[Profpat]

[JAK]

Originally Posted by Profpat My idea about the structure of atoms is stated in the attachment. Please take a look and let me know about your thoughts.

Thanks for sending me to your concepts aligning spiritual and scientific ideas. As I mentioned in "chat", your concepts are stunning.

Maybe I missed it, but I did not see a diagram correlating colors and chakras. Here's a quick link: http://www.threeheartscompany.com/chakra.html

Comparing your color chart above with the chakra colors, your chart is more appealing. I'll be eager to see your reconcilliation and/or explanation.

Thanks for your gift to us!

[Profpat]

Thank you JAK for your thoughts and comments.

Also thank you for that link, this will give me something to think about for some time, in that I like to reconcile the metaphysical with the physical.

Best to you sir,

Pat

[Profpat]

I'll repost the color wheels once I get this situation corrected

[JAK]

Looking at the two diagrams, I was struck by the center spot which is white in one diagram and black in the other.

Suddenly, "Yin and Yang" came to mind. Thoughts?

I was also struck by the Yin/Yang design. If the two inner circles represent direction of flow (one towards us and one away),
then the "paisley" patterns surrounding the dots seemed to acquire another flow or "spin" which is a quality attributed
to sub-particles (and some quarks?).

Thoughts?

[Profpat]

Hi JAK;

I have a real long area, thats why I couldnt find where to post.

I thought that if you flip my pipe cleaner model inside out that that maybe you would come up with the other image. I thought maybe every particle had its own anti particle built in with an opposite spin and perhaps charge.

[Profpat]

OK Back to the additive and subtractive color wheels

[Profpat]

I'm having problems posting those chakra colors JAK They have orange and indigo and no cyan so they are a bit different from the additive color wheel. But they do go from red the lowest to violet the highest. This corresponds to the spectrum infrared to ultraviolet. Infrared being the lowest energy level and ultraviolet being the highest.

[Fredrick]

Originally Posted by Profpat

I was a little bit disappointed to see this picture, Pat, since it does not have the originality (in my eyes) to it that the image you created of 8 cubicles forming a 9th cubicle (in my eyes) did have; that picture helped me understand why in eastern visualizations 8 takes in such an important position. I had never considered it important (to be honest, I thought it was a little bit peculiar) until I saw your visualization.

What disappoints me in particular about the 'globe' is that it is identical to the image I discussed with you, Dipayankar, and others on the three thread http://www.toequest.com/forum/your-t...html#post52739 except that I used it to show that one of the three fields is a field 'too much' to deliver the basics: one equator and one meridian already cover the basics. The second meridian appears to complete the picture, but is nothing more than just another meridian, containing the same aspects. [for those not following the link, the two fields contain a spin, so it is the equator that spins the meridian around, while the equator can be considered static; it does not work the other way around -the meridian does not create a second equator- unless we start with an object that contains no spin, but can be given spin, such as a ball]

In as far as the ether is concerned, I think it is a 'phantom' aspect, similar to the 9th cubicle that is formed by the 8 cubicles. It is really there, yet at the same time it really isn't there as well. I delivered you the information about the peculiar aspects of the number 9 in this thread to show that any structure has a peculiar overall (or last) position. While we consider matter, we have to acknowledge that overall positions are peculiar positions that in themselves can also be seen as separate positions (that are and aren't there).

P.S. I do like the little drawing to the right in which I can see a double pyramid.

[Fredrick]

Originally Posted by Profpat

Thank you, Pat, for placing these color pictures (successfully!) online. It reminds me of the discussion Austin and I had with others on the pentaist pyramid in which there are always two sides to light, the direct source of light (like a television screen, with red, blue, and green; portrayed on the right side), and the reflected situation of light (like a painting, with red -actually magenta-, blue and yellow; portrayed on the left). Thank you, I like seeing them visualized like this.

However, in the pentaist pyramid gray takes in an important location not mentioned in these images. Do you have a way to include this important aspect? Thread related question: Do you consider gray the ether of colors?