Newton’s law!

[Brent]

Originally Posted by dleviwing +1 and -1 WHAT? Do we have numbers floating around the universe? Numbers represent quantities or values of something. If they represent charge, then you are working with a measured quantity and not an entity. That is why they are called dimensions. It is not everyone’s responsibility to learn how to understand you; it is your responsibility to learn how to present your ideas using the terms properly. You are not using the term “charge” properly; That also includes your use of Newton’s law!

I think I made some spelling mistakes too.

[Brent]

Ok, I see I lost you guys at the equivalent circuit with the inductor. The eqivalent circuits work and I was going to dazzle you with my equation for instantaneous velocity but nope.

[purveyor of knowledge]

I am listening perfectly Brent and I want you to continue. I believe I have discovered the TOE also but in a slightly different way than you have. What you say I believe is correct, specifically:

Matter can be created and/or destroyed. In fact motion is based on the destruction of matter at one point and the recreation of that matter at a slightly different point. To travel with instantaneous speed across a small distance is the infinite breakdown of motion.

also I would like to add this as it is the basis of my discovery

1/0 denotes the total amount of energy in existence. Also 1/0 is the fastest possible speed. What I mean to say is that 1/0 is the rate of instantaneous motion. 1/0 is the number that represents the absolute greatest value (the value of everything), just as 0/1 is the number that represents the value of nothing. Scientists will know the theory of everything as soon as they stop insisting that everything, the number, is undefined.

Furthermore, 1/0 is the rate of acceleration you must reach to exceed the speed of light. THere is a technical definition behind this. 1/0 is the amount of acceleration you would need to go from your current velocity to the speed of light in a planck second or less. Accelerate any faster than this, and you will be forced to exceed the speed of light.

Also, 1/0 is the point where positive time is exhausted and instantly flips to become negative time. This is known to some theoreticians as the big rip but what I have discovered is that it's really the big reversal. That's because time, like the number line, ultimately travels in a circle when you include the number 1/0. There is a technical definition to this. The arrow of time will reverse when two points in space seperated by one planck distance begin expanding away from eachother at faster than TSOL. This is the prediction of my theory. Also here are a few other predictions

Energy is limitless and at our disposal with proper knowledge

Everything is a bunch of different things made out of the same thing

one substance can be changed into another (alchemy)

in essence Everything is made out of light

Light, consciousness, energy, and time are all one thing

the unified field is the same thing as the undivided field, aka one thing divided by nothing, aka 1/0

1/0 is formed out of positive and negative infinity

positive and negative infinity is the north and south pole of magnetism

everything is formed out of magnetism

everything is possible, magnetic monopoles included

man is not alone

we stand on the edge of a great new era. 1/0 will show us all how we are connecting together and how our differences are really the same. 1/0 will encourage love and community and an appreciation of the ABSOLUTE GREATEST VALUE! When man knows 1/0, he will truely be one with light.

In conclusion, I just want to say welcome to TOE quest Brent. Nevermind the naysayers, just keep on telling us everything you've discovered and I'll do the same. Remember, truth prevails, and in the end we are all indeed together, victorious. Cheers!