An Idea

[Fredrick]

I like the discussion about ehter, but I am not that familiar with the terminology (mainly with the general idea of it). I tried to google an image of your eight boxes forming a large cube, but couldn't find any, Pat, because it reminds me of your discussion on ether. I had wanted to use the image as introduction to the interesting aspect that 9 in our decimal system has a peculiar property. This becomes visible when adding numbers separately, for instance, number 25 can be added up as 2 + 5 and then be shown to be a '7' number, just like number 124 is a '7' number. The fascinating part is that adding a 9, as in 259 or 1294 does not change this number from being a '7' number. It is almost as if the 8 cubicles you drew show the 9th cubicle (the whole) that both exists as such and doesn't exist. Even, if we use an eight numbered system, 7 would then subsequently be the number that plays that 'completing' role. Any comment if you see a link between ether being/not being there and the 9th cubicle in the picture you drew?

[Profpat]

Hi Felix;

1) I apologize, today I remembered it was the quarks you used to bind the atoms and not the gluons. We both agree on the quarks being responsible for the strong nuclear force, mine through the EM force, yours as I recall, was through quark penetration.

2) I think the jury is still out regarding the ether. If the ether is an EMR field than I would view it as dynamic and moving at light speed and not as static.
I had a thought experiment of stretching a cat over the flat universe to determine if it was static or dynamic.

3) I wish I could convince myself. Pure conjecture on my part.

Best,

Pat

[Profpat]

Hi Frederick;

Thanks for your input. I never viewed the octanrs as part of the ether, but maybe the space quanta, if that is what ether is made up of, are similar little cubes or spheres with the same dynamics, of positives charges with their complementary opposites.

It gives me something new to ponder.

KiGs one of our new members, redid some of my diagrams. I'm very grateful to her and I'll post 3 of the diagrams now.

Best to you and your book,

Pat

[Profpat]

[Profpat]

[Profpat]

[JAK]

My idea about the structure of atoms is stated in the attachment. Please take a look and let me know about your thoughts.

Thanks for sending me to your concepts aligning spiritual and scientific ideas. As I mentioned in "chat", your concepts are stunning.

Maybe I missed it, but I did not see a diagram correlating colors and chakras. Here's a quick link: http://www.threeheartscompany.com/chakra.html

Comparing your color chart above with the chakra colors, your chart is more appealing. I'll be eager to see your reconcilliation and/or explanation.

Thanks for your gift to us!

[Profpat]

Thank you JAK for your thoughts and comments.

Also thank you for that link, this will give me something to think about for some time, in that I like to reconcile the metaphysical with the physical.

Best to you sir,

Pat

[Profpat]

I'll repost the color wheels once I get this situation corrected

[JAK]

Looking at the two diagrams, I was struck by the center spot which is white in one diagram and black in the other.

Suddenly, "Yin and Yang" came to mind. Thoughts?

I was also struck by the Yin/Yang design. If the two inner circles represent direction of flow (one towards us and one away),
then the "paisley" patterns surrounding the dots seemed to acquire another flow or "spin" which is a quality attributed
to sub-particles (and some quarks?).

Thoughts?